>>221588856
im trans btw

>>221588856
lol

>>221588856
You first

What you mean "still"? Have the cool kids moved on to somewhere else without telling me?

>>221588856
someone needs to make instagram style profile based design

File: Gallery_1783403992756.png (550 KB, 719x1301)

550 KB PNG

Here's my profile

https://letterboxd.com/HyenaEyes/

>>221592098
Neat, left you a subscription.

>>221588856
It's a website for women

I'd use it if it had support for tv

>>221594946
they said they're adding support for tv shows apparently

leftistboxd is completely unusable slop if youre actually trying to find something good to watch and not just use it as second twitter and leave pithy one-liner reviews to some dogshit youre gonna rate a 4.5/5 anyway. the movies section of rym is the only place i can think of that conglomerates ratings and has the least bit of discerning taste.

>>221595892
yeah I checked this website out the other day thinking I could find some interesting reviews and only found ridiculous one liners, literally things like "this movie is poop" with 30k likes, what a shit website

the imdb user reviews are much better but you need to have an account there now

>ad for Letterboxd Pro
>Top Movies of the 90's sponsored by Mentos
>top lists sponsored by Kyle MacLachlan, Sight and Sound and Minons & Monsters

you people complain about the user reviews but the blatant advertising in this site is worse

kino_pleb_skip is my username
Most of my public playlists aren't maintained but I assign all films I watch to Skip, Second Monitor, or First Monitor (or both of the latter occasionally).
It's not strictly a quality thing, first monitor has a lot of the best movies but good slow movies go with okay general movies on second monitor because you don't need to pay full attention.
Other than that the list I do try to add them to right when I watch them if applicable is Films With A Particular Set Of Tropes for Taken/John Wick type movies of varying quality. I try to leave a review for every film I watch even if sometimes it's just "skip" or "second monitor".
I watch a lot of horror, action and creature feature stuff, the point of the account was originally to find good action horror and wicklikes and to eventually get a list of 100 great movies to recommend to /tv/
750ish movies in I have a spreadsheet of about 100 candidates but now I'm pruning it down to avoid sequels, under an hour, animated, etc. I might prune out foreign language until its own separate list too.
I guess I'll see if I can get 50 really good recs by the time I hit 1k watches.
Also for anyone who tries out letterboxd because of this thread, it's more fun if you treat it as a game where you filter out top review psychos and their sycophant commenters until you start getting better top reviews and it becomes like a game of finding new shitters to filter, appropriate for an old Twitter crowd platform there seems to be no limit to number of people you can block lol

>>221592245
>left you a subscription
Who says shit like this?

>>221591965
No. They're still Box'd.

>>221588856
I got banned for "misogyny" and "slurs"
>There is smoking in this trash including gross hag Paltrow smoking. Awful. And had ratboy desecrating an ancient monument talking "we wuz pyramid builders" nonsense. And there's like 3 sex scenes and no tits in any of them. It's rated R, get some tits out. Though what I did needed today was Penn saying "if I see your kike face looking through my window again I'm gonna shoot it off!"
>This is like Barney in HIMYM except there its the joke and here they expect him to be taken seriously as a romantic lead and not in a gay movie. And with the facial hair he looks like a gay Greg Sestero. Also there is smoking and no full-frontal female nudity in this, the scene was set up for it but they didn't do it. Gives it a 2 because I think the water scenes were filmed up at Cypress Gardens, we love to see Cypress Gardens, real beautiful place, you ever visit the Lowcountry you gotta check it out
>Buckley was pretty good in Hamnet(though she did not get her tits out in that movie), terrible to see her in trash like this(though she does briefly get her tits out in this) Tons of smoking, absolutely awful. Also I thought it was going to be a musical but it isn't. Maybe it was going to be a musical and they reedited/reshot it into not being a musical, sad. There's a lot of audio in the trailers that is not in the movie including what sounds like song lyrics that really made it seem like it'd be a musical
Some examples, they did very kindly send me all my reviews, I didn't have them backed up. Guess what movies these reviews are for

>>221592245
>German
>Recent review of Citizen Vigilante talks about the movie being bad and then goes on an interminable novel length virtue signal about how racist it is to associate immigrants with crime
>posts on /tv/
Make it make sense unc

>check out the website
>open up a movie
>5 reviews pop up
>each has 10k+ likes and comments
>page down
>next 5 reviews have ~50 likes and comments
>page down
>all reviews have 0 comments / likes

This is russo-jeet tier botting.

>The platform has been majority owned by the Canadian investment company Tiny since 2023

nevermind

>>221598148
Why does niggercattle love to use platforms that do heavy language policing? Watching youtube these days is like watching toddler explain true crime. How a person of color unalived temporarily unhoused people or something like that.

>>221598349
You will notice a pattern with 2019 "feminist" (rabid psychopath) reviews and having a trillion likes compared to their few comments

>>221598382
No alternative to letterboxd currently exists for the searching and cataloguing features it provides for films

File: Skärmbild 2026-07-07 164128.png (614 KB, 643x809)

614 KB PNG

Bring it

>>221598413
yeah i enter a movie name year and write rutracker next to it in duckduck go

File: Screenshot_20260707_10453(...).jpg (392 KB, 1080x1587)

392 KB JPG

I only use it to track how many movies I watched a year

>>221598413
>cataloguing features

lol

File: Screenshot 2026-07-07 at (...).png (1.49 MB, 1903x3668)

1.49 MB PNG

For such a popular movie you'd think there'd be more engagement on recent reviews. Especially since it came out during Stonewall Month.

>>221598148
>Marty Supreme
>???
>The Bride!

>>221598544
Good job
The Notebook, the movie with a fag who looks like a gay Greg Sestero and it was filmed at Cypress Gardens
>Pretty okay artsy trash. But there's no tits out which is something you should be able to rely on from an artsy trash picture. If you're making an artsy trash picture go for an R not 13 and get some tits out. I always forget Chali XCX and Charli D'amelio are two different women. Would be a better movie with Charli D'amelio instead. Somewhat reminisent of Braid with the whole "whoa, what is time" mindbending goings but Braid is a good movie that does it well and this is real boring. Costuming and set design is fun, big ups to whoever the costuming and set design on this, only worthwhile part.
>Absolutely awful in ever way. Loads of smoking including around children and no nudity at all(which it is Angel Studios so the the lack of nudity is acceptable)
Horrible "oh, the poor refugees" garbage. If they were refugees they'd stay in Turkey not pay smugglers to get them picked up by the Greek "Coast Guard"(if they were guarding the coast they'd answer these boats with artillery). What are they fleeing in Turkey? Lack of welfare, those leeches. The "Coast Guard" captain is asked "how many people have you saved?", the real question is how many people he has killed by bringing these invaders in
These two are really obvious it isn't actually guessing, I just haven't posted my movie thoughts anywhere in a while after the letterboxd ban. Imdb is too strict and has such a high character, I don't have thoughts on movies tbat long

File: 1764130647614588.png (968 B, 322x94)

968 B PNG

if yr curve doesn't look like this you don't know art

>>221598499
Hated it, lots of smoking
Aside that pretty good even though is fag shit

File: Screenshot_2026-07-07-10-(...).jpg (11 KB, 720x267)

11 KB JPG

>>221598721
Everything is a 3/5 breddy gud
I can't rate anything a 9 because unless it has some prominent flaw, anything above an 8 I just start jumping up and down screaming "KINOOOO!" and slam 10

File: 1232.png (845 KB, 700x830)

845 KB PNG

>>221588856
https://letterboxd.com/keko/

>>221598721
I'm a simple man, I don't watch trash

File: Skärmbild 2026-07-07 174317.png (3 KB, 278x107)

3 KB PNG

>>221598721
I barely watch any new movies or any slop, so the ones I watch have a decent chance of being good,

I'm a kinoisseur and would not waste my time with trash unless someone else is choosing what to watch.

Have you no critical analysis of the movies before you decide to watch them?

>>221588856
Ever since IMDb started trying to force you to hand over your personal infos to Bezos to read the reviews, I’ve switched to Letterboxd.

>>221600330
IMDB sucked when they got rid of the forums

>>221598721
Chud
>>221598937
Coward
>>221599548
Child

>>221593895
>women
Anon, I...

>>221602039
It's maam

>>221602039
>random new romanceslop hits streaming
>it hits the "popular films this week" short list instantly
yes, actual women

>>221595892
you don't find out if the film is good by reading the top reviews, but I've found some good ones by checking out some obscure lists on it

>>221595892
Just find a couple of guys who have similar taste to you and browse their profiles for stuff they've gushed over that you've not seen. I've found dozens of all-timers by doing this.

https://boxd.it/8HjM

What’s your guys percentage at? I’ve seen 49%.

You people always sound like such bitchy little girls in these threads