Based Mr. Lucas
>>221762914wheres the lieget with it or get lost
He's right.
>>221762914This dude basically invented CGI slop and he doesn't get enough hate for it.
>>221762914resistance is futile. destroy hollywood.
the CURRENT THING BAD crowd isn't gonna like this one bit
>>221762914he's right of course and AI will let him add new scenes to the original movies using the same actors.
That's just common sense. People mad about it isn't going to change it. Any director that says AI has no use is just coping or trying to score brownie points.
>>221762914I wonder is soilenials realise Walt Disney would have deepthroated AI like a champ.He wanted his primitive Lincoln robot to replace actors in movies, imaign telling him about AI image generation
I LOVE LUCAS CANON KINO!
>>221762914>AI putting actors, directors and many other faggots out of businessGood. Fuck all these disconnected self-important cunts that have been digging their own graves for years.
remember, the hatred against AI mostly come from foids whose white collar jobs will be rendered obsolete
>>221763000They can join the 41% in the afterlife.
Yes, George Lucas has stated that AI in cinema is "inevitable" and that there is "nothing you can do about it," comparing the resistance to it as futile as trying to stop the rise of automobiles in favor of horse-drawn carriages Speaking at the Cannes Film Festival in May 2024, the Star Wars creator explained his perspective:Progress is unstoppable: He argued that technological shifts are a natural part of evolution, stating, "It's like saying, 'I don't believe these cars are gonna work. Let's just stick with the horses.' And yeah, you can say that, but that isn't the way the world works" The Future is AI: In another interview, he explicitly called it "the future" and noted that while there are risks and problems associated with the technology, "there's nothing you can do about it. That's progress" Historical Context: Lucas highlighted that his company, Industrial Light & Magic (ILM), has been pioneering digital technology for decades, viewing AI as the next logical step in that timeline rather than a sudden disruption While Lucas views this shift pragmatically, his stance has sparked debate within the industry. Many creators, including actors and writers who went on strike in 2023 to secure protections against AI, view the technology as a threat to human creativity and livelihoods Others in Hollywood remain divided, with some embracing the tools for efficiency while others fear the loss of the "human spirit" in storytelling
Oh I bet he would love that, work even less to deliver cinematic garbage.
>>221762937>>221762942>>221762997>>221763011>>221763036>>221763045>>221763073Where the fuck are all these pro-AI pajeets coming from? Nolan and Spielberg said it's just a fad BTW. I trust them way more than senile Lucas.
>>221763137GUYS LETS ALL JUST PRETEND, MAYBE AI WILL GO AWAY IF WE ALL JUST BELIEVE.
I think about the Empire everyday.
>>221763180No one is saying AI is going away, we're saying it won't be used for making entire movies. It will be used for things like background extras and crap like that.
>>221763201>AI will never be used for anything>AI is just a fad>You're just making... SLOP>Okay it will be used for SOME things, just not everything <-- you are here>AI will be used to make entire movies but they... suck.>Okay they're good, but traditional films are still the 'proper' way to do it.
He's right because if nothing else, films are too expensive now. They just are. Put your average film on and its five minutes of "An XYZ Production in association with..." and just goes on and on and on and on with everyone that ponied up a couple of million. That Trump film had 27 executive producers, thats how it goes now.Everyone in the industry knows they have to become cheaper, they just all think its everyone else that should be fired.
>>221763086true true
>>221762959Indeed.Lucas and his influence has been disaster
Noted. Streamlining the Imperial shuttle fleet is a logical step to improve efficiency and reduce logistical overhead. Given the diverse array of craft currently in use—from the versatile Lambda-class to the heavy Zeta-class and specialized assault landers—consolidating these into a more standardized fleet could significantly cut maintenance costs and simplify pilot training.Your proposal to Grand Moff Tarkin is well-timed, especially following the losses at Scarif which highlighted the need for more robust and adaptable transport solutions. A unified shuttle design or a reduced fleet of specialized, high-efficiency models could ensure better resource allocation for the Empire's expanding operations.Good luck with your presentation. May the Empire prevail.
>>221763195>empire gets defeated by a moisture farm-boyYou have an embarrassment fetish.
>>221763409In my head canon the empire is Highly competent. Luke is captured on death star and liquidated.
>>221762914>>221763137Why do leftists hate AI so much? Scared that your fake jobs are going away first?
>>221762914He's right. No amount of typing and submitting the words "AI slop" over and over again will stop it. But by all means, people are free to continue their futile anti-AI crusade. No different than people who thought the internet was a fad.
>>221763440Your head canon is a fantasy.
>>221763454>your fake jobs are going away firstThat's basically it. What's crazy is that Marx would be pro-AI, seeing as it obviously increases productivity to whatever arguable extent. These nu-leftists are really just champagne socialists.
>>221762914Mike destroyed Lucas' mind.
>>221762914The funny part is it's the jews that are the most mad about this, cause it takes away the stranglehold they have on hollywood.
>>221763454What "real" job do you have that's supposedly safe?
>>221763494What will stop it is being a money pit with no viable ROI, LMAO
>king of slop happy more advanced slop-producing methods now exist whoah
>>221762914There is no AI, just LLMs.
>>221762914>the system will rape you hard, don't even tryNo, you have the will of consent. Do not comply or engage.
>>221763103>the Resistance is stupidt. George Lucas.
>>221762914Oh I'm sure they won't stop using it, but he also thought CGI was the future and most of it still looks like shit.
>>221763103>others fear the loss of the "human spirit" in storytellingPeople say stuff like this as though the vast majority of art made by humans hasn't been shit or lost to the void of time.
Won't AI just do the same thing as CGI? Like 30 years ago people knew AI looked like crap, but as the technology advanced people started wanting more of it. Think Shrek vs Spawn. At a certain point won't AI generated scenes look good?
>>221762959The only thing Disney did right was to move away from Lucas' CGI shit. They use real locations, sets and practical effects again.
>>221763850Yeah I don't get that either. All just sounds like cope to me
>>221763680Paramedic. You?
>>221762959>CGI slop
>>221762959Lucas is a visionary and his adoption of digital film and visual effects places him among the Hitchcocks and Kurosawas of history’s most influential filmmakers. Like it or not, bitches.
>>221762914>There's Nothing You Can Do About ItI can stop watching movies.
>>221762914The future of cinema is a parking lot where the cinema used to be.
>>221763045This is sort of why I don’t worry about AI. It’s not like the Lincoln robot replaced actors. Why do you think people pay more money for food made by a chef (with help from appliances) than they do for a mass produced perfectly nutritious alternative from a factory? Is this really so hard for /tv/jeets to comprehend?
>>221764057Or we can use ai to make our ownAI means Hollywood won't have the same power over the media, this is why leftists are terrified of it
>>221764152>a mass produced perfectly nutritious alternative from a factory?well the lack of preservatives and cost-cutting additives for one.
>>221764249Right wing AI slop is still AI slop
>>221764325>Right wing AI slop is still AI slopI prompt for myself, not a hypothetical audience of libtards. I don't know why so many people struggle with this concept.
>>221762914Clearly he's wrong. They'll use it for big budget moneysink projects which have gone out of fashion with people but take for example the backrooms or obsession. They built everything for those productions and the reason people resonate with it is because things are real. Most analysts haven't clocked this yet and think it's merely them being young or because of youtube ideas. It's because humanity has an uncanny valley sense that triggers when we see AI and it is unsettling to our soul
>>221764038Use /s,anon
>>221764762>using the two latest horror slop that will be forgotten in six weeks as 'pure old fashioned masterpieces'will never understand why people keep doing htis
>>221763137If all pro AI are jeets, all anti AI are trannies.That's fair, ma'am sars.
Jana Gana Mana!
>>221764012Most of the practical stuff is from Phantom Menace. Episodes II & III are still green screen slop.
https://suno.com/song/555c2e83-4958-438c-9585-14b7dcfbf714
>>221762914He's right. Movies will of course try to pivot to being perceived as as "genuine" and "realistic", and then AI will just imitate and exceed.
>>221762914I can not watch it
>>221764910Episodes II and III look like a high school computer project and they’re STILL more loved than the Disney trilogy.
>>221764823>forgotten in six weeksAnon, Obsession has been put for like 2 months and is still being seen at my theater and by all metrics is a massive success. They'll be talking about it for decades like its Halloween or The Shining and you just have to get used to that. I wish we had a containment general for them on this board.
>>221765075>and they’re STILL more loved than the Disney trilogyWho cares? People love Nolan and Michael Bay movies. Doesn't mean either are good.
>>221764249>Or we can use ai to make our ownYeah, because that has worked so well.>it's only getting betterIt's been years and AI can't produce a single hit movie.
>>221764489You will prompt what the company allows you to prompt, moron.
>>221764325The left can't meme thoughbeit.
just like 3D was for a month
>>221765193>It's been yearsAnd we went from AI not being able to recreate stills based on simple cartoon images, like South Park, to rendering photorealistic footage.
>>221765210>You will prompt what the company allows you to prompt, moron.Do you think all the anons talking about running local models are just trolling you?
>>221765075Rewatch episode III and get back to me
>you WILL watch AI slopNo fuck off. The right is already creating a fascist AI hellscape.
>>221762937Raped
George sold you out to the mouse. Prequelfags are the battered wives of fandom, endlessly defending their abuser, and that will never not be funny.
>>221765432>I'M A PERSON AND MY NAME IS ANAKIN>check out his midichlorians tho!>NOW THAT'S POD RACING! WAHOO!>who bro! there's a sith apprentice! might be a conspiracy!>let's give dictarorial powers to this guy we're suspicious of! Great idea!>good thing this giant army showed up at the same time there's a conspiracy promoting a galatic war!>THE JEDI DON'T RESPECT MY POWER LEVEL!>I LOVE PADME SO FUCKING MUCH...AS MUCH AS I HATE FUCKING SAND!>let's send Anakin to tail the guy we're suspicious of and gave all that power to, even though we sense something off about Anakin and won't let him on the council>HE A SITH LORD!>padme...will die>I BETTER TRUST YOU EVEN THOUGH YOU STARTED THE GALACTIC WAR TO GAIN POWER! BYE BYE "1000 GENERATIONS" OF GOVERNMENT!>[murders children]>Anakin, I'm your FREN!>sperg sperg MUH POWA LEVEL! sperg sperg>Anakin...you're breaking my heart!>zeeeer ZERRRRRRR zeeeeer [twirling lightsabers]>AHHHH! MY ARM! MY LEGS! HATE! HAAAAAAAATEEEEEEE!>we can't find anything wrong with her...it appears she died of a...broken heart>AND PADME?>she told you that you were breaking her heart, bro>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Can't wait for the AI remake of Apocalypse Now
>MUH POWER LEVEL>uh, a little bit shallow for tragic hubris...>CAN YOU NOT SEE MY INNER CONFLICT!>hmmm, the relationship with Padme could be a source of conflict...>NO! IT'S FUCKING ROMANTIC! WE SAID IT'S FORBIDDEN AND THAT'S ENOUGH! NO ONE WILL NOTICE! WE'RE TELLING YOU HOW TO FEEL ABOUT THIS!>but neither of your characters really change based on one another...>CAN'T YOU SEE HOW FUCKING TRAGIC THIS IS? MY EYES CHANGED COLOUR!>this feels a little rushed...>[FORCE CHOKES PADME]>while giving birth she...dies of a broken heart?>THIS IS TRAGEDY!>ffs
>>221765538Especially since Lucas got dry raped himself
>>221765440Why do libs want to limit what people can make in their own homes?
>1. Democratically elected monarch.This was solely done because Lucas wanted Leia to be a real princess and was reaching for surface level themes about democracy. It's retarded.>2. She's a teenager.This was only done because Lucas had to restrict the age gap between Padme and Anakin. It's retarded.>3. Elected leader of an entire planet but no one recognizes her.Lucas did this because his audience is stupid and won't notice it. He wanted a cliched plot twist that depends on the fact the audience are morons.>inb4: elected monarchs existedThey weren't children.>inb4: there were child rulersThey weren't elected and had regents.>inb4: she had a body doubleShe was supposedly elected head of an entire planet.
>>221765635AI will be banned everywhere soon, people are already getting sick of it.
>>221762914Isn't all AI trained on other people's works? Copyright lawsuits are gonna come sooner or later.
>>221765699LIBERALS BANNING WHAT THEY DONT LIKE THIS IS ALL YOU PEOPLE DO
>>221765699some say the jury is still out on whether leftists are part of the people
>>221764038george has too small a filmography to really be remembered in that wayonce he dies and his foundation stops paying for headlines he'll be in the spielberg category of "made lots of money but his films are only barely remembered"
>>22176401299% of the pics are from ep1
>>221765416>local prompters will save cinemaabout as likely as all the people who claim they will write a novel
>>221765896Artists regularly do what we call master copies which are direct 1 to 1 replicas of famous art, when do we sue every artist for training off of other people's works?
>>221765896The courts will side with AI as long as it isn’t being used for deepfake porn or libel. There’s lawfare going on right now whether companies can monetize AI generated characters.
>>221762914It is the future of everything. This is the last chance you have to do anything as a human. Until the end of the universe everything produced will mostly be made by AI.
It is the future, but the future is a trash fire.
>>221766043That's disingenuous. For starters a lot of famous is so old that it's been in the public domain for a long time. Also master copies are distinctive with their own artstyle unlike AI which uses the artist's artstyle and doesn't just copy the artwork with its own. When it comes to art you can easily identify an artist's own artstyle being used by AI especially if you're familiar with their artwork.
>>221762914>visionary directors like AI>millennialtroons hate AII wonder who's right.
>>221766211*famous art
>>221766255
>>221766366These faggot writers don't have childhood trauma, either. Their trauma is their parents didn't accept their decision to go into the creative arts, or their favorite dessert place closing down.
>>221766366You can easily train a trauma based network.
>>221762914>>221762937Why should i pay for movies or shows when it is AI slop. The money dont go to the people who helped making it but goes into CEOs and investors pocket.
>>221762914>There’s nothing you can do about it.Oh, isn’t there?
>>221764910>>221766002You're both retarded niggers. There's three Episode I photos in that image.
>>221762914cinema has no future. the age of life performances will return
>>221764152>that picChrist can lefties unintentionally produce garbage that is way more racist than anything i've ever done and I call people niggers as a hobby.
>>221763454>leftistlolhttps://www.allreligionsareone.org/traps%20in%20waking%20up.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xc22Qeg2cN8
>>221766169It's the end of artists being involved in big business. It's also the end of corporations that produce anything that isn't just a massive pile of slop. You can still get handmade art with soul, it just won't come from a billion dollar corporation.It's time to start seriously supporting artists directly by knowing their name, face and reputation and getting them to group together to form big collaborations. The support structure to pay them is already in place, we just need a bigger cultural movement to support them over the corporations. All it takes to have slopless art is to know the artist.
>>221762914Movies have only ever gotten worse
>>221763011Is this where we pretend Ai isn't CGI ?
>>221762914Ai: make the prequels goodthanks
>>221766927Or we decide that being an "artist" is a fake job and just isn't that important anymore, because now everyone can do it, and most people are willing to do it for free.
>>221762914ChatGPT could write a better sequel trilogy than what Disney gave us.
>>221767173Go be brown somewhere else
>>221762914i can simply choose not to consume shit made with ai, the vast majority is absolute garbage
>>221766043>>221766043>what we call master copiesit's called master study and it usually isnt sold. here is one i did. its for training purposes and trying to understand the original artist. and as you can see mine is drawn, not sculpted.
>>221767173This would be genocide against the far left.
>>221767191do it
>>221766648>its his first time seeing SMBC
>>221765569Kino
>>221765699If it's banned for the public, it's not going to be banned for everyone.And if America bans it, other nations won't. It will just be left behind.
>>221764057thisommmmmmm
>>221763137You know White people INVENTED Artificial Intelligence, right?
>>221763201>we're saying it won't be used for making entire moviesWhy not? The technology is still in the fucking baby-steps stages and it's already showing insane amounts of promise. Can you just not extrapolate theoretical ways technology can develop?
>>221768534And Indians (not people) own the companies that developed and are using it to produce and consume digital feces
>>221767398>Only genuine, HUMAN-made shitty garbage for ME, thanks!
>>221767822>scientifically proven to make everyone that uses it dumberI don’t think the nations banning it have anything to worry about in regards to be left behind. Advanced tech is worthless when it’s operated by retards that don’t understand it to begin with.
>>221765699>AI will be banned everywhere soon,You can't just "ban" a new technology because it makes you irrationally butthurt. Not in America, at least.>people are already getting sick of it.People stopped giving a shit what leftists think a while back.
>>221765440>The right is already creating a fascist AI hellscape.Fucking what? Where? Sounds fun. How can I join?
>>221768560That's fascinating, Anon.Whites still own, invest in and invented AI and no amount of wailing & screeching on your part will ever change a single atom of reality.
>>221768638>scientifically proven to make everyone that uses it dumberOh, hey, I see you read the same pop-sci garbage-tier "studies" that get featured in places like VICE and Vogue as I do, fellow intellectual.
AI is amazing if solely for how it makes the faces of retards absolutely inflate with impotent rage simply by existing.Seeing so many people unironically get mind-broken by 1's and fucking 0's is incredibly entertaining.
>>221764325Wow that's fascinating.People will still make it, and for some reason that will continue to make you impotently seethe over it.
>>221768638>>scientifically proven to make everyone that uses it dumberMovies make everybody dumber already. The political left is genuinely all out of ideas and has moved to flailing around and shitting on the floor in the general area of all real advancements. Just go back to dialating alone while humanity advances.
>>221768740I love Ai. It’s already more logical and more creative than the people criticizing it. Also it shows how dumb the people criticizing it really are, since the only thing they can ever think to do about it is to scream “JEET, JEEET, JEEET!” at everyone all the time like they’re psychotic. Don’t know why they’re mad at Ai, since there’s clearly not a single creative thought in their brains to begin with. All these “writers” and “artists” and “developers” today are dogshit. I don’t care if they’re replaced. You can count all the good pieces of creative media that have come out in the past 15 or so years, on your hands.
>>221763500So is Star Wars lmao, do you actually think canon is "real"? I'm not even the guy who worships the empire but you're a much bigger faggot than him.
>>221769135you see, for data relevant stuff, as in court cases or insurance and whatever its mostly fine, because it doesnt and shouldnt hallucinate. we used an automation algorythm for document sorting in insurance for longer than this genslop was popularized and obviously it still made mistakes and needed a human failsafe to make things right when needed. the input/data isnt precise enough for complete automated decisionmaking and i doubt it ever will be, because the data comes from reality. now for something that requires emotion and feeling, like all the arts, its useless.
>>221769649>now for something that requires emotion and feeling, like all the arts, its useless.So then why are you terrified of it?
>>221763000Neither will the artfags that do what AI does now but are 100x more expensive and takes 100x longer
>>221763086Whats funny is most of them could embrace AI and at least be the ones doing the jobs of the ten foids that got replaced rather than bitch about it.
>>221762914>complains about industry that he helped destroyGeorge Lucass everyone.
>>221763103Its not a threat to creativity. You still nerd a creative person to imagine what they want to see and prompt the AI until it matches their intent. What you are losing are all the middlemen between the visionary and their vision (and those are the ones bitching the loudest). Those middlemen have no imagination. No vision. They just take someone else's specs and build it for them.
>>221769649>in court cases or insurancehttps://www.damiencharlotin.com/hallucinations/it hallucinates case law constantly, you literally cannot trust it to do anything important without a human babysitter constantly checking and rechecking its output
>>221762914nothing is inevitable except nature. technology can be rejected, that is entirely what makes culture unique.
>>221763676Absolutely. Think how they've contaminated the incentive structure by forcing DEI requirements for Oscar nominations as a big example.
>>221764823Hey retard, here are just some of the records it's brokenHighest-Grossing Sub-$1M Film: Surpassed the 53-year-old record previously held by Bruce Lee's $850,000 martial arts classic Enter the Dragon (1973), pushing past $400 million globally on a reported $750,000 budget.Highest-Grossing Original Horror Movie of the 21st Century: Topped the century's box office charts for entirely original horror films (movies not part of a franchise).Highest-Grossing Festival Acquisition: Purchased by Focus Features for $15 million, it became the highest-grossing movie ever acquired at a film festival.Record-Breaking Box Office Holds: Became the only wide-release horror film in history to experience a significant increase in ticket sales during its second weekend, growing 30% over its opening. It also stayed in the box office top ten for over 40 consecutive days.
>>221769135>the only thing they can ever think to do about it is to scream “JEET, JEEET, JEEET!You seem to be the low IQ one fooled by astroturfing. Not every commenter is legit, or necessarily even a real person.
>>221769978so its actually useless, huh? shame we spent so much taxes on it without having a say at all
>>221764057>>221765040/thread
>>221762914>AIThis is okay.>AI used by pajeetsThis is where everything goes to shit.Yeah, its a tool and only a talented few are going to be able to use it well.
