https://www.pcgamer.com/software/ai/george-lucas-says-rejecting-ai-is-like-rejecting-cars-in-favour-of-horses-theres-nothing-you-can-do-about-it-its-the-future/>"I have a lot of friends who are on the Film Foundation with me, that's dedicated to saving old movies, and some of them say 'I'll never do digital. Lawrence of Arabia was shot with film.'" Lucas thinks that's a bit daft: "It's the moving image. That's what it is. It's not a technology, it's an idea.">"Artificial intelligence means it's much easier for us to make movies. It's very much like sitting here saying, 'Well, I believe the horse and the buggy is really where it's at. These cars, they break down, they need gas, there's all kinds of problems with them and pretty soon they'll be making them into tanks, and then they'll be killing people. It's terrible.'"
He's rightPerformative AI seething is embarrassing
I also heard that AI killed Jf kennedy, did 9/11, groomed kids, supported Hitler and slapped your father yesterday.Just 2 more weeks and this FAD is over.
>>221767134>car companies developing subscription services for heating seatsI’ll gladly go back to horses.
it's so funny these retarded boomers finally want to adopt "new" technology and it's fucking AI. god they're dumb.
>expecting one of the original sloppers to not love AYEE EYE
This is gonna break a lot of big guys' brains. On one hand AI is associated with jeets, and being brown is bad. On the other hand George and the preqvels are le based and tradpilled, plus libtards hate AI.In the end whatever the prevailing opinion on /pol/ is will win out. /tv/ is that board's bitch, as evidenced by the fact we no longer love Avatar.
It's been like 8 years and it's failed at everything it's been applied to It failed to be money(NFTs), failed to revolutionize the art world, failed to replace humans in the workforce in almost all cases, failed to make anything entertaining, failed at everything except handling some administrative tasksBut no yeah it's the future for sure
From a commercial standpoint that views art purely as a product then maybe, but art made with that mindset tends to suck already. That's why most art is shit now. From an actual artistic standpoint though no way. You can't make genuinely deep art without a genuinely deep artist. The tools have always mattered less than the person using them.
>>221767134Roger, roger
>>221767185Why not just buy any car made before 2010? Those aren't mutually exclusive BTW
>the guy who famously replaced practical effects with CGI doesn't care about craftsmanshipNo...
Anyone who compares the invention of the combustion engine, an actual fucking innovation, to something that can pretend to Google shit for you really fast after you ask it a question and then blow smoke up your ass about how great you for asking are needs to be fucking put out of their misery.
Why have libfoids suddenly adopted AI ludditery as their latest crusade?
>>221767134Boomers as a generation are all in love with AIslop.
>>221767308You don’t see what’s done and use that to see what’s coming, huh? You just see what’s in front of you and are constantly surprised by things around you?
>>221767153>He's right>Performative AI seething is embarrassing
>James Cameron likes AI, made terminator>Martin Scorcese likes AI, made taxi driver>George Lucas likes AI, helped photoshop being madeBASED>Guilhermo del Toro dislikes AI, likes onions>Reddit dislikes AI, likes reddit>Woody Allen dislikes AI, likes cuckpornCRINGE
>>221767134Boomers love AI cause they can programme it to finish the work they started, which is ruining the world one decision at a time
>>221767134They guy who made the sloppa prequels and the special editions likes AI? Least surprising news ever?
>>221767274"Aye Eye" would be pronounced like "eye eye", Arjun. Would have been better off typing EYYY EYE
>>221767134wrong, there's nothing I WILL do about it (such as watch your movie)
Why would I pay to see AI slop?
>>221767134It's interesting to me that the people who like AI the most are boomers and jeets. Both famously stupid, low iq, egotistical, narcissistic scammers. Not saying anything just noticing.
>>221767134A sequel trilogy made by George using AI would be very meme worthy. It would be the prequels on crack.
luddites on suicide watch. george right as always.
>>221767134>the future is inevitablewhat a stupid take these boomers have. it's NOT.
>>221767134now this nigga needs to give us star wars kino himself and prove it. he's got the tools, no jewish bullshit is holding him back
>>221767134he has 100% generated Darth Talon porn with a million dollar computer
>>221769898Keep saying Jeet. That will stop Ai any day now.
>>221767134>Leigh Brackett dies>Suddenly Star Wars sucksshocking
Luke, switch off your targeting computer
>>221767134Based George
>>221767219>it's so funny these retarded boomers finally want to adopt "new" technology and it's fucking AI. god they're dumbI'm so fucking tired of midwit retard zoomers offering their oblivious zoomer hot takes.Fucking George is notorious for embracing new technology and using it to go back and revise his star wars movies adding random CGI nonsense to shit made in the 70s, and you're going to try and get up on your zoomer high horse complaining about boomers not embracing technology until AI?Shut the fuck up and sit the fuck down broccoli boi. Don't you have some 16 year old boy to cancel for flirting with a 15 year and 364 day old girl in his class, or something?
>>221767134Why is AI wrong?Give me a non transsexual answer, sars.
>>221767134For big Hollywood companies? Sure. They´ll take anything that helps them save a buck and the contemporary productions are already shit anyways so nothing of value will be lost. If you told me AI slop is going to replace Alien, Terminator, Blade Runner, Gladiator and the like i wouldn´t believe you but if you tell me it´s going to replace Jurassic World, Terminator 5 and capeshit i would say yeah, sure.It may be different for authors. Authors like control and to actually do stuff themselves because that´s the point for them. It´s not like other jobs on which one hates every single minute of the process. I reckon an author with an honest vision and a distinctive style will still have a fair chance to stand out in a market saturated by AI sequels released every 2 seconds. For them nothing really changes except there will be far more "competition".
>>221767134It's more like homo erectus rejecting homo sapiens in favor of homo erectus.By which I mean it's a pretty smart move if that's at all an option, and even if we're not sure if we could pull it off we should still try because the alternative is extinction.
>>221767134If AI was as inevitable as everyone in film seems to say, tech bros wouldn't be trying to foist the tools off onto anyone and everyone who shows even an inkling of curiosity. That shit would be locked down HARD and only accessible to a select few who could pay mountains of cash to access it. They'd gen all future media, and bank hard off of it.
>>221770361>I reckon an author with an honest vision and a distinctive style will still have a fair chance to stand out in a market saturated by AI sequels released every 2 seconds.No. When there are hundreds of thousands of books being genned every day, it will be nearly impossible to cut through the noise. You can be a fantastic writer, but people still need to be able to find you. Known authors may still have a chance since people are already paying attention to them, but new authors will have the nearly impossible task of trying to get people to notice that they've done anything at all. It has less to do with authors having an honest vision and distinctive style and more to do with an insurmountable signal to noise ratio.
Cars have ruined the entire fucking world
>>221770361>I reckon an author with an honest vision and a distinctive style will still have a fair chance to stand out in a market saturated by AI sequels released every 2 seconds.The publishing industry is mostly dead despite whatever monster-fucking is getting pushed on "bookTok" or B&N opening up a few new locations after spending 20 years shuttering them.
>>221767134>>221762914Dumbass.
>George Lucas said rejecting black booty is like rejecting cars in favour of horses>theres nothing you do about it it's the future
>>221767288its only been 3 years you fucking retarded. if you want to get technical the concepts been around for 50 yearsAlso everything you said is wrong
>>221770538While i agree the amount of noise is certainly going to be a problem, it already is, counter measures are sure to be developed because there will be a market for them.
>>221770361>>221770538anyone that would read an ai novel is a fucking moron of the lowest tier of morons.You are a moron for even entertaining the idea
>>221767134>muh portfolio! Shills terrified the AI bubble is going to burst because its not ready for prime time and cant meet the hype.
>>221770291the only thing wrong is the jews who are controlling the world with it
>>221770291
Technological progressives are so insufferable. >Embrace the AI!>Take the vaxx!Anti-human commies, all of them.
>>221772190>>221772399>*shits pants* da joos
>There's nothing you can do about it... it's the future.A fact that all of the AI seethers are going to have to deal with. AI is here and it's not going away. It's pandora's box. You can't stop it now. It's only going to get more prevalent and powerful. How do you think you're going to stop it? lol
>>221770917Apparently reading comprehension is not your thing. If you're searching for a new fantasy novel, and only 5 out of 50,000 were written by a real person, there's less of a likelihood that you're going to find the books written by people. AI novels don't have to disclose that they were written by AI, and because of the stigma, it behooves AI enthusiasts to LARP as an actual author. It's not about what people want to read, it's about having real shit get lost in the gigantic pile of generated bullshit.
>>221767134I'd rather watch an AI movie than any Star Wars movie, story, cartoon, or animation that came after Empire Strikes Back.
>>221772680Are you Indian?
>>221772634you are an idiot
>>221770883>counter measures are sure to be developed because there will be a market for themand then there will be counter counter measures because of that very same market. Visual artists started trying to prove that they actually created the art that they posted online by creating timelapse process videos so you could actually see them make the art. But then AI bros started genning "process videos" in an attempt to trick people into thinking their slop was human made. Even if laws are passed requiring creators to disclose whether something was created with AI or not, I suspect we'll start seeing a lot of claims of work being "AI assisted" implying that tech was simply used to speed up the process or that it was only used for rudimentary editing. However, the amount of human involvement will always be questionable.
>>221772634>one person writes a real novel>it's a hit>AIfags can instantly churn out a bunch of knockoffs "trained" on the original work>be artist>draw something unique >AIsloppers can "train" an AI model on the artist's work and churn out infinite permutations of it in minutes And in both cases, the AIslop could not exist without the work of the actual writer or artist. >inb4 buhbuhbut people have always made uncreative knockoff slop!Yes, but at least it required effort and could not be produced at a rate that it completely floods the market and can almost instantly rob the novelty of the original and take away the writer's/artist's chance to meaningfully benefit from their creation.
>>221772729>ad hominem I accept your concession
>>221767134Millennialsisters... we need to fight back against AI chuds!!!(for us, obviously. blue collar workers that might lose their jobs due to AI should learn to code lol)
>>221772735stfu doomer. Its easy as shit to vet peoples work as authentic. They literally have artists turn up in person and do art.Also ai can detect ai pretty easily now
>>221767383Is this the Clone Wars cartoon?
>>221767134>there's nothing you can do about itbut there is, there's a million things you can do about it, it reminds me of his famous quote of "if i had a hammer", every time he makes a statement it reminds me of how colossal George's retardation actually is
>>221772766>Also ai can detect ai pretty easily nowno it can't. And it's also been false flagging peoples' work. There are music artists who are having their work flagged as AI by AI detection systems and their work demonetized. Recordings which were made well before LLMs.
>>221772757you are stupid, sit down AIDS faggot.Publishers are already going to vet books, if you are specifically going out of your way to buy self published books from randoms sure but the. you are looking for it.You troons are complaining about non issues because you are hysterical and neurotic
>>221767134the people rejecting AI today will be using it for everything tomorrow. https://www.bitchute.com/video/OKW50Sg2XbfJ
>>221772798yes it can. >llmGo back to redit, stop arguing like its 2023
>>221772805>Publishers are already going to vet books
>>221772778there isnt. Enjoy being on the loser side of history
>>221772760>t.
>>221772980Jensen is literally a GOD him and Carmack are my top two tech GODS
>>221772805after what happened with Hachette and Shy Girl, I suspect that publishers don't care, so long as they make a profit. but now maybe they will be more cautious after all the negative press.
>>221772869>dude bend over and let the techno wizards fuck you in the ass lmao like don't bother learning anything and let AI do everythingno thanks you cum guzzling faggot
>>221772869By that measure being against the pressured MRNA vaccinations was also on the "loser side of history" because most of the human population took the vaccinations.
>>221773148you are irrelevant and a degenerate
>>221773163Ai and vaccines can cure cancer>i dont wanna take vaccine that cures cancer if i need itthats a you problem.Im not vaxxed btw. Reality doesn't adhere to your poltardation
>>221767134Just an idea since he is such a huge piece of shit. No sticky when he dies.
>>221767308>Why not just buy any car made before 2010?they'll be phased out for the sake of the environment
>>221772980this doesn't count and you know it, stop trying to control the narrative you peice of shit. every single antiai libtard journalist and programmer and artist told me to go fuck myself and learn to code and now i'm going to get my revenge finally
>>221770029ok, streetshitter
>>221773199>Im not vaxxed btw>But still pro vaxxYou're an inconsistent hypocrite that shouldn't be taken seriously.
>>221773220this honestly, all the anti-ai shitlibs are the same people that spent decades spamming "dey took yer jerbs"Now every time i see one of their posts crying about how ai is taking their "jobs" i post "they took yer jerbs"It drives them nuts and is funny as fuck
>>221773265if i had cancer i would take the vaccine to cure it.Im a pragmatist and not mentally defective like you
>>221770291Name 1 thing it's tangibly improved
>>221773309porn
>>221773265Theres no hypocrisy you brainlet. The covid vax wasn't required to live.If you have cancer you are dying and if a vaccine is the only way to cure it it's your only fucking chance
>>221773288>if i had cancer i would take the vaccine to cure it.>take the vaccine to cure it.Is somebody gonna tell him?
>>221773375Sit down poltard. ai tailored personal vaccines have already had great success curing cancer.
>>221773330ok yeah maybe, i've jacked it to LLMs before and i can generate hentai of chicks with hairy pits in secrecy, so that's a boon
i fucking hate the CGI in his Director's Cut of THX-1138, but it's the only official release that doesn't have e.g. the nudity cut out.i think most people are on the same page that he can toy with this stuff and remix his old films, but the original versions ought to be available too.
>>221773168don't wait for christmas buddy, just put that gun in your mouth, nobody is going to miss you
>>221773530kys you reprobate
>>221773309>it's being used in the creation of new vaccines>it's being used in assistamce to mathematical calculation for weather predictionOh wait, you mean about meme consumer AI. You are right, anon, it's useless, lol.
>>221767134Cars liberate the people, AI steals liberty from the people by creating a hardware crises and allowing the government to fabricate evidence (and then stacking juries with people too stupid to detect AI)
>>221773739consumer ai is brilliant though
>>221773773don't forget that every time someone prompts a dancing cat clip, Ai datacentres give off the heat of 40 nuclear bombs directed at local peoples brains
based georgeanti AI haters are luddites
>>221773372>Theres no hypocrisy you brainletThe fact that you shifted the goalposts to cancer related stuff when the covid vax was brought up proves you wrong. In the context of being a minority against what was being rolled out onto the majority and being on the "loser side of history" for being said minority.But my guess is that you are also pro overall covid vax policy despite saying you didn't take it. Which either makes you a hypocrite or your idea that people should roll over to technological "progress" is bunk.Either way, typical commie flip flop logic.
>>221773928you are literally mentally ill. Not everything is an ideological purity test you retarded poltard faggot. Go fuck yourself and your stupid views.
>>221773953You argue like an Indian.
>>221773965you can't argue at all
What do people complaining on the internet think they're going to do to stop AI? lol
>>221773972I'm not the one resorting to ad-hom.
>>221773981yeah like this guy>>221772778Being against ai is like saying you will 1v1 the entire US military.It's just not a mature rational thing to say.
>>221772318>I AM SATAN!
>>221773981it's edgy rhetoric kids from pol (left&right) they actually believe low iq rhetorical junk posts can affect the world. Because they believe in magical thinking.>if i stamp my feet hard enough and poop my pants hard enough i can do anything.This is where the buck stops on low iq political rhetoric.Technological progress > political nerds spergingtl;dr poltards (left&right) are powerless and that scares them.Ai is real powah
>>221767134Makes me happy to see Lucas consistently shitting down the throats of the battered manchildren that still beg for him
>>221774003>like saying you will 1v1 the entire US militaryi didn't say beat AI, i just said that there's stuff you can do about it, a fucking movie completely made with Blender won the oscar for best animate movie, do you understand that? do you understand what "doing something" means you fucking inbred useless mongoloid? ding something about it also means deciding not to use it and just go on with your life
>>221774080there is nothing. Zilch. Nada. You can do about it. You are a fool.
>>221767134 >rejecting cars in favour of horses
Every actual creative, accomplished artist sees AI as nothing more than an exciting new tool. But the unwashed, untalented, brown masses that dominate the internet now, 4chan and xitter included, are deranged vagina having luddites. Pathetic.
>>221773309fun
>>221774704Ain't this the dude that made the bad dune adaption
>>221774704the audio stuff is really every engineer's lifelong dream
>"Theres nothing you can do..."Oh George, you fat sellout you*Laughs in Amish*
>>221772634I love that shot. it's a matte painting. only the dude in the middle and the concrete floor around him is live action.
>>221775251And the amish are the happiest group of people in america.Coincidence?Anyway, George is right though. The technology already works. It would be one thing if it still didn't work, but it 100% can do what it's being sold as in all of the main purposes.But you get people going>w-well it's being subsidized! Those 20 dollar subscriptions actually cost openai 200 dollars a month! It's going to collapse!Okay. Maybe openai will collapse. The models that are open are already good enough. Unless hardware suddenly gets way worse in the next 10 years it really is inevitable because even the "It's 10x as expensive as you think!" Okay... but it's still 10x less expensive than the people's skills it replaces, even at the inflated prices that will trend towards zero over time.>IT'S LIKE NETFLIX AND UBER! They undercut until you're reliant on them and then they jack the price up to the same it was before!Yeah, uber did that, but uber's product is a fixed service. The service costs virtually the same as it cost when it debuted. AI will get cheaper. in 2030, a fable 5 model will be runnable on consumer hardware, locally, and the model will be available for free.
>>221775886100% of the anti-ai posting you see on the internet is from ccp bots/shills/wumao and useful idiots.There is no downside to this tech, no valid criticism.
it's more akin to rejecting practical effects because computers can do the same faster and cheaper (according to the computer salesman)
>>221776006Oh, no I agree it's bad. But the anti-ai arguments aren't valid. If people were just making the argument that it is an abomination and will destroy the soul of humanity I would be for that argument. But the cope arguments about how it isn't going to replace everybody are wrong. If your job is based on knowing things or doing digital work it's over. Blue collar has a little bit longer, but not much.
>>221776080humanity already did a good job destroying its soul. Ai is an improvement.
>>221776132That was corporations, not people broadly. workers still have souls (despite the best effort of people with MBAs), and AI aims to take what remains of that away.
AI is a fucking TOOLLike all tools it can be ABUSEDIt is an annoyingly efficient tool and as such it’s a very lazy tool. This means Indians WILL abuse if lazily. This means you WILL end up hating it incredibly. Lazy people and Indians ruin the perception of EVERYTHING.
>>221776183I don't believe in your commie shit. People have been killing people well before corporations. Communism has the highest death count and greatest source of misery pinko
uhoh prequel contrarian autists are going to have to throw George under the bus now lol instead of defending his slop, ohh deary me, what a day, what a conundrum say it ain't so
>>221776196Yep it’s the same with cars and guns. You hate the people driving/shooting them, not the cars and guns themselves. It’s entirely a human issue.
>>221776229It's not capitalism. I'm all for a return to 50's/60's style capitalism. We aren't doing capitalism.
If AI existed in 1999 Lucas would've used it to make the prequels for him.
>>221776196And much like everything it'll be abused by capitalists. Everything good is destroyed by money.
>>221776295>da capitalists
>>221767134The world would've been in a better state if cars didn't exist and everyone had to use buses and railways.
>>221776280>george describes watto>AI refuses to make it for him
>>221767134How much was he paid to say this?
>>221767134>rejecting cars in favor of horsesThat's right, we should have done that. Cars ruined the world.
>>221767134there's nothing you can do about it, is probably the truth. sad
>>221776650TRVTH NVKE
>>221770858>3 yearsNot to defend the other sperg but no, it certainly has not been 3 years. I was using SD in 2019 and earlier shittier models had already been out for a little while by then.8 years is pretty accurate.
>>221779957the current "ai revolution" started in 2023. Thats when it got noticeably better mimicing art and everyone went bananas.No shit it existed earlier, like i said it existed for decades.
>>221767491>>Reddit dislikes AI, likes redditProof of this?
>>221779999>I will choose arbitrary starting points based on my own notionsnigga, ai models as we know them today started in 2019. doesn't matter if they were shittier. Before then there were no "ai" systems set up as neural nets.
>>221780054its not arbitrary you moronic ignorant fucking retard
>>221780095>spergs out with insultsI accept your concession, kid.
>>221767134He was always a fag about technology that's why he crapped all over the original SFX artists with the special editions and filled the prequels with shitty CGI.
>>221780303uhuh. im glad ai exists so stupid people like you are irrelevant now
>>221767134George with AI would have made true kino if he still owned star wars. Imagine the episode 4 re-remaster remastered
>>221780054Of course they weren'tWink
>>221780366kek, so mad
>>221767134Except cars now are going to be entirely mobile surveillance devices that record you, who you're with, every conversation you have, monitor everywhere you go. If the government doesn't like you, the opinions you hold, the way you live your life, they can remotely shut off your car. They can also geofence you in restricting your movements. Fuck everyone who blindly accepts this dystopia future. They all deserve to be lined up against a wall and shot
>>221780366
every actuall artists and creative personis ok with AI and its just bunch of code monkeys and faggots drawing futa porn who complain about it XD
>>221780347but he was right, CGI was the future. he was just bad at using it
>>221767134>it's coming for you whether you like it or not!Way to convince me.
>>221767134Lucas doesn't give a fuck about art anymore, people need to understand this. He said Kenobi is a fun romp despite how many issues it has and loves Disney.The reality is that Lucas is retired and doesn't care about shit anymore. Paying attention to him nowadays is retarded.
