>A movie about a person making a movie...what is the purpose?
Take the "I am le wacky guy who has no internal monologue" shit back to the discord you crawled out of.
>>221785953How about (You) stfu, discord tranny?
>>221785837>Movies are so fucking shit now we have to have movies about how good movies were made instead of using those lessons to make new, good moviesgrim.
>>221785837Because everything Stallone has made is getting remade>cliffhanger remake>Rambo prequel>Rocky biopic>Female expendables
>>221785837This movie is gonna flop harder than the smashing machine>>221786092>Female expendablesWait, what movie is it?
>>221785837fuck hollywood
>>221785837movies about making movies are always titwankery
>>221786092They already made female Expendables.
>>221786092wake me up when they do demolition man remake and they show you how to use the 3 shells
>>221786092>cliffhanger remakeIsn't this female centric too? DOA.
>>221786166you better believe they'll include that scene for a promotional tiktok
>>221786092I suspect Stallone gets a cut of all those projects?
>>221786166In MY mind the three shells were just buttons..>wipe>spray>dryor something along those lines.
Will asr show her tits and or ass in this?
>>221787752Her and Joey King need to make a movie together. An adult film like Stallone did early in his career.
>>221785837>...what is the purpose?The baby boomer generation believes they solved human civilization and lived at the apex of history, and before they die they will celebrate their achievements and never relinquish their power for generations. We will probably continue to live in the shadow of the 20th century for another 50 years
>>221788134Do you zoomies ever take accountability for anything in your lives?
>>221788100This but Isabella sermon
>>221785837I really liked Stallone's recent documentary few years ago called "SLY"
>>221785837Yeah, everyone hated Ed Wood, right?
>>221785837Some people are interested in the process of filmmaking, you absolute doofus. What kind of stupid fucking question is that?
>>221785837Seems kind of funny to make a docudrama about a living actor. You'd think a proper documentary would be more insightful.
>>221786163Why do they always give these films such dogshit covers? It would be so easy to do a better poster, you just put together a room where the walls are lined with guns (assuming that you don't already have one for the film), put a table in the middle with documents, a briefcase, and some money, light the whole thing dynamically and have the actresses stand around the table while facing the camera and holding guns. Then maybe it wouldn't look like the kind of film that goes immediately into a discount bin.
>>221785837Entertainment
>>221785837>A movie about a person making a movieNouvelle Vague from Linklatter is excellent tho
I warned you all about perpetual remake and nostalgia hell 20 years ago but you didn't want to listen.
>>221790758This isn't a new thing, zoomer.
Why do all these biopics have a girl who supports his dream? They did it in the Springsteen biopic too. People think Joan Baez gave Dylan a career from the movie even though he was signed and already getting some acclaim.
>>221786163zoe bell would've been a star if she wasnt so butch
>>221786163>bridget nielson got top billing>they still stuck her in the back
>>2217858371 of the rarest times Crappywood let slip the "American dream" of self-made success. He wrote himself out of bit roles into movie stardom. Might do sub-Green Book numbers if good WOM. The famous theme song still works, but how many of the OG fans died off?
>>221785837So someone can make a movie about making this in twenty years
>>221786092Now he’s getting a remake himself, like pottery.
