[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: HNSRoFFWMAAdCSG.jpg (88 KB, 806x1132)
88 KB JPG
TOTAL CHUD DEATH
>>
>>221798041
It's sad that you have to make things up to earn a win. And NO, I'm not talking about the score.
>>
>>221798166
>And NO, I'm not talking about the thing that's made up
?
>>
>acting like critic scores have ever been anything other than paid marketing
>>
>>221798198
I was referring to "chuds" hating the movie. Outside of exactly two people, I've never even heard of anyone else bitch about this.
>>
>>221798166
wot
>>
>>221798198
>>221798244
That also said, I do find it odd that the audience score is empty.
>>
>>221798041
who would you recommend crap movies to if your enemies died?
>>
>>221798041
I honestly wonder how much of the budget was dedicated to paying for these reviews.
>>
North Korea tier, reminds me of the TFA scores prior to that hero with his "Glib Facsimile" review.
>>
>>221798233
You're probably a fag and people know better than to voice politically incorrect opinions around you.
>>
>>221798041
why are you so upset?
>>
>>221798371
I live in an extremely rural and conservative area (though you are right about me being queer), and I've never heard anyone make a big stink over this movie.
>>
>>221798396
OP is the same same fag that posts
>i'm so sick of anti-wokes
not realizing there wouldn't be "anti" anything had they not pushed DEI, feminism, etc. on every corner of /tv/
>>
File: 1770432723705020.jpg (94 KB, 1338x716)
94 KB JPG
well if the critics rated it highly then it must be good
they've never rated a shit movie highly before
>>
ok, now how about audience scores?
>>
>>221798296
Its not out yet dingus
>>
>>221798396
you lost tranny
>>
You sure about that.
>>
>>221798404
Probably because nobody talks to you.
>>
ITS DROPPING

STOP THE COUNT!
STOP THE COUNT!
>>
>>221798555
I have this thing called, this may sound like a foreign concept to you, called "human interaction" and a have what's called a "life" outside of here.
>>
No...ITS NOT BETTER THAN TROY NOOOOOOOOOO
>>
>>221798041
>TOTAL CHUD DEATH
Sure thing, buddy. The critic rating on rottentomatoes has totally never been top tier for the worst movies of all time. No. Rottentomatoes is legit, and these critics are reliable. This movie is confirmed great.
>>
>>221798041
>>221798437
At this point I think we've entered the "anti-anti-woke" phase, because at this point I see more posts by people complaining about anti-woke people, then posts by actual anti-woke people. Not saying that they don't exist (like woke people), but been noticing a lot as of late.

Almost always to be a scapegoat too to shield oneself from criticism too.
>>
>>221798622
I mean by this logic, if we take Rotten Tomatoes seriously, then Big Mouth would be the best show of all time.
>>
>>221798041
Chuds got OWNED libtard style
>>
>>221798949
Between this and Big Mouth being so praised by RT, I feel ALL CRITICS on RT should have their hard drives searched.
>>
>>221798041
these spam threads are as "organic" as the 36 OBSESSION threads on at any given day for the last week or so.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.