What would happen if it outperforms "Odyssey"?
>>221806045An Obsession thread died for this
fuckkkkkkk id be like whoaaaanolan would be like wtf?????consequences would never be the same
>>221806045zoomers fucking ruined cinema
>>221806045it already outperformed odyssey because it has freaky nikki
>>221806045It only made 400 million dollars. Its not that impressive. Its only impressive in comparison to its budget of $750,000.
>>221806086Why is the main actress broke if it made $400 million?
>>221806045Kill yourself
>>221806127this is what happened. one company paid to create obsession, they paid 750,000. They paid the camera crew, the actors, and the director, that all came out of the 750,000. After they spent all that money, they now owned the film that the actors and directors made and the actors and directors got their checks, the actors and directors are not business people, theyre just workers for a single check that they got like most people. that company couldnt actually distribute it in films, so they sold it to another company for 15 million dollars, so the creater company made a 14 million dollar profit selling what was their property. then the new company actually put it out in theatres and made 400 million and so they made a 385 million dollar profit from the 14 million they spent buying the film. So once she was paid her pennies out of the original 750,000 everything that was filmed with her in it belonged to someone else and they got rich off of it, not her.
>>221806045how my gf looks at me when i tell her i don't wanna lick her asshole tonight
>>221806045she is fucking hot i would fuck her with my right nut
>>221806045movie is misandrist propaganda
>>221806045chaos, cats marrying dogs,
>>221806045
>>221806045I would be very happy
>>221806045who is this white jezebel shedevil
>>221806127Because her contract didn't include residuals, which is something that only big stars get unless it's the only form of compensation.
>>221806045Relative to its budget, it definitely will outperform The Odyssey. In terms of absolute revenue made, it definitely won't. >>221806127What the other anons said. The actors are contractors in this case. The best they can do is capitalize on their fame while they can and get better deals next time. If I were her, I'd take endorsement deals asap. Makeup/skin care companies, fashion designers, all that shit. Next acting gig needs to have residuals in the deal. This kind of fame rarely lasts.
>>221808366If she was smart she would leverage the films discussion into some sort of woke feminist podcast
>>221806045Do we see her goods?
>>221806127>Yeah I'll take the lump sum. I got bills to payMany such cases
>>221806045CHUDS don't like this movie either. Odyssey and Obsession broke /tv/ this year, and SpiderMan with Zendaya hasn't come out yet
>>221808457No boobas or vaginaIf you are freaky there is shoot of her naked feet at the very end of the movie
>>221808400No, podcasting is for paying bills and saving after the retirement money from acting and endorsement deals have run dry.
>>221806127>apple made 5 billion dollars last year>why did I only make my my hourly wage gee I wonder retard
>>221806045Her stand out expression is something AVGN did 20 years ago.
>>221806045The end of incel ideology I reckon
>>221808400Not a bad idea desu, incels would work round the clock to give it free publicity.
