>Yet his film nigger is filmed in godawful digital
It's shot on Vistavision they literally talk about it in that interview
>>221807561really? looks like digital lol
>>221807616modern lenses and lighting, digital color grading and CGI. I agree it doesn't have a film look at all but it is. though I suspect it'll look better on a projector in theatres youtube compression isn't doing it any favours
>>221807511I read that as NIGGER instead of his film digger.
The vulgar racists on here are even dumber than normal brainlets.
>>221807561all of these large formats just end up looking like digital, they should shoot on 16mm if they want it to look like real kino
>>221807858The polite racists are much nicer
The only thing I like about Digger so far is how it looks. Smolbrain vulgarian racist OP mistakes it for digital and shits on it despite it looking good. You're not even cattle, OP. You're part of the insect swarm circling cattle's crusty ass.>>221807907Yes, definitely.
