https://youtube.com/watch?v=O2hZMfpYTqU
Let me guess, they both liked it.
It was like that meme of Ernie going off and Bert just knowing they're done.
>>221847837Brad loved it. Douge hated it.
>>221847883>A NIGGER HELEN?
>>221847737I don't know who these follically challenged gentlemen are.Why should I care about their opinion?
>>221847883I stand corrected.Doug, I sincerely apologise.
>>221847915He made sure to say he had no problem with the blacks or troon.
>>221847920I don't know who this vertically challenged anon is.Why should I care about his opinion?
>>221847995I didn't give one.I'm sorry that I made fun of your parasocial loverbuy an ad
>>221847737They have a great chemistry, they should do a formal out of character show together
>>221847737Do people still watch this shit? They must be in their 50s by now. Don't complain about Only Fans when shit like this is still being supported by retards.
>>221848196It's actually weird to be the guy who insists on only watching new content creators because they need to stay "current".
>>221847883Well of course. For those not in the know Doug Walker is legitimately giga based. Only e-celeb that somehow has gone the opposite direction into being more down to earth, respectable and funny as time passes.
You guys ever wish that you had friends to see movies with?
>>221848301I'd much rather have a friend to go drinking with
>>221847737People are seething in the comments that Doug hated the movie.
>>221848687the marriage of the nolanoid cult with leftroon politics was a genius marketing move
>>221847962He's lying.
>>221849947expect every normie reviewer to go>yeah it was bad but i don't caaare it had blacks and trannies, they did an alright job
>>221847883Unironically, as cringe as he is and as bad as his humor is, Doug has impeccable judgement and genuinely knows his shit. If he dropped the comedy shit he would be one of the most accurate film reviewers.
>>221847962Doug said that when “the black guy with the dreads” showed up, he was unsure what to think but when the guy started acting he was won over lol.
>>221847883Based Dougy. Some of the scenes in this movie do remind me of Kickassia and Suburban Knights. Maybe Nolan is a fan of the Lightbringer.
>>221847737Doug is the caucasian Armond White.
>>221848687oh great so everyones opinion will be soured with the need to appease the psychos on the internet, rather than give true reception like BOTW and all the nintendo fanboys that forced every eceleb to pretend it wasnt dog shit
>>221850007True. Though the one thing I can knock him for is his love for Steven Universe. I think he enjoys the narrative of it when I would only think he'd like it for the animation.
>>221847915>BLACK GUY! WOMAN! GET IN HERE!
>>221850152>True. Though the one thing I can knock him for is his love for Steven Universe. I think he enjoys the narrative of it when I would only think he'd like it for the animation.Stephen Universe is a fine show, narratively, when you get past its preachiness. I can see someone liking it. He's not wrong.
>>221847737TLDW: Doug’s main complaint is the constant editing. He counted an edit every 2 seconds on average. He wanted longer moments to let the movie breathe and so he could watch the actors without constant cuts. Thinks Nolan does too much telling instead of showing. Pattinson was by far the best actor, Matt Damon sucked.
>>221850285forgot to mention in this post that I have stage 5 HIV
>>221847883Brad btw is the reason Doug had to do all these collabs with all the weirdos from the man with glasses, his Jewish brother
>>221847737Why is that asshole on the right laughing while he's talking? I fucking hate it.
>>221850305Disliking something for its politics is not a refutation of its technical merits.
>>221850304Yeah, it’s typical Nolan pretentiousness again alright
>>221850304>Thinks Nolan does too much telling instead of showing.Holy FUCK the amount of telling in this movie though. Yas though, Pattison was tremendous. I agree with Doug that some time to actually appreciate what good performances the film had, rather than editing it like a Resident Evil movie, would have been nice.
>>221847737>Doug liked Elliot's performanceNot so fast, chuds.
Crazy the difference between responses. Real critics hated it and media-captured zombies loved it. Shocking disparity.
7/10 from me. Good entertainment, but flawed and I probably won't watch it again.
>>221851593>Good entertainment, but flawed and I probably won't watch it again.Seems to be the consensus. 6-7/10 range.>Worst editing ever.>Ugly as sin.>Awful performances except Pattison who is great.>Put together well enough that its endless flaws aren't overtly offensive.
these redlettermedia guys look weird now
>>221847962Wouldn’t shock me if that’s true. In his Rat Race review he got weirdly hung up on the joke at the expense of a cross dresser.
>>221851625>Worst editing ever.Yeah, I usually don't care about editing that much, but fucking hell.
>Doug: "The editing was awful, too fast and left no room for the performances to breathe.">Brad: "I had no problem with that.">Doug: "Every set looked the same, I couldn't even tell if they were just reusing one set over and over.>Brad: "I had no problem with that.">Doug: "It was hideous and ugly, the costumes and cinematography looked bad.">Brad: "I had no problem with that.">Doug: "The pacing was boring and the constant exposition ruined it even more.">Brad: "I had no problem with that."THE ABSOLUTE FUCKING STATE OF SLOP ZOMBIES HOLY FUCKBased Doug judging a film on its merits though.
What do Jillian Zurawski's huge tits have to say about it
>>221851593>>221851625>(burp) Welp, this sure was slop. I'll keep paying to watch more, of course. I am very intelligent.Useful idiots. Keep shoveling your shekels away, though. You're doing your masters a huge favor.
>>221850007Ive been watching him lately but he seems to focus too much on kids movies.
buy an ad, no one cares
>>221851746>Ive been watching him lately but he seems to focus too much on kids movies.It's the genre he cut his teeth on, so he sticks to it.
>>221851701>Based Doug judging a film on its merits though.I've grown to enjoy Doug as a film critic. He has the occasional odd opinion, but overall he's usually fair and unbiased and able to acknowledge the good and bad in most movies. This seems rare nowadays.
>>221851801>I've grown to enjoy Doug as a film critic. He has the occasional odd opinion, but overall he's usually fair and unbiased and able to acknowledge the good and bad in most movies. This seems rare nowadays.Honestly? After watching his reviews I am shocked to see how knowledgeable he is about almost every aspect of cinema.I always thought he was just some cringe youtube guy, but he seriously knows his shit.
>>221851745Not what I said at all (the first post), but ok. It's literally just a movie and I think 7/10 is a fair rating based on what I liked and didn't like about it. Sorry if this bothers you.
>>221848687>policerthoughtFitting.
>>221851830>I always thought he was just some cringe youtube guyHe used to be, and only started doing these regular reviews maybe five years ago. He's good when he's serious and doesn't try to be funny.
>>221851892>He's good when he's serious and doesn't try to be funny.I get that sense. I've only seen a few of his reviews. I remember him whipping out a reference to obscure avant-garde films in one I watched and it nearly broke my neck with whiplash.He seemed very level headed in this one, and watching him bounce his real critiques off a guy just repeatedly going "Durrrrr uhhh I had no problem with that." is crazy.
Those who can, doThose who can't, criticize.Always remember that, Dough
>"I love that I'm sitting here watching an Odyssey movie that is played totally straight, but has a line of dialogue where a dude says 'I told you to fuck off!'"How much of a slop zombie do you have to be to list something that is objectively, universally terrible with no possible way of interpreting it as good (Anachronism) as something you loved?
>>221847883Dougie can't watch a movie over 90 minutes anymore because of his weird dimentia thing where he'll go blank and just pause for like 10 minutes at a time every couple hours. While I agree there's no reason a movie should EVER be more than 100min long, his reasoning are purely physiological due to brain-damage.
>>221850337Can someone please explain what point this ESL is trying to convey?
>>221847915AND SHE'S HOLDING A STOLEN BAT CREDIT CARD??
>>221851701>>Brad: "I had no problem with that."The nolanoid in action.
>>221851701This Brad guy sounds like a NPC.
>>221847737Hes the only reviewer I like. If I ever make movies his opinion would probably be the only one I would care.
>>221853482Jesus dude lmao you suck booooy! (this guy sucks!)
