>>221866754
this movie is anti-reddit because those faggots are vocally "anti-pedo" (despite their actions) and this movie humanizes a pedophile

>>221866754
It was fresh in its time, kiddo.

>>221866754
back when beauty standards meant flat lives matter. now you have to be some ugly thicc fattie to be "beautiful".

>>221866754
The story is trite, but the acting is top tier across the board. I wonder why that Kevin Spacey guy isn't in more stuff nowadays, since he's such a great actor.

>>221866754
Fuck off, this is comfykino

>>221866965
Its 87% in RT while the odyssey is at 96%

>>221866754
Only redditors use reddit as an adjective. It doesn't mean anything.

>>221866754
Good movie, people overhate it

>>221866816
claiming this is a movie about a "pedophile" is in itself incredibly reddit. people didn't consider attraction to a 17yo pedophilia in 1999. it was just a movie about the troubles of a middle-class middle-aged normie male, and the whole point was that he was a relatable everyman. falling in love with your teenage daughter's friend was something that could happen to anyone.

>>221867055
>being sexually attracted to a 17 year old highschooler wasn't considered pedophilia in the 90s
This has to be the most delusional "I hate my generation" zoomer post I've seen in years

>>221866754
She was hot, you all know that if you were Kevin Spacey, you’d follow through

it has fat 16 year old tits in it and youre calling it reddit. homo

>>221867094
you're the zoomer here, retard. nobody called this character a pedophile until maybe 10 years ago. nobody thought mcconaughey played a pedophile in dazed and confused. being into jailbait was not the same thing as being a pedophile, and if you asked people in 1999 about a movie with a pedophile in it, they'd point to something like "happiness," not this. this was a movie about a normal average guy, that's the whole premise, "normal guy's life explodes"

>>221867094
He's completely right. Even americans, puritans who can't deal with sex normally, didn't care that much.

File: whatever-dude-owen-wilson.gif (398 KB, 220x147)

398 KB GIF

>>221867240
I dunno what kind of sick neighbourhood you lived in, man, but OK

how is this movie "reddit"?

>>221867094
Seinfeld was fucking a literal high school student at the height of his fame and it just got him in a couple tabloids.

File: Screenshot 2026-02-22 182320.png (296 KB, 975x694)

296 KB PNG

>>221866754
>garbage is heckin' beautiful!
>yeah buddy

>>221867055
I don’t think being attracted to a 17 year old is bad, I think acting on it is bad. If you aren’t also in your late teens or super early 20s wait until she is 18 it’s not that long a wait.

>>221867446
Still staying sober my dude? Sobriety rocks! Fuck yeah man

>>221866754
there are only two reasons to watch this movie
possibly four reasons

>>221867321
it's fucking insane how easy it is to reprogram retards like you. no, it's not about my neighborhood vs yours. it's about what the entire culture was like. they changed the rules since then and you've literally edited your own memories to believe that's what the rules always were. it's nuts.

let's look at a contemporary review from the most normie, mainstream source possible: roger ebert. ctrl+f "pedo", zero hits. what does he write instead?

>Everything changes for Lester the night he is dragged along by his wife to see their daughter perform as a cheerleader. There on the floor, engrossed in a sub-Fosse pompon routine, he sees his angel: Angela (Mena Suvari), his daughter’s high-school classmate. Is it wrong for a man in his 40s to lust after a teenage girl? Any honest man understands what a complicated question this is. Wrong morally, certainly, and legally. But as every woman knows, men are born with wiring that goes directly from their eyes to their genitals, bypassing the higher centers of thought. They can disapprove of their thoughts, but they cannot stop themselves from having them.
>“American Beauty” is not about a Lolita relationship, anyway. It’s about yearning after youth, respect, power and, of course, beauty. The moment a man stops dreaming is the moment he petrifies inside and starts writing snarfy letters disapproving of paragraphs like the one above. Lester’s thoughts about Angela are impure, but not perverted; he wants to do what men are programmed to do, with the most beautiful woman he has ever seen.

do you really think "doing what men are programmed to do, with a beautiful woman" is a description of pedophilia? this is how people saw the relationship in the movie: as somewhat scandalous, but wholly natural.

>>221866754
>pedo wants to fuck a child
>starring Kevin "age on the clock they're ready for the cock" Spacey
In hindsight it really was obvious he was a nonce.

>>221867645
>you've literally edited your own memories to believe that's what the rules always were
That is true for a lot of things.

>>221867645
> ctrl+f "pedo", zero hits
>Any honest man understands what a complicated question this is. Wrong morally, certainly, and legally.
Do you really need Ebert to say PEDO out loud to understand what he's trying to say?

>>221868235
i understand exactly what he's saying, you don't. i repeat, do you think "doing what men are programmed to do, with a beautiful woman" is a description of pedophilia? because that's his explicit characterization of what lester wants in the story. he tells you he thinks it's normal and natural, twice. he thinks lester's doing something wrong, he does not think lester is a pedophile. other moral wrongs exist.

>>221868791
>do you think "doing what men are programmed to do, with a beautiful woman" is a description of pedophilia?
it is to a pedophile, that's what makes it illegal. ebert is looking at it from lester's eyes.

>>221866754
I bet reddit is older than you, you wetback zoomer.

>>221867094
Keira Knightley did a topless scene in 2001 movie The Hole when she was only 15 and boomers didnt care. Boomers were weird pdf files.

>>221868886
no he isn't. also, here's what he has to say about "lester's eyes":
>Lester’s thoughts about Angela are impure, but not perverted
he tells you explicitly lester is not a pervert. this is "not a lolita relationship." he is not a pedophile. he tells you like four times in the space of two paragraphs that lester is a normal man. quit projecting your 2020s feminism on the 90s and actually read what's being said.

Americans will call a 17 year old a "child" then 6 months later offer the same chid a contract to perform in the nastiest porn.

File: 1740163818963575.jpg (2.12 MB, 2684x3758)

2.12 MB JPG

>Since its original release, The Big Lebowski has become a cult classic.[7] Ardent fans of the film call themselves "achievers".[58][59] Steve Palopoli wrote about the film's emerging cult status in July 2002.[60] He first realized that the film had a cult following when he attended a midnight screening in 2000 at the New Beverly Cinema in Los Angeles and witnessed people quoting dialogue from the film to each other.[11]:129 Soon after the article appeared, the programmer for a local midnight film series in Santa Cruz decided to screen The Big Lebowski and on the first weekend they had to turn away several hundred people. The theater held the film over for six weeks, which had never happened before.[11]:130
>An annual festival, Lebowski Fest, began in Louisville, Kentucky, United States, in 2002 with 150 fans showing up, and has since expanded to several other cities.[61] The festival's main event each year is a night of unlimited bowling with various contests including costume, trivia, hardest- and farthest-traveled contests. Held over a weekend, events typically include a pre-fest party with bands the night before the bowling event as well as a day-long outdoor party with bands, vendor booths and games. Various celebrities from the film have attended some of the events, including Jeff Bridges who attended the Los Angeles event.[61] The British equivalent, inspired by Lebowski Fest, is known as The Dude Abides and is held in London.[62]
>Dudeism, a religion devoted largely to spreading the philosophy and lifestyle of the film's main character, was founded in 2005. Also known as The Church of the Latter-Day Dude (a name parody of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints), the organization has ordained over 220,000 "Dudeist Priests" all over the world via its website.[63]
This is it. This is the most reddit movie ever made.

>>221869094
>he tells you explicitly lester is not a pervert.
because he's looking at it from lester's point of view. he literally called lester's acts morally and legally wrong a sentence ago, which is objectively true and so was in 1999

>muh virginity
lol what a fag

>>221869142
Fandom is Reddit. The Big Lebowski isn't inherently Reddit the same way as something like Everything Everywhere All at Once or Crash (2004) are.

File: tenor-3424039611.gif (3.13 MB, 640x476)

3.13 MB GIF

>>221869196
>The Big Lebowski isn't inherently Reddit

>>221867645
ayo mayne this unc fr wrote an essay about how he wants to fuck high schoolers

>>221869196
>dude weed and constant quips and epic cool guy cowboy sam elliot narrator and punching nazis!
it's as reddit as they come

>>221869336
imagine being a high school boy and having to compete with 38-year-olds for girls your age

>>221869177
>because he's looking at it from lester's point of view.
no, he isn't. "lester's thoughts are not perverted" is ebert's opinion, not lester's. are you retarded?

>he literally called lester's acts morally and legally wrong
and also natural and not perverse, therefore not pedophilic. you can be immoral and not a pedophile. can you wrap your head around that?

>>221869363
I thought they had to compete with OFsimps nowadays.

File: reddit-the-movie.jpg (228 KB, 1000x1481)

228 KB JPG

>>221866872
Don't ask too many questions about Kevin Spacey, or you just might get suicided.

>>221869414
>>221869414
>"lester's thoughts are not perverted" is ebert's opinion
because he's literally talking about lester's subjective POV, thanks for catching up
>>221869414
>and also natural and not perverse, therefore not pedophilic
lol what? just because a pedophile tells you he's in genuine love with a girl that does not make it not pedophilia. it's still morally and legally wrong.

File: 1780763482305.webm (3.93 MB, 562x1000)

3.93 MB WEBM

>>221869363
>What actually happens when 38 year old anon tries to fuck a high school girl

>>221869414
It's not pedophilia because a 17 year old is not a child. It's against USlaws I suppose, but that's it.

File: nigger-reddit.png (1.64 MB, 676x1000)

1.64 MB PNG

>>221869142
>Lebowskifest
>Dudeism
I think these retards missed the point of this near-perfect depiction of every type of boomer movie. It is truly amazing and grand to behold, pulls no punches, and reveals the true face of both boomers and genX in all their indolence, avarice, depravity, myopia, delusions, and completely irrational philosemitism (jews, not Palestinians, sorry, language is just bastardized), yet they treat it as a new religious icon.
The masses are expendable. The jews are right about that much.

picrel another reddit: the movie, and a bigger steaming dung heap I've never seen

>>221869652

lester's thoughts are not perverted = lester's subjective POV is not perverted = 100% true

>a man in his 40s lusting after a teenage girl = objectively BAD morally and legally = also 100% true

>>221869486
>4 female "comedians"
>The token himbo non-comedian guy is still funnier

>>221869690
I wasn't arguing against that.

>>221869717
and they want you to forget it ever happened

>>221869556
nta but what, without looking it up, do you actually think pedophile means?

>>221867404
Everybody hates him now for it, same for Paul Walker. I've seen so many people be happy that Paul died because he was dating a 16 year old in his 30s at one point

>>221867475
The magic 100 day barrier that makes it suddenly okay. As we all know when they turn 18 on the dot they evolve like Pokemon from child (eww gross I would NEVER find a 17 year, 10 month old attractive) to an adult (she's 18 years and 0 days old wow id cum on her tits and eat her pussy! But I wouldn't have 24 hours earlier!)

File: ultimate-boomer-movie.jpg (1.01 MB, 1460x2350)

1.01 MB JPG

>>221869652
You're right, it's not pedophilia, it's just boomer myopia and immorality on display.
Boomers had children just so they could trade them and have something younger to cheat on their wives with.
Boomers put women in the workforce which depressed wages to catastrophic levels and left their wives alone with men in charge of them. Not so shockingly, they became their bosses' sluts.
Boomers ignored their own children to the point that some faggot stoner crying over a plastic bag blowing in the wind seemed attractive to their daughters.
These boomer movies are confessions of their sins, not displays of their virtues, but boomers and their defenders revel in all manner of reprobate behavior. picrel

>>221869773
whatever ebert says is morally or legally wrong in that review, for the sake of the current argument.

>>221869930
>Boomers ignored their own children to the point that some faggot stoner crying over a plastic bag blowing in the wind seemed attractive to their daughters.
kek that's pretty funny. Also Louis Malle was french, you really can't compare him to americans.

>>221869888
>she's 18 years and 0 days old wow id cum on her tits and eat her pussy
This is the problem, jew.
>But I wouldn't have 24 hours earlier
This is not the problem, jew.
Fucking is for marriage. The future is ultra-fascist.

>>221867094
>being sexually attracted to a 17 year old highschooler wasn't considered pedophilia in the 90s
And still isn't today

>>221869993
No. Pedophile was brought out before that review was mentioned. what is your definition of pedophile.

>>221869177
It's morally wrong because she's a lot younger, he's married, it's his daughters friend
It's legally wrong because she's under the age of consent
But we can all be grown up enough to agree that she's not a literal child, she's 17, so it's not pedophilia

>>221870148
we're talking about the review here so my point stands

>>221870083
>And still isn't today
Yes it is what are you talking about? Callmecarson would still have a career if he wasn't cancelled for sexting 17 year old (when he was 19)

>>221870208
Under the age of consent is not the same as pedophilia

Glad we cleared that up

>>221870233
>under
Age of consent isn't 18 everywhere, even in the usa.

>>221869556
>because he's literally talking about lester's subjective POV
he absolutely is not. "lester's thoughts are not perverted" is not a statement made from lester's subjective pov. it's ebert's actual assessment of lester, made from ebert's pov as a critic. so is, by the way, his description of the girl as a "beautiful woman."

>lol what?
pedophilia is a sexual targeting disorder, a perversion. when ebert tells you he does not consider lester's fantasies perverse, he is also telling you he does not consider them pedophilic, because pedophilia is a form of perversion. this is simply factual: ebert does not consider lester a pedophile, and neither did the rest of society in 1999. the extension of the term pedophile to people like lester, ie sexually healthy regular men, is a feminist project that only really took root over the last decade or so. ebert's comments about lester's desires being wrong morally has nothing to do with this project, and with the sexual disorder of pedophilia.

File: 1567985383795.gif (1.79 MB, 400x225)

1.79 MB GIF

>>221867645
>>The moment a man stops dreaming is the moment he petrifies inside and starts writing snarfy letters disapproving of paragraphs
Prescient

>>221869299
>>221869352
Identifying with the dude is Reddit. Laughing at the expense of the dude isn't Reddit. What about this do you not understand?

>>221867446
the dude was also clearly autistic, or slightly mental, because of his parents. I think you might need to rewatch the movie, it's a very fine detail that most viewers tend to miss.

>>221870317
Exactly
Pedophilia is an attraction to prepubescent children, not attraction to young women who happen to be under the legal age of consent in whatever territory you're currently stood in

Sure there's a grey area, but in the movie the girl is well outside it

in 1999 people didn't even consider roman polanski a pedophile, and he admitted to fucking a 13yo girl up the ass

>>221869352
>and punching nazis!
they're nihilists retard, not nazis. If you wanna seethe like a fag at least get your shit straight.

>>221870456
what??

>>221869811
>Everybody hates him now for it
it's because of this and his refusal to recognize Palestine lmao.

>>221869299
the dude has way too much charisma and women to be reddit

>>221870456
Well... Someone did because he fled the usa over it

>>221866754
why did this movies get me weewee hard

>>221869032
Thanks.

>>221869032
Oh wow I never knew that. Insane how a bunch of adults telling kids to get naked in front of them is legal because it's "art".

File: 1533551706314.jpg (180 KB, 777x1000)

180 KB JPG

>>221869930
>>221867094
>YOU'RE A ZOOMER AND YOU'RE A PEDO!
>W-WAIT, ACTUALLY YOU'RE A BOOMER AND YOU'RE A PEDO!!
>J-J-JUST STOP LUSTING AFTER YOUNG GIRLS OK?! HOW CAN I FUCK THEM OTHERWISE?!?!!
Spoiler:you won't, and this does not depend on whether boomers are going fishing for them or not. You could be alone on an island with 100 stacies and beckies in their early 20s and you would not see a single crumb of pussy even after a century.

You being an unattractive loser is intrinsic of you, the competition just makes it more apparent. You would be one even if you were the last man on Earth.

>>221870334
>"lester's thoughts are not perverted" is not a statement made from lester's subjective pov
it is. that's why he said "lester's thoughts are not perverted", not "lester's is objectively not a pervert"

>>221870644
You zoomies are so hopelessly repressed. Stop radiating ick. That's the best advice you will ever hear.

>>221870700
You lost, you can stop trolling now

>>221870891
>trolling
You are too generous. He's just retarded.

>>221870680
Who the fuck ever said I wanted to fuck. jew? I hate myself, I hate biology, I hate this world, I hate existence, and I hate you, jewjeet.
I'm a volcel, but you will never be a woman, coprophagist.

>>221870891
I accept your concession, you can resort to coping now

File: jeet elephant.webm (3.28 MB, 720x406)

3.28 MB WEBM

>>221870680
>>221870952
Forgot to add: your first tag is me, second tag is someone else.
Stop thinking you know exactly which IDless user posted which posts, retard. This isn't /pol/.

rewatched it after the whole epstein shit, and seeing Kevin Spacey play the unshakeable straight guy while the Nazi guy is a closeted faggot was hilarious

>>221870996
>>221870952
>>221870891
>>221870776
>>221870700
all me btw

>>221870700
a statement made from lester's pov would be "lester doesn't think his thoughts are perverse." that's not what ebert's saying. ebert's saying that he, ebert, does not find lester's desire for the girl perverse. it therefore follows he does not find it pedophilic.

>>221870776
Do you have children? Let them get naked in front of a bunch of HOLLYWOOD JEW PEDOPHILES (did you forget that they're all Jew pedos fucking retard) and be okay with it faggot cuck. Kill yourself worthless dip shit faggot.

File: dark-settings.png (12 KB, 572x221)

12 KB PNG

>>221871033
You don't even use the same color settings I use.

>>221866754
reddit derangement syndrome

>>221867055
The movie is about a man going through a mid-life crisis, and his daughter's friend personifies everything he supposedly 'lost' after his young and wild and happier nostalgic teenage years. It's sort of retelling Lolita in a way, except the dude has an epiphany where he realizes what he's about to do is wrong and DOESN'T fuck the girl at the end. I almost tear up when he wraps the blanket around her.

And the problem I see here in this thread, and pretty much everywhere else right now, is the word 'pedophile' used to have a very specific dictionary meaning. And I'm not even doing the pedo vs hebes argument. It gets thrown around so much that it has lost its impact. This same crowd will call Leonardo DiCaprio a pedophile, even though the women he dates are quite legally able to give consent. Is every bloated 50-year-old who has a thought about sinking his boner into a 22-year-old a fucking pedophile? A woman in her 20s is not 12, and a 17-year-old isn't four foot five, flat, and hairless. Shut the fuck up already.

>>221870586
i mean "people" as in public opinion, which ended up enormously on his side, and that's why he was able to continue making expensive movies with hollywood stars in them for decades after the scandal.
>>221870493
see above.

>>221870360
>I'm not gay I just love watching gay porn ironically!

>>221871037
>but MUH kids shouldn't be naked in a movie
so just don't do it, retard? nobody's going to force your ugly-ass kids into a film. let other people make their own decisions.

File: jlaw.jpg (392 KB, 2000x1516)

392 KB JPG

>>221871197
Nah, Polanski is just a jew, and typically satanic. The jews always escape justice, unless the rest of the jews decide to use one lesser jew as a sacrificial scapegoat.
picunrel lol

>>221871325
gay cope from a jew fetishist. public opinion was on polanski's side and isn't anymore because of a shift from a masculine to a feminine foundation of public morality. non-jew rock stars fucked and even publicly dated girls the same age as polanski's and nobody cared about that, either. polanski was also predominantly seen as a polack, not as a jew.

>>221871555
>because of a shift from a masculine to a feminine foundation of public morality
It's mostly because of Me Too, probably also thanks to Epstein and rightoids spreading their anti-elite propaganda.
The infamous petition to release Polanski signed by so many actors and directors was from 2009, which is relatively recently.

>>221871037
Holy zoomie mald. You are distilled ick. No wonder you are single like the rest of the men in your generation. Your women don't like this insecurity, grow up.

>>221871271
you're an unironic faggot

>>221871555
>gay cope
That's literally every male jew's entire life, jewjeetbro.
We (nationalists) hate people like Ted Nugent. We will all enjoy watching that miscegenating pedophile burn in hell, shlomo.
You can't even bench half your weight btw.

>>221871271
This >>221871831. You're a fag.

File: shidderator shiddertron 3000.png (487 KB, 1200x1200)

487 KB PNG

>>221871743
>jewish and shabbos goy actors and directors wanted a jewish pedophile rapist sodomite released
Oh shid ur rite the nationalists just lost the argument.

File: 1769549344547720.png (577 KB, 4068x3200)

577 KB PNG

>>221866993
it's like reddit spacing

>>221866993
>t. redditor
>>221872412
2016 was peak Reddit and 4chan started more actively calling them out and making them feel unwelcome, newfag.

>>221871831
>>221872387
why are you so mad? how hard is it to just admit that the film is reddit incarnate and you enjoy it anyway? it's not like it's even up to debate, it still has an active subreddit 28 years after it first released, it's an objective fact

File: 1325982701916.png (29 KB, 750x743)

29 KB PNG

>>221870961
>I'm a volcel
lmao sure

>>221872376
of course you hate the successful. that's also the source of your unending butthurt about jews. that's why you had to invent heaven and hell, so you could tell yourself the winners will be made into losers and you into a winner in some other dimension, ironically one ruled by a sorcerer jew. it's pathetic, impotent seethe.

File: 2004.png (78 KB, 1029x1602)

78 KB PNG

>>221872535
Hmmm...

File: 1348472152389.gif (1.8 MB, 282x257)

1.8 MB GIF

>>221870996
>Forgot to add: your first tag is me, second tag is someone else.
Same as in your post, retard.
But your lie is not believable because you "somehow" continued to argue a point that wasn't yours in the first place, a point that was also very, very retarded.

Just take the L and stop posting for the day.

>>221872408
>nooooo polanski must be drawn and quartered for his crimes against feminism!
- guy who wants you to think he's "right wing"

>>221866754
>broken man lusts after underage girl
Pretty sure this is the 4channest (post 2016) movie of all time actually

>>221872691
boy oh boy I wonder from who such an unbiased point of view could come from

>>221869811
Yes, NOW. Before it wasn’t even mentioned by anyone beside Howard stern, and he was straight up taking her to galas and shit.

In the 70s two 17 year olds sucked popsicles on network television. The joke was that it was like they were sucking cock, get it?
I’m not saying it’s right, it was just the truth.

>>221867055
>falling in love with your teenage daughter's friend was something that could happen to anyone
???

File: Spoiler Image (2.84 MB, 419x313)

2.84 MB GIF

>>221872847
oh wow I wonder WHY such a SFW, textless image would be deleted!
gee oh gee I hope there's nobody here trying to manipulate the public image of the ethnic group he belongs to!

>>221872918
what do you not understand? healthy men are attracted to women past puberty. your teenage daughter's friend is a woman past puberty. it might therefore happen to any normal man that he could fall for his teenage daughter's friend. shakespeare's juliet was 13 btw.

>>221872847
you, retard. the idea that jews win everything, control everything and you are forever their powerless victim is your worldview. to me, jews are just some guys that like money. so what? i like money.

>>221873280
falling in love with and considering attractive are two very different things and juliet's age gap was not 30 years
as a matter of fact why are you now adjusting down to 13yos unsolicited

File: Spoiler Image (63 KB, 475x356)

63 KB JPG

>>221873366
>you, retard
I see! Then you do not actually think jews are successful, do you? But why would that be???

>>221866754
Great flick. I wished the main character would have a better ending though

>>221872658
You're wrong on the internet, anon. Stop making a big deal about it.

>>221872693
That doesn't contradict anything I wrote and I've been familiar with this site since back when it was only /b and "feels good man" was a thing.

>>221866754
You’ve got the Redditors seething at the truth. This is a Reddit movie

File: Spoiler Image (22 KB, 548x364)

22 KB JPG

>>221873916
Do you want to see the most beautiful thing I've ever posted?

>>221867404
I know you guys have made this 30 year old relationship the whole of your personality, but Jerry didn't start dating her until after she turned 18 and graduated from high school.

This is noted drug addict, confirmed-cum eater and cuckold, and child abuser Nick Rekieta's favorite movie.

>>221866754
probably the only movie ever made where every single character with more than 15 words of dialoge is despicable

>>221874166
Saar

>>221866816
misuse of the word pedophile is normiecore, even worse than reddit.

>>221871804
Kill yourself pedo faggot

>>221874452
Ok pedo

^ this retard should kill himself

>>221866754
it's 100% pure kino

>>221874640
Its reddit

>>221866754
hating this movie is low t behavior. op is trooning.

>>221874499
>>221874500
You have such a sad life, obsessing over who meets your obscure and ever evolving criteria for a pedo. You give women the ick and weird out everyone. Be better.

File: 1760578351025.gif (98 KB, 220x165)

98 KB GIF

>>221867240

File: MV5BNDYwNzVjMTItZmU5YS00Y(...).jpg (92 KB, 1000x1450)

92 KB JPG

>>221866754
Everyone defending it proving they aren't Redditors by going on overdramatic screeds about how a movie that glorifies the mediocre normalcy of American suburbia is actually a magnum opus aligned with their worldview

Anyway, picrel is my choice

>>221875710
Thats just normie core