Is this what chuds wanted Helen to look like? Would they get on 1000 ships and suffer 10 years of brutal hand to hand combat on a beach for this?
>>221988299>chudsJust say white trash. It's OK. It's what they are. Calling them anything else just distracts from the fact they're failures at life.
>>221988366Most chuds are indian, though.
>Would they get on 1000 ships and suffer 10 years of brutal hand to hand combat on a beach for this?No because Odysseus would still be Matt Damon
>>221988299She has childlike body proportions. No wonder Republicans love her.
>>221988395Chud means victory
>>221988366I dont think theyre white
>>221988299Just hire a hot Greek chick, it's not that hard.
>>221988417is that how people describe non-fat women now?
>>221988299sure, anything better than the black one.
>>221988299Her face is busted, body is dimes
Indians would die for this
>>221988461No, people with creepy quasi-midge like body proportions. Not talking about weight. If anything she's on the chubby side for my tastes.
>>221988366I don't know enough about US stereotypes, but every time I see someone seethe about "niggers" in a thread, I have an image of a sweaty high-browed pasty white dude that would pass as an extra in Blackkklansman
>>221988563>everyone i don’t dont like is uglyi dont even need to stoop to calling you ugly because youre just retarded
>>221988366You'd be shocked how many pedophile chud geeks are Indians or Hispanics
>>221988299If by chuds you mean literally everyone with a pulse? Yes.
Ah sweet another Indian simp thread
>>221988299Wow, a mediocre blonde with big tits doing stupid thirst trap shit. How erotic.
>>221988366guillotine this one
>>221988299By Bronze Age standards yes she would have been a 10/10 bombshell goddess. Today, debatable. Just look at photos of mistresses and social climbers/femmes fatales from the late 19th and early 20th century, the kind of women who turned royalty and industrialists into simps, to get an idea of what was considered a beautiful woman back then.
>>221988299no this is fine. would you like a penis with that?https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Pov0MKuyJfg&ra=m
>>221988638She's too short for me.
I want a big-beaked Med with raven-dark curls!!!
>>221988756Using the late 19th century to make assumptions about Bronze Age beauty standards is a HUGE leap.
>>221988484Exactly how I feel about her, too.
>>221988858
>>221988299Legs too short, wouldn't fuck.
>>221988864My point is that the standard was much lower due to lower accessibility to such women, less developed media, lower population, higher wealth inequality (meaning a lot of these women would have been socially invisible peasants), etc. I mean, picrel was considered a beautiful and desirable woman in the 1890s, she had multiple members of the Russian imperial family simping for her. So beauty standards were for sure much lower in the Bronze Age.
>>221988417your mind has childlike proportions
