Seventeen years after the June 1994 dinner at Mezzaluna, Denise's son, a 25-year-old Sean Brown, will be arrested for domestic violence. On December 27th, 2011, Denise's son will be removed from his apartment by police at 2:30 a.m. after beating up his girlfriend, 22-year-old Amy Johnson. Photos taken after the arrest will show Johnson bearing clear evidence of Sean's physical assault, in the form of swollen welts and scratches around her neck.

Since Sean had been raised fatherless from birth in his maternal family's home, his violent behavior could not have been learned from an absent father. Nor, indeed, could it have been learned in a vacuum. Sean's volatile temper and tendency towards violence were both shared in common with other Brown family members, including his aunt Nicole. Both had grown up in the same home environment overseen by Lou and Juditha Brown. The only distinction is that, unlike his aunt Nicole, Sean was too young to have been exposed to the ideology of Juditha's father and ex-Nazi prison guard, Josef Baur, during his formative years. While Sean had grown up in the exact same Dana Point family home, his great- grandfather Josef, who helped raise the previous generation of Browns to be proud of their ‘Aryan' heritage, had already been dead for seven years by the time of Sean's birth in February 1986.

After Sean Brown's domestic abuse incident and arrest, his mother Denise will no longer make false public claims that violence was endemic within the Simpson family and did not exist within that of the Browns: Her batterer son's exclusive Brown-family upbringing disproved that once and for all. It is also after this 2011 incident that Denise Brown will abandon her self-appointed mission to save women from domestic abuse through her Nicole Brown Simpson Foundation, a charity riddled with controversy since its inception in 1994.

>>222143350
Some schizo redpilled me on how OJ's crazy son actually did it and he made a pretty convincing case.

>>222143845
OJ and his son have different DNA. Ojs DNA was at the scene of the crime because he cut himself during attack.

Nicole Brown Simpson's final meal will be the last time she picks up her family's tab - at least while still alive. After this secret farewell dinner unknowingly held at Nicole's own expense, her hitherto inconsequential parents and siblings will become famous in their own right; able to secure the best table at any restaurant without the aid of Nicole and the social currency of her ex-husband, O.J. Simpson, to do so. This is because, in the next 24 hours, the fortunes of the obscure Brown family and the internationally celebrated O.J. Simpson will be completely reversed.

Recognized around the world, Nicole's millionaire ex- husband will be accused of killing her by Brown family members who are fully aware that he is 1750 miles away in Chicago. Even after a murder trial that will find defendant Orenthal James “O.J.” Simpson not guilty, he will already have been presumed guilty and disowned by those who once boasted his friendship and patronage.

At the exact same rate his star fades, the star of Nicole's parents and siblings will rise. While Brown family members will be fêted wherever they choose, Simpson will no longer be welcomed in most local restaurants; even his decades-long golf and country club memberships will be revoked. Meanwhile, the Browns will become media darlings, wined and dined and endlessly sought after by hungry journalists and news corporations clamoring for press interviews and television appearances from the late Nicole Brown Simpson's family.

>>222143845
You're both low IQ.
>>222143876
Oj's DNA was there because it was planted

>>222143350
The glove did fit.

He did it.

The prosecution's argument also ignored the fact that if O.J. Simpson had truly been a vengeful, spiteful, sadistic man, he would have relished the opportunity to use Nicole's income tax fraud as the means to destroy her. If the football star had wanted to punish Nicole for leaving him and seeking the company of other men, there would have been no better way than to report her to the Internal Revenue Service. Watching the IRS pounce on his ex-wife, seize her home and all of her possessions before sending her to prison where she could no longer even see her children, Sydney and Justin, would have been infinitely more satisfying than simply killing her. If Nicole's 'crime' in the eyes of her allegedly jealous ex- husband was in seeking her freedom, then the best revenge for that jealous ex-husband would have been to watch her languish in federal prison.

Yet, not only did O.J. Simpson not do this, he warned Nicole off of her ill-advised tax evasion scheme with his June 6th letter. Annoyed though he was, he did not wish to see his ex-wife and the mother of his children in prison. He was obviously concerned about her future; if he wasn't, he would have reported her to the IRS immediately and let the chips fall where they may. In any event, the idea that a man who planned to commit murder would bother with warning his chosen victim against defrauding the IRS when she would be dead in a week's time anyway is preposterous, to say the least.

>>222143876
I think he was there at some point following the murder and had to debate whether he wanted to sell his own flesh and blood down the river, or take the charge himself. I think it better explains his reaction during the Bronco chase.

>>222144059
It's tougher to murder someone when they're locked in a prison cell and you're on the outside

>>222144002
I forgot that the lapd traveled around with their special vials of OJ Simpson DNA

Now facing the possibility of charges over income tax fraud, Nicole decided that the only way forward was to 'correct' her crime by putting her Brentwood residence on South Bundy Drive up for lease, making it a rental property in earnest. As for herself, Nicole would move to Malibu.

According to Jeane McKenna, Nicole's real estate agent, this planned move to Malibu was just a few days away, as of June 12th. With McKenna's assistance, Nicole had found a four-bedroom house to rent in Malibu over 21 miles away from her Brentwood townhome.

Nicole's relocation to Malibu would have made it harder if not impossible for the murder conspirators to frame O.J. Simpson for her murder. With a 21-mile distance between O.J.'s Brentwood, Los Angeles neighborhood and Nicole's Malibu neighborhood, a plausible window of opportunity for the crime would be difficult to establish. For such a false timeline to work, O.J. would have to be available to make the 21-mile drive to Nicole's new residence in Malibu, kill her and a second victim and then drive the 21 miles back to his estate. However, O.J. was a very busy man, so any alleged 40-plus mile drive undertaken by the football star on any given day or night would have been too much for the murder conspirators to account for. What's more, they did not know anything about Nicole's new home, being unfamiliar with its layout as well as the Malibu neighbors and their routines.

By June 12th, 1994, the murder conspirators were down to the wire. Nicole would be moving to Malibu in a couple of weeks, placing herself over 21 miles from O.J.'s home and at least a 45-minute drive round-trip. Further complicating matters was the fact that O.J. traveled out of state on a regular basis, so much so that it would be impossible to coordinate a future date at which the conspirators could pull off their plans to murder Nicole and a second victim while framing O.J. for the crime. It was either now or never

While Nicole and Cora sat in discussion at the Fischman family home in Brentwood, a woman identifying herself as "Nicole" telephoned the hotline at Sojourn House, a private battered woman's shelter in nearby Santa Monica, California.

Nancy Ney, Sojourn House's hotline operator, documented the call made at 11:00 a.m. by a woman who identified herself only as "Nicole". "Nicole" said she was 34, divorced after eight years of marriage and had two children, a boy and a girl. She said she lived in West Los Angeles and that her husband was a high-profile figure who Ney would recognize if she heard his name. According to Ney, the woman talked about being stalked by her ex-husband and receiving a death threat. The woman wondered if it would be safer if she moved back in with him.

This "Nicole" was not Nicole Brown Simpson because of the timing of the telephone call. During the morning of June 7th, 1994, she was busy complaining to Cora Fischman. Also, the real Nicole Brown Simpson was 35 years old and had been married seven years before her divorce.

This telephone call was not a cry for help from an abused woman but was, in fact, a set-up. The call was intentionally made close enough to the murder date for the hotline operator to remember the similarities between the conversation with this "Nicole" and what would be said to the police and media after the murders by Denise Brown, the real Nicole's look-alike and sound-alike-sister.

File: Norm OJ.jpg (21 KB, 513x389)

21 KB JPG

>>222143350
So OJ didn't brutally kill his wife?

File: Marge DNA.jpg (64 KB, 640x480)

64 KB JPG

>>222144002
Bullshit.
PCR DNA testing became the standard after the trial; no way anyone was thinking about "planting DNA evidence" before everyone knew that shit was admissible in court.
Everyone realized after the trial how damning it was after the trial but this was all new genetic science for the jurors (we just used blood tests before this, but that only told you if someone had the same blood type, like family member).

On Wednesday, June 8th, 1994, five-year-old Justin Simpson celebrated his kindergarten graduation ceremony. Held at the private school he had attended over the previous year, Justin's father, O.J. Simpson was out of state on business and was unable to attend. Justin's mother, Nicole Brown Simpson, did attend the ceremony, as did her parents, Lou and Juditha Brown. Afterward, Justin's maternal grandparents stayed in Los Angeles to visit with Nicole at her residence on South Bundy Drive, in Brentwood.

After her mother and father's visit and just before her murder, Nicole discovered that an extra set of her house keys had gone missing. This spare set, which Nicole kept in her kitchen, included a house key and a remote garage door opener. On their disappearance, no one could say exactly when they had gone missing, or where they had gone to.

After the murders, Nicole's parents and siblings, including Nicole's half-brother, Rolf Baur, made sure to tell the police and media about the missing keys. Nicole's family claimed that she had informed them of the missing keys out of concern that O.J. Simpson had taken them in the first week of June. However, this is not what Nicole Brown Simpson told Cora Fischman, her best friend and the first person to be informed of the missing set of extra keys by Nicole. According to Fischman, the discovery left Nicole unfazed and unconcerned, as she told civil attorney Daniel Petrocelli during her March 20th, 1996 deposition:

Cora Fischman: "Well, we were gonna go for a run, and then she [Nicole] noticed that her key was missing. She said 'Oh, my key is missing. I can't find it.' So I said, 'Okay, fine, we'll run.' That was the conversation that we had."

>>222143845
One person gutting two people without a commotion w in a busy neighborhood with plenty of foot traffic was always pants on head retarded

>>222144647
Casually tossing her house key into the bushes outside of her locked security gate near the public street would be something beyond consideration for any woman who thought she was being watched, spied upon or stalked - and yet Nicole Brown Simpson did just that for the last six months of her life, every time she went jogging. These facts contradict the Brown family's testimony and public media interviews that Nicole was living in fear over the possibility that O.J. Simpson had stolen her house key - a story that begs the question: Why would 'stalker' O.J. ever have to go through the trouble of stealing a set of spare keys from inside Nicole's house, when he could simply watch her drop her house key into the bushes before a jogging session, then pick it up at his own convenience?

Incidentally, not one member of Nicole's family tried to get her to change her locks after the discovery of the missing keys. If Nicole's key had gone missing before June 8th, when her parents visited her home, surely they would have insisted that she call a locksmith to change the locks for her safety? Naturally, they did no such thing, as new locks installed so close to the murder date might have kept them out of the house when they needed to gain entry, to carry out their plot.

>>222144570
You beat me to it. DNA testing was new at the time. It's part of the reason OJ got off because juries at the time didn't understand the importance of DNA at crimes scenes.

Despite alleging to have driven home to Dana Point from Brentwood immediately after finishing their final meal with Nicole Brown Simpson around 8:45 p.m., neither one of Nicole's parents or siblings who had spent that afternoon and evening with her in Los Angeles had an alibi during her murder. This is because their collective alibi, based on a single phone call made from the Brown family residence at 9:37 p.m., is wholly dependent upon the Browns having arrived home in Dana Point within 30 minutes of leaving Brentwood. As Dana Point is located 75 miles down the coast of California from the Los Angeles suburb of Brentwood minimum hour-and-a-half drive by car - this is, of course, impossible. With no evidence that Lou, Juditha, Denise or Dominique Brown actually left Brentwood on the night of Nicole's murder, it is entirely conceivable that the pair spotted by Thomas Tallerino at 875 South Bundy Drive were in fact two unaccounted-for Brown family members.

Was the woman petite Dominique Brown, Nicole's younger sister, with her slight figure and long, dark hair? Was the light-skinned man Nicole's half-brother and former gardener, Rolf Baur, a man for whom no alibi was ever required by police? Was the former Simpson estate gardener assuming a natural posture as he crouched in the bushes outside his half-sister Nicole's house one hour before her murder? These questions remain unanswered to this day. As with the 'stooped man' witnessed by Tom Lang, Los Angeles police made no attempt to identify these two potential suspects in a homicide case seen by Thomas Tallerino just outside the primary victim's home one hour before her death.

>>222144757
Of all the witnesses ignored or quashed by prosecutors Marcia Clark and William Hodgman, perhaps the most egregious was the suppression of Robert Berman. For what possible reason would the lead prosecutor in a homicide case not call on the last man to visit the victim's home to testify at a criminal trial concerning her murder? In what possible way could Berman's testimony have harmed the prosecution's case, when all he had done was to make a brief visit to 875 South Bundy Drive before driving off with his eight-year-old daughter, Rachel?

Perhaps the reason Robert Berman was not called to testify as a witness at any point was that the woman he had spoken to on Nicole's front porch before collecting his daughter - a woman who, by all accounts, should have been Nicole was not, in fact, Nicole.

Perhaps the woman who answered the door was not wearing the black dress worn by Nicole at the restaurant dinner 15 minutes earlier - the same black dress she wore when she was found murdered. Perhaps the woman who answered the door was wearing something completely different altogether. Perhaps this woman had only looked like Nicole and sounded like Nicole, as her sister Denise Brown did, with her head covered by a towel or baseball cap to conceal her dark brown hair while she impersonated Nicole for an unsuspecting Berman. Perhaps these and other details of the encounter with 'Nicole', when recalled by Berman in a police interview, raised red flags for Hodgman and Clark at the Los Angeles District Attorney's office. As Robert Berman made no testimony in court and the content of any police or DA interview he may have given was never made public, these possibilities remain. In any event, there was clearly something about Berman's visit to 875 South Bundy Drive that had left the deputy district attorneys determined to not only quash his story, but to erase both Berman and his daughter from the prosecution's timeline altogether.

On March 22nd, 1996, Dr. Reichardt, a physician of chiropractic medicine with 13 years' experience and a friend of O.J. Simpson, was deposed for the civil trial. In his deposition, Dr. Reichardt described a good friend of O.J. Simpson's who, in 1994, had been willing to testify about Simpson's normal demeanor during the early evening of June 12th, 1994. This unnamed friend was interviewed by Los Angeles Police Department detectives and then threatened by prosecutors at the Los Angeles District Attorney's office, who told the man that if he testified about having a normal and pleasant interaction with Simpson during the afternoon and early evening of June 12th, 1994, the LAPD and LADA would ruin his career.

Dr. Reichardt also testified that Candace Garvey, a patient and trial witness for the prosecution during the 1995 criminal trial, shared with him a similar experience:

"Candace Garvey came to my office one day, and it was in December of '94, she came in for treatment three, four times in a row for headaches, and I asked her, 'Candace, what's going on? You're very nervous. What's happening?' And she said, The prosecution team is driving me nuts.' And I said, What's up?" Her answer was that they wanted her to change her story of what happened at the evening of the recital. And I said, 'Candace, look, just stick to what you know. You know what happened. Just keep saying what you know what happened. That's it.' Well, she explained to me that O.J. at that night to her seemed quieter, seemed tired, but he seemed pretty normal to her. However, whenever her date was in the court, she gets up in the court and says in what gloomy mood he was. So I know she changed her testimony. I want to know why."

I don't understand, why would the Browns be involved in a conspiracy to murder Nicole and frame oj?

>>222145627
The true reason O.J. Simpson found himself accused of the murder of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, is because her parents, Louis and Juditha Brown, did not want to move out of the home that O.J. Simpson owned; a home which, at the time of the murders, had been their residence for 20 years in Dana Point, California.

As shocking a fact as this is, it is not unprecedented. Individuals have murdered for less. Parents have conspired to murder their own children since time immemorial. So too have siblings, who murder one another. As no one knew anything about Nicole's parents or siblings either before or after her murder, the possibility of their having a motive for killing her was neither officially explored nor established.

Prosecutor Marcia Clark wrote in her book on the 1994 murder investigation and 1995 criminal trial, Without a Doubt, that she did not like the Brown family members. At best, they were difficult, uncooperative, and behaved oddly. This was a direct contrast to their public image as a caring family tearfully grieving the loss of a beloved daughter and sister while demanding justice. The more Clark had dealings with the Browns, the more she found them to be secretive, callous, greedy and highly dysfunctional.

After the Simpson marriage ended in 1992, Nicole's parents, fearful of eviction, would stop at nothing to stay in the house that legally belonged to - and had been paid for by O.J. Simpson, now their former son-in-law. After the divorce, the once dependable and generous football star was no longer bound by any familial obligations to his now-ex- wife's relatives, which included paying for and providing a roof over their head, as he had dutifully done in the past.

how did OJ know there wasn't anyone else on the way to Nicole's place after the unexpected visit from Ron Goldman?

File: Screenshot_20260722-140332.png (373 KB, 843x688)

373 KB PNG

At that time, Simpson was planning to sell off his California properties and relocate to Florida. This would include the house in Dana Point in which Nicole's parents and sisters resided, a fact they well knew. Now faced with the real prospect of being turned out of O.J.'s Dana Point house and having to find a new place to call home, the Browns concluded that the only way out of this situation was to frame the deed-holder for murder before he could evict them - even if the victim chosen for the bloody sacrifice would be one of their own: Nicole.

Murdering O.J. Simpson himself would not have solved the Brown family's problems. This is because Simpson's two adult children from a previous marriage, Arnelle and Jason, would have shared in their father's inheritance. Upon coming into possession of the Dana Point house, the elder Simpson children would not have hesitated to evict the Browns from the property before liquidating it, along with the other real estate assets bequeathed them by their late father. No, murdering Simpson himself would not have prevented or indeed even delayed the Browns from being evicted. He would have to be neutralized in some other, equally permanent way.

Of course, they could not have pulled off one of the greatest frame jobs of all time without help. The unambitious and uneducated family headed by Lou and Juditha Brown did not have the brains to pull off such an elaborate murder plot alone. They had a team, and each team member had a role. Theirs was a coordinated ensemble of coconspirators, each one vital to the success of the double homicide and damning implication of the innocent man who would find himself accused of committing the grisly act.

File: images_2141df37-3d3b-4d.jpg (17 KB, 387x516)

17 KB JPG

On the day after the murders, June 13th, 1994, Los Angeles police and Marcia Clark discovered the deed to Lou Brown's Dana Point residence during a search of O.J. Simpson's home. As it turned out, Simpson had owned the Brown family home for several years, first taking ownership of it during his marriage to Nicole. He remained its owner for the two years after their divorce, and would continue to own the house for years afterward. This naturally meant that, at the time of Nicole's murder, the legal owner of the home occupied by the Brown family was, in fact, O.J. Simpson.

This crucially significant fact was never disclosed to either the news media or to the public, and certainly not to the jury. Had the police or district attorney informed the public, media and jury that O.J. Simpson held the deed to the home occupied by Nicole's mother, father and three adult sisters, it would have established a motive for murder on their part. For, unlike the murder's prime and only suspect - a man who stood to gain nothing from his ex-wife's death - Nicole's parents and siblings were the crime's sole beneficiaries: By killing Nicole and framing O.J., the family who once feared eviction could live in that Dana Point house for the rest of their lives.

"Mr. Brown," Sawyer pressed during the prerecorded broadcast of the interview on September 15th, 1994, "it has been reported that be [O.J. Simpson] got a Hertz dealership for you, that was the support of the family."

"We wish," scoffed Dominique Brown, Lou's 29-year-old daughter who, like her father, had been equally dependent upon O.J. Simpson's charity while equally capable of supporting herself.

“My tax returns show that was not much of a support, I'm afraid,” Lou Brown answered Sawyer drily.

At the Brown family patriarch's retort, his wife Juditha and daughters Denise, Dominique and Tanya broke into hearty laughter as if on cue. Diane Sawyer, whose reaction to the scene was left in the Primetime Live special's final cut, appeared visibly confused by the inappropriate levity of the family she was in the process of interviewing. Nicole Brown Simpson had just been murdered; that is why Sawyer had been assigned to interview her parents and sisters in the first place. And yet, before her very eyes - and the Primetime Live film crew - Nicole's family were making light of the situation by casually trading banal quips about Lou Brown's taxes and
then laughing in concert in a manner that appeared bizarrely rehearsed. This was clearly not the behavior of a somber and stoic family broken by grief and devastated by tragedy that Diane Sawyer had been expecting.

>>222146715
How could they live there for the rest of their lives if OJ was convicted? I don't understand. Wouldn't he still be able to sell the place either during his trial or afterwards, even if he had been convicted?

"I'm terribly sorry to have to inform you about this, Mr. Brown, but your daughter has been killed at her home."

Detective Lange became aware that another member of the family - Nicole's sister, Denise Brown - had answered the telephone at the same time as her father. Denise would later claim that she was at the telephone in the kitchen when she picked up the receiver at that same moment. Indeed, it was as if Denise and her father had been waiting by their respective telephones in two separate rooms to receive this one very important, very expected phone call at the crack of dawn.

Detective Lange had not identified himself as a homicide detective, nor disclosed that Nicole had been murdered. Denise, nevertheless, reacted instantaneously. Without having asked for a single clarifying detail about her sister's death from the detective, she began to scream into the phone as if on cue:

"I knew he'd do it! I knew that motherfucker would kill her! I knew it! I knew it! O.J. did it! O.J. killed her! I knew that son of a bitch was going to do it!"

At this point, the telephone call to the Brown family home became even more surreal for Detective Lange, as it was recounted in Evidence Dismissed, Lange's 1997 book on the murder investigation and trial written in collaboration with Detective Phillip Vannatter and author Dan E. Moldea: As Lange attempted to resume his original conversation with Lou Brown, he could hear an unidentified "growing wave of wailing female voices" on the other end of the line begin to chant, as if in a Greek chorus:

"O.J. did it! O.J. did it! O.J. did it!"

>>222147872
They would have won the civil trial even faster in that case.

>>222147986
At the outset of his death notification call to Nicole Brown Simpson's family, Detective Lange never said when she died, or how. "Killed at her home" could mean an accident:
Falling off a stepladder while changing a light bulb; electrocuted by a faulty electrical appliance; falling down stairs; asphyxiation from a gas leak; a house fire. Nicole could just as well have been "killed at her home" by a completely unintentional household occurrence. Had Lange used a less passively phrased description than "killed at her home", one that did explicitly convey death by homicide, it should have made little difference. For all Denise Brown and the rest of her family knew, Nicole had been "killed at her home" by an intruder, perhaps one the police had already caught. Pending further clarification by Detective Lange, these were all very real possibilities, yet Nicole's family required no further information: Every adult member of the Brown household responded to his prefatory statement in exactly the same way - "O.J. did it!" while not a single one asked for any detail,
not even how she died.

Denise Brown, who apparently "knew that motherfucker would kill her" at 6:21 a.m. on June 13th, 1994 had no idea that a tourist visiting Los Angeles had, upon recognizing "The Juice", videotaped her hugging and kissing O.J. Simpson on each cheek after Sydney Simpson's dance recital less than 12 hours earlier, at about 7:00 p.m. on June 12th, 1994. What woman would kiss and hug a man that she believes, nay, knows is going to murder her sister?

>>222146715
>kill your own daughter just because ex SIL owns your house, instead of just killing him
this makes no sense
shitty reddit tier true crime retard bait theory

>>222148013
But how does that stop them from getting evicted?

the cia thought they could spark a race war if they blasted everyone with this shit 24/7 on all the news channels. in retrospect, all it did was make people bloodthirsty and sexist.

>>222148174
They would have custody over the children.

>>222148068
Killing OJ would make no sense. Your logic failed.

>>222148441
So what? That's not going to stop oj from selling the house.

>>222148521
It wouldn't be his to sell after the civil judgment. He wouldn't have been able to skirt around it if he was actually convicted in criminal Court

>>222148541
You're just making shit up. It would be his to sell after any civil judgement. It would be his to sell the day he got arrested. Getting convicted wouldn't have affected his ownership of the house.

>>222148604
He wasn't about to evict the family of the person he was accused of murdering. Oj's fear the public backlash is the reason the browns ended up living there in perpetuity anyway

In the second half of Nicole and O.J.'s doomed one-year trial reconciliation, Nicole had put her San Francisco condominium up for sale in order to buy herself a home with the proceeds: her South Bundy Drive townhouse in Brentwood. Though not a problem for Nicole herself, the loss of this revenue stream would be felt by her parents and sisters, who remained as dependent upon her charity as they had when she was still married to O.J. Simpson. Since 1985, the monthly income generated by the San Francisco rental property had provided Nicole with more than enough surplus funds with which to help keep her family afloat. Once sold, however, she would no longer have that extra cash to dole out to her parents and siblings.

Perhaps the wasted year of giving up her freedom to date a man purely for her parents' sake had been the last straw for Nicole. Perhaps she was thinking practically about herself and her own future, having come to the realization that, as a woman divorced from a millionaire and not a millionaire herself, she could not support her parents and three adult sisters forever.
A nightmare scenario in which O.J. Simpson took their house at the same time Nicole Brown Simpson cut them off was exactly the sort of grim near-future the Browns were desperate to avoid. Unless something drastic happened to prevent it, the fallout of O.J. and Nicole's final break-up on Mother's Day 1994 would be apocalyptic for the Browns. That day would mark the beginning of the end for the family, the demarcation line at which they could expect their 15-year free ride care of the Simpsons - O.J. and Nicole - to be well and truly over. It cannot be coincidence, therefore, that just one month after this crucial date, Nicole Brown Simpson would be found dead, with O.J. Simpson charged for the crime shortly after.

>>222148441
>Killing OJ would make no sense. Your logic failed.
It'd make more sense than killing their own daughter just to avoid having to move

>>222148912
That's nonsense. In your scenario, Jason and arnelle get everything and the browns get nothing.

In my scenario, the browns get Nicole's estate, custody of the kids which would give them everything if OJ got the death penalty.