>If you don't like something, don't watch it>Despite the fact that we made our entire channel off of ripping into things we hateWhat did Mike mean by this?
>>222304681Mike Stoklasa is a hypocrite who says no one should criticize Disney Star Wars because of starving kids in Africa when he made his career on criticizing George Lucas Star Wars.
>>222304681>>Despite the fact that we made our entire channel off of ripping into things we hateWell no, lil zoomie. You see, RLM built their success on things they love - namely Star Trek and Star Wars, and how the latter-day media coming out of both franchises was terrible, whereas the early stuff had been great.Also, back then it wasn't a "channel" - they used to host their content on their own website, only migrating to a YouTube channel later.I know you wanted this thread to be a gotcha, but you fell on your face instead. I hope you learn from this. Or you could get angry and call me a tranny. Whatever works for you.
>>222304879George Lucas star wars killed every job in hollywood that weren't green screen installation
>>222305004SPBP
>>222305004>and how the latter-day media coming out of both franchises was terrible, whereas the early stuff had been great.Right, so they're still ripping into things that they hate. This entire diatribe you went on proved effectively nothing and only reinforced my point. I don't understand how you think that this is a refutation of the point at all. They're still objectively watching things they hate and reviewing them.
>>222304681>If you don't like something, don't watch itI really hate this criticism because you have to pay to watch the movie to find out if you like it in the first place. You can't just retroactively decide not to watch it, so no one should try to shame you for complaining about it being someone you don't like after you paid money to learn that.
>>222305170You completely failed to understand his point and tried to save face by instead asserting that it somehow reinforced "your point" (it didn't by the way)Get over yourself
>>222305004>You see, RLM built their success on things they loveNo, they were created to hategrift on Star Wars and defend Disney Wars.
>>222305243>Despite the fact that we made our entire channel off of ripping into things we hate>You see, RLM built their success on things they love - namely Star Trek and Star Wars, and how the latter-day media coming out of both franchises was terrible, whereas the early stuff had been great.So, they made their channel on ripping into things that they hate, which was the new content for Star Trek and Star Wars. For them to claim "don't like, don't watch" is hypocrisy because they've made their careers off of it. Can you explain how I'm wrong?
>>222305004I forgot - tranny.
>>222304681You could've just posted this in the active Red Letter Media thread here >>222268311rather than starting another one. Kind of pointless.
>>222305290>North american culture
>>222305334OP saw that one had lots of replies and wanted that for himself
>>222305243RLMfags argue in this really smug, blithe and dishonest way. It's honestly really infuriating. I don't think I've ever seen another fan base that argues like this.
>the plinkett reviews said the prequels were bad almost two decades ago>that means everything they've put out on their channel since then is hate grifting!imagine being this mentally ill and obsessed with youtubers who just like to get drunk and talk about movies.
>>222306081Should they have not watched the prequels and made videos about them then if they disliked them?
bump
