[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_3246.jpg (805 KB, 2880x2160)
805 KB JPG
>Supergirl” officially concludes its theatrical run with just $124.6 million worldwide — the lowest for a DC film in 22 years.
Yeah this is not working, Gunn.
>>
>>222311240
Gunn is still working for Disney. He's sabotaging DC intentionally and they are paying him millions of dollars under the table to do so.
>>
it’s insane that even this piece of shit still makes over 100 million dollars
like how can you make a product that makes 100 million dollars and still loses money , how does a bunch of people running around pretending to be things cost so much money
>>
>>222311369
Lies and slander. You will hear from us.
>>
xochitl should have been supergirl
>>
>>222311626
She couldn't even make the red carpet. She's finished.
>>
>>222311240
It was probably a mistake to watch Supergirl right after seeing Brand New Day because it made Supergirl seem even more like direct to streaming slop in comparison. An ugly movie that looks like it was filmed entirely on one generic "space bar" set or in front of a green screen. Surf Dracula story of her only getting her costume in the last fight of the movie (which was set to that awful cover) - also gotta save Krypto again!. Misses the point and aesthetic of the comic its adapting and is just overall a dull fucking time.
>>
>>222311389
simply by using too much money making the thing. For the longest time, making 100 million was very good for most movies made, when their production budgest were counted in tens of millions or even millions.

But, the shift happened in the 90s, when they started increasing the budgets. I remember how there was some genuine questions about how the Titanic was so expensive to make, when it ballooned to 200 million budget. It was a news item. People were mocking Waterworld when it ended costing 175 million. Now, those budgets are more or less a norm for big budget movies, yet we constantly see them doing less than what they need to break even.

It's no wonder Hollywood is desperately trying to find the next Youtube thing they can produce cheap and make a killing.
>>
File: 11527.gif (1.12 MB, 450x261)
1.12 MB GIF
>>222311240
>this retarded girlboss slop bombing will also kill any hope for a Lobo film
>>
I feel bad for the Sneeder Supergirl because that was her first big break and I haven't seen her in anything since.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.