ANNE HATHAWAY WILL PLAY A TRADWIFE INFLUENCER WHO WAKES UP LIVING THE 1855 SHE'S BEEN ROMANTICIZINGThe premise alone is why this book blew up this summer. A conservative influencer builds her whole career and following around an old -fashioned homemaker lifestyle, then one day wakes up actually living in 1855, and the fantasy stops feeling so charming fast.It's based on the debut novel "Yesteryear" by Caro Claire Burke, which became a beach- read phenomenon after publishing in English this spring. Hathaway read an early draft, bought the film rights, and will both produce and star in the adaptation.The tradwife trend has exploded online over the past few years, with creators building massive followings around a return to "traditional" domestic roles. Researchers who study the genre say the appeal comes from the built-in contradiction, influencers criticizing modern womanhood while running successful personal brands to do it.This isn't even the only "tradwife" book out this year. At least three novels with that word in the title have published in 2026 alone, all digging into the gap between the aesthetic and the reality.Would you want to actually live the "good old days," or is the fantasy better than the real thing?
>>222317307so a propaganda movie?
>>222317307>effortposting at 7 o'clock in the morning
can she move her eyebrows in 1855?
>Western isekaichrist
>>222317307Holy sedo
>>222317307I want to wake up 1855 and tell Karl Marx that we are still in muh late stage capitalism after 200 years and working class is chilling with their grills and his retarded ideology is taught in $150000 college courses.
>>222317354why are agp troons obsessed with looking like women from the 1950s or earlier
>>222317307>psychological horror>new american extremism
>>222317354That is a man
>>222317392>>222317354He doesn't look like that
>>222317307Can we stop with these feminist propaganda movies? Who gives a shit if a woman wants to have a more traditional relationship and live a more traditional lifestyle. Mind your own fucking business. These attacks only ever go one way. You never see Hollywood media attacks on an exaggerated feminist archetype who pursued her career and casual sex for her entire fertile life, and now wakes up at 45 miserable because she doesn't have a family and doesn't get anything close to the level of attention from men that she used to get.
>>222317307I hate this uncanny kike like you wouldn't imagine.This doesn't look like a real person
>>222317418what the fuck
>>222317307Sorry, dont watch dumb foid flicks
>>222317421>Who gives a shit if a woman wants to have a more traditional relationship and live a more traditional lifestylelots of women do that and get no shit for itbecause they do it in private
>>222317392This is a woman and if you disagree she'll punch you so hard she'll shatter 15 bones in your face.
>>222317450But they do get shit for it. This movie is an example of feminists shitting all over an exaggerated archetype of the lifestyle they chose to pursue. They are explicitly demonizing it. Again, this explicit demonization of caricatures only ever goes one way in Hollywood media.
>>222317325It's promoted by good morning america and the usual suspects.>"Yesteryear" by Caro Claire Burke,The ending reveals the time travel is her going nutso, and she goes to jail for child neglect.It's almost handmaiden's tale class.>>222317421>>222317484You already know the answer to that. Can you imagine hollywood telling the followup tale to Sex in the City?
I bought this book for my gf because she reads a bunch of books, some junk, and I want her to tell me about it but I never want to read it myself. Based or cringe?
>>2223175083d pig disgusting. Do not speak of her here again.
>women are even remotely liking the idea of traditionalism? quick, create a book about how it is bad, shill it everywhere a woman's vision may reach and then make a movie about it
>>222317307About time we started getting some isekai kino
>>222317307FINALLY. Cannibalistic pedophiles and whores from Hollywood will show suburban and rural retards what is a proper lifestyle and how to become a Good Person.
>>222317307On some level, every woman is aware that most women would trade away their autonomy and independence to be a kept woman with no job or responsibility. If a critical mass of these women come to exist, then it threatens their influence as a concensus driven voting bloc.
>>222317484>But they do get shit for it.Proof? even a believable personal anecdote will do
>>222317535And not just show how bad it is, set it several hundred years ago.That's like someone getting happiness from religion, and then some (((producers))) creating move where that person is transported to the 1400's during the Spanish inquisition.Why do leftists feel a need to create educational films disguised as commercial dramas? Why can't they just discuss politics like normal people and leave films as entertainment?
>>222317307>in an alternate reality, a right wing constitutionalist wakes up in 1855 and has to face the reality of free speech and gun laws. While in modern day, he made his living as an influencer talking about gun rights and the dangers of Islam, in 1855, he thrives and ends up becoming president. His name? Rutherford B. Hayes.
>>222317587The movie this thread is about gives them shit for it. Pay attention. Unless you think someone demonizing your lifestyle doesn't count as someone giving you shit, but I believe that's a minority view of language.
>>222317307>oh you want to live out the 1950s lifestyle? Too bad, we're sending you back to 1855 with no electrical appliances and a life expectancy of 40 so you will see how stupid you are. Checkmate, right wingers!Lots of intellectual honesty as always.
>>222317421You have an entire Hallmark genre dedicated to “single career woman suddenly realises she needs a man and falls in love with a local hunk at her hometown she’s visiting” you disingenuous fuck.
>>222317307But, are not these tradwife type women thinking about the 1950s, or even at this point some even the 1990s or whatever. Where are these tradwives arguing for not having widespread vacuums, and fridges, and all the rest. It is not as if you want to ideologically attack them you cannot do so in the 1950s or 1960s.
For the longest time I always thought that tradwives were just a fetish thing.
>>222317307If women returned to being homemakers then all these useless jobs they fill wouldn't be paying taxes. It's no wonder the Jews in charge are pushing back so hard against this.
>>222317690That's not demonizing a caricature of a feminist woman. It's a wish fulfillment romantic fantasy for a feminist woman. It's completely different.
>>222317723leftists don't understand nuance, I don't know why you're bothering with him
>>222317307>1855they missed the mark by a century. It’s the 1950’s that looked peak, not the 1850’s. 1855 is right before the civil war, what retard would want that shit??
>>222317753Because the point is to demonize. So they have to exaggerate it as much as they can while still keeping some believable resemblance to the targeted phenomenon.
>>222317307They'll actually make this tweet a movie? Holy kek
>>222317421>Who gives a shit if a woman wants to have a more traditional relationship and live a more traditional lifestyle. People don’t care when it’s truly your choice. What people take issue with is tradwife influencers promoting that shit as universal solution to all your problems. Especially when a lot of it is actually pretty fake. Like how can you be a real tradwife when you as a tradwife influencer spend so much time creating content online and promoting shit and make that your career. It often is also pretty toxic and misogynistic from the male support side, which is why you now see plenty of former tradwife influencers talk about how the lifestyle made them miserable and how they basically suffered from domestic abuse etc. but they couldn’t be open about that because it would’ve hurt their brand, etc.
>>222317626If anything it gives them shit for branding and monetizing their lifestyle. Pay attention :^).nobody cares about women who do these things privately, unless you want to take random individuals to task for disapproving of a friend or relative's lifestyle
>>222317307Hollywood liberals sniffing their own farts again? How novel.
If they made a movie like this but for men everyo would lose their minds and get outraged. like a movie where a man achieves "the dream* and has a wife, kids, successful career, is a provider and does everything society says men should do and all that jazz but he is axtu miserable. Women would riot
>>222317723The prevalent messaging in those movies is always how you are not actually happy working at the city and have to return to your bumfuck hicktown and find happiness because your soulmate is actually some bearded jacked up dude who works with its hands. It couldn’t more on the nose. You just don’t think it’s enough because you want to call middle age women dumb whores who are forever miserable because they didn’t have kids and literally nobody is interested in preachy, toxic cringe shit like
>>222317839lol based gook
>>222317839>Kangmin Leelol these squeaky little azn fuccbois trying to look hard
>>222317870Wtf are you talking about there’s countless movies where men are miserable despite having kids, wife, house and dog.
Don’t worry this will flop and Elon will make the based version made with AI
>>222317887name some for me then and not movies where he has all that but is found to be cheating on his wife or something as a result of his miserable-ness
>>222317307Progressives like to pretend there is no distinction between scientific progress and cultural/spiritual progress. >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5ydZO7yFUQHathaway aborted her children for a golden idol. What does it profit a man tp gain the whole world and lose his soul?
>Being a tradwife in the current year of convenience is JUST THE SAME as living in 1855
>>222317307If tradwives wanted to live in the 1800s they would just go to the Amish. But they don't.
>>222317923Because it's not about being "traditional" it's ultimately about not having to go to work
>>222317843>What people take issue with is tradwife influencers promoting that shit as universal solution to all your problems.But this is false. The issue isn't with influencers promoting a glamorized version of a lifestyle. Otherwise you would get the same demonization of other lifestyles in Hollywood media. No, the object of this influence promotion is what feminist detractors take an issue with. Just say that you hate it when women want to live more traditional lifestyles and you want to dissuade them from pursuing them. No need to obfuscate. You yourself in your reply to me go into detail about how this lifestyle is so uniquely harmful, so why even pretend that just the mere act of lifestyle glamorization in the abstract is the issue here? It's clearly not.
>>222317872>The prevalent messaging in those movies is always how you are not actually happy working at the city and have to return to your bumfuck hicktown and find happiness because your soulmate is actually some bearded jacked up dude who works with its hands.Yes, liberal women in the city are famously happy people. And your comparison is totally not a false equivalence.
>>222317936Even women who are employed don't work though, almost all of them are in adult daycare
>>222317923can you just "join" the amish as easily is that? i thought you had to be born amish.
>>222317856>If anything it gives them shit for branding and monetizing their lifestyle.But that's clearly false. There's plenty of feminist boss babe influencers who brand and monetize their lifestyle. There's a shit ton of female influencers who brand and monetize all kinds of lifestyles. But feminists only ever attack a specific kind of influence and promotion to women. The more traditional kind. This demonization is not independent of the advertised lifestyle. In fact it's entirely because they believe this kind of lifestyle is uniquely harmful.
>>222317973no, you can't
>>222317917the whole point is that it's not the same, which is why the whole 'tradwife' movement is a delusional grift
>>222318016they're shitting on all tradwives, libtard
>>222317973It seems possible but I'm not an experthttps://amishamerica.com/becoming-amish/
>>222317872That's not the message of those movies at all. In fact it's hard to even talk about a message with such movies. It's like saying porn has a message. No, it's purely an escapist fantasy. It doesn't matter where the woman escapes to. It matters that she goes somewhere that's not the environment she's currently in. There's nothing in those movies telling the audience that the way they chose to live their life is a mistake. No, in fact the woman being wholly independent and free to pursue whatever is why the plot can even get going in the first place. It's not a rejection of how she got to the place she's currently in. It's a fantasy of doing something else with where she currently is. There's no irreversible mistakes. There's no horror of realization and the weight of consequences crashing down on you. No, it's "the world is your oyster and you can do/get whatever, if you so choose". It's completely different. The vibe of those movies isn't to make you reflect in an uncomfortable and confrontational way. It's to make you enamored and/or horny.
>>222317440/thread
>>222317937nobody hates women more than other women. Doubly so for liberal career women if they're doing it then by God, you're gonna do it too, bitch.
>>222317421Anon, the point is to make women think being a tradwife is bad and being an INDEPENDENT WOMAN is good. It's propaganda. Another reminder that McCartney didn't go far enough
I'm a woman and I think
>>222318276bobs. now
>>222318276That's so hot
>>222318276No you don't, liar.
>>222317307Oh boy, the incels aren’t going to like this.
>>222318267you're wasting your time. This guy is doing the liberal discourse meme.
I mean, no shit? Wouldn't anyone hate going back in time to 1855? You'd die of dysentry or a paper cut or something
>>222318377This, leftists and their corporations are once again speaking truth to power.
>woman gets exactly what she wants >still loses meme sex
>>222317307>be in 1855>get a papercut>die>drink water without alcohol in it>get the shits or die>catch a cold>die>get too hot>die>get constantly fucked with by injuns who realized that they didn't rip off the palefaces by trading land (which they didn't think you could own) for rifles, horses, and other shit, then deciding they were ripped-off, so now they're being a bunch of Indian-givers. >die
>>222318416yeah right. i beat oregon trail like 50 times
>>222317872Liberalism is just pretending not to understand dot png
>>222317307This is a sadistic revenge fantasy for miserable 40 year old career womenIt will do a billion dollars
>>222317901Click, American Beauty, Revolutionary Road, All or Nothing…
Funny how the stay at home was killed by rightoid trickle down economics but miggers always blame leftists
>>222317937>But this is falseIt’s true. The image they create is all about how you are more happy staying at home, baking and so on because it’s “natural for women”.
>>222318416Yes my fellow excelsior, the human race also died out from drinking unpasteurised milk, eating unchlorinated meat and standing in the sun without a protective layer of petroleum, this has happened many times over because 9 months is a long time to start replacing your losses when you can die from a simple splinter or racial slur thrown your way, praise science
>>222317421Nothing wrong with trad wife in principal, but influencers gloss that shit up, and 99% of them will fold like cowards when faced with a genuinely traditional female lifestyle. Trad life is not for the weak, hence why most of them back in the day were drugged up and boozed up to make it through the day.
>>222318524Did you ever read what I wrote? What you wrote here is completely non-responsive to my point. In fact it reinforces it further, which you'd know if you read it. Try again.
>>222318435Jimmies: rustled
>>222318267Yes true freedom giving up all agency and just expecting the man to make all the decisions and make all the money.It’s fucking hilarious how this place constantly cries about how modern women make impossible monetary demands of men and won’t date anyone who come short of them, only to turn and furiously insist women should only be tradwifes who expect to stay home while men work and singlehandedly take care of the providing the money
Would any men like going back to 1855 either?>Chance of death is higher>Life is harder>Banditry is rife>Living conditions for most of the population are worse>Women's and minority rights are highly restricted>Average hygiene is poor>Everything smells of shit and/or smoke
>>222318416>Wouldn't anyone hate going back in time to 1855?As a duchess in England no problem.As a peasant's wife in Moldova no.
>>222318641Depends on where you end up.The medicine is terrible overall, that much is true.
>>222318513The cost of living crisis is an inflation problem. What policies cause inflation do ya think?
>>222318267>McCartney didn't go far enoughWhy? Ram and McCartney II were absolutely kino and he's done other good albums as well
>>222318641>everyone just knee jerks to demonizing or idealizing the eraI swear.
>>222317856You must be really popular at temple, moshe.
>>222317872have you ever actually watched one of those movies?
>>222318276X
>>222318552>Nothing wrong with trad wife in principalFeminists obviously find the trad lifestyle wrong. This excuse that what they have a problem with is lifestyle glamorization in the abstract is false, as evidenced by them not criticizing other lifestyles via the media they produce. There's plenty of boss babe influencers who glamorize their lifestyle and abstract out all the pitfalls, issues, and problems that it has. There's plenty of influencers of all kinds. Hollywood has no heat for them. No, they demonize the trad influencers because they believe their specific influence is uniquely harmful to women. It's obvious to anybody who has eyes, which is why this excuse won't fly anywhere else outside of feminist echo chambers, where the members gaslight each other to prevent themselves from feeling like their crusade isn't as righteous as they want it to feel.
>>222318276show vagine we can all make sure.
>>222317307They should do one where they teleport a suffragette to a tranny protest in the current year
>>222317856But when you make Sex and the City to glorify being a whore, or run an onlyfans, that's okay, right Rabbi?
>>222317694They're setting it that far back because the intent is to demonize romanticism of the past by lying about what tradwives want. If they set it in the '50s, how substantially worse would it be? Women were financially reliant on their husbands, but at the same time you could raise a family on a single income. Instead of the internet, you'd read books. According to Hollywood, domestic violence, substance abuse and (anti-black) racism are extremely common these days, so no change there.
>>222317502>You already know the answer to that. Can you imagine hollywood telling the followup tale to Sex in the City?The author told it herself. She said shes sad and alone now.
>>222317856Comments like this actually show how funny it is that tradwife influencers specifically make Jews lose their minds, they come up with this total bullshit to excuse their seething hatred
>>222318811So wheres her movie about that?
Women of /tv/, what's your opinion on this film?
>>222317654Kek.
>>222317307How far into the movie do you think she’s going to be raped by some chad?
>>222318123>be Amish>have a websiteLol
>>222317307Nostalgiafags in the mud.
>>222317307>More cultural war bullshit to further divide the country**YAWN**
>>222317307>They're coming for the trad wives now, all 5 of them that actually existThese pieces of shit are relentless, there's not a single "trend" developing in society that they won't quickly make a film about to lie and subvert.
>>222317973You'd have to learn their language adapt to their beliefs, and even then they'd basically have to adopt you and you literally don't know how to do any of their work.It's not like they have a rule about it (at least not most of them) but they're practical people and you, practically, are a liability.
>>222317307>you say you want to keep the good parts of the past and the good parts of the present? >THAT MEANS YOU WANT THE BAD PARTS OF THE PAST AND THE BAD PARTS OF THE PRESENT
>>222317307Women's literacy was a mistake.
>>222319106> don't know how to do any of their work.Some of the tradfags should have learned it by now.
>>222317307HOLY BASEDas if odyssey wasn't enough, another total chud humiliation lmao
>>222317535>>222317307you know what would be a good idea for a movie? Have a feminist wake up being treated like a man.
>>222318796And men could rape and beat their wives and that was okay because it’s private business and police couldn’t do anything unless they literally saw it happen and then thought it was extreme enough to need intervention. Alcoholism was common place. Everyone patronised you and thought you were unqualified for things simply because you didn’t have a dick.
>>222317421>>222317502
>>222317421The replies prove this thread has been planned and shilledExpect more
>>222317578High iq
>>222317856You need to go back to gaslighting school and get your parents money back
>>222317307Satan is already at work I see
>>222318758>as evidenced by them not criticizing other lifestyles They do, you’re just too up your own ass. The reason most feminist media tends to revolve around certain topics is because to this day conservatives still try to take women’s rights away and deny them the same freedoms men take for granted. You see it with politicians trying to remove their right to an abortion. How some think you should be given a death sentence if you abort and every miscarriage needs a police murder investigation to make sure there was no foul play. How they push women to have no say in politics because men should make all the decisions and women can’t possibly have autonomy. They tell women they shouldn’t go to school because your one job is to get married young and then just pop babies like you were on a factory line. It’s constant attempt at controlling women and limiting what they should do with their lives instead of offering them freedom of choice
>>222317307From the twiated mind of Jordan Peterson?
>>222319260Again, Hollywood still says those things are extremely commonplace today. We've gotten over a decade of girlboss movies meant to show how women run the world.
>>222319392No they don’t. You’re making shit up and crying that women can be bosses too, like a pathetic loser who obviously can’t deal with losing to a girl
>>222318586no you’re really just cringe seeking low hanging fruit gotchas out of cope
>>222317307>1855Let me guess it's gonna be a retarded strawman story where shes transported to some rich druggie victorian guy's manor despite the fact most of these influencers usually point to a more rural middle age-y type of lifestyle
>>222317325Fpbp
>>222318673they are so gleeful to announce they aren’t a “bad” npc
>>222319260imagine seeing feminists lie about everything today, but then still believe them about what life was like 70 years ago.>>222319246would be a good tragedy drama to see a feminist wish to be treated like a man and then become a bitter incel who gets her ass kicked and loses a DEI promotion. For the anon above, maybe she gets assaulted by a woman but then ends up in jail for defending herself.Then kills herself.
>>222318831They need hollywood to promise them happiness because men also make them think about accountability which is badWomen have chosen fiction over truth
>>222319149Lmfao>>222319198The odyssey being woke was just outrage marketing and you fell for it
>>222317307damn they are making this shiksa PAY for her careergod damn
>>222319382Ok this is actual bait
>>222319453Imagine showing a victorian child a calmjak, I bet he would laugh
>>222319425girls aren’t winning anythingThey just go along with men being treated as lesser by the stateYou’re a loser who needs men to keep her weak with movies like this
>>222319382>They doCould I see some examples of Hollywood media explicitly demonizing e.g. the boss babe lifestyle? With an explanation of how they're doing it? Shouldn't be that hard if the reason feminists shit on female trad influencers is only because of lifestyle glamorization independent of what it is that's glamorized, right?>The reason most feminist media tends to revolve around certain topics is because to this day conservatives still try to take women’s rights away and deny them the same freedoms men take for granted.Outside of abortion, which is a highly morally complex and contentious issue, that even the majority of women have an issue with in many circumstances, what are the rights that conservatives want to take away from women? Where is it e.g. in the Republican party policy to take away women's right to vote, or to make it legal to have them sold into slavery? This is just nonsense terminally-online perpetual victim narrative that feminism needs to uphold to stay afloat in 2026, because if you actually go outside it crumbles instantly.>How they push women to have no say in politics because men should make all the decisions and women can’t possibly have autonomy.>They tell women they shouldn’t go to school because your one job is to get married young and then just pop babies like you were on a factory line.This is again terminally online belief that has no place in mainstream politics. Quit desperately trying to manufacture fake reality to feel like you're oppressed. It's pathetic.>It’s constant attempt at controlling women and limiting what they should do with their lives instead of offering them freedom of choiceOh, like feminists do with institutions they captured like Hollywood? You just don't recognize them demonizing certain lifestyles as trying to stifle what women should be free to choose to pursue, because you agree that they shouldn't be pursuing certain things.
>>222317307I hope this film is filled with spoucal rape and the creeping realization by Anne's character that she is into this kinky shit.
>>222319561You’re talking to the person who NEEDS movies like this to exist so that she can be told what to do and what to hateShe doesn’t have any actual counterpoints she’s just going to assert things on behalf of the nanny state that coddles her and then insult you once defeated
>I'm a forward young man
>>222319601
>>222319601Fuckin hell she got became a hag so quickly
>>222319580>she
>>222319491Hey cocksucker, back then they literally told women they shouldn’t exercise because women bodies couldn’t handle it after childhood. You could damage your uterus if you ran too much
>>222319762omg wow you're right this definitely means women were so heckin oppressed and were always being beaten and raped and stuff! And men's lives were super easy back then
>>222318267I agree; he should have made them do another take of "maxwell's silver hammer"
>>222319762they used to prescribe men cigarettes to treat digestion and throat issues.
>>222319561>Could I see some examples of Hollywood media explicitly demonizing e.g. the boss babe lifestyle?Disclosure. Nothing in Common. Devil wears Prada. There’s numerous movies where the female character in the movie is either a villain, a total bitch boss, someone who doesn’t care about anything except climbing the corporate ladder and will dumb the male protagonist like nothing when he doesn’t share that mindset, you name it. They’re currently openly talking about the need to dismantle women’s sports because that’s not what women should be doing. Because conservatives despise women sports. That’s what all the trans bans was all about. >Where is it e.g. in the Republican party policy to take away women's right to voteIt doesn’t have to be written down when the right’s religious leaders are openly advocating for that and people like Pete Hegseth even invites his own preacher who believes in taking the vote away from women to Pentagon’s own prayer meetings instead of distancing himself from such views. You’re a disingenuous asshole who actively pretends the right religious spaces that hold a lot of sway in republican politics don’t advocate these things. Probably because you like those things
>>222319908And male doctors even today frequently dismiss women telling them they are in pain because silly bitch, you can’t be in pain because I’m a man and I know better
>>222320033>I’m a man and I know betteruh, maybe they're a DOCTOR and know better?
>>222317307>which became a beach- read phenomenonFoid-conjured bullshit to corral other simpleton foids. No goybeamed foid will want to miss out on this BEEEACH READING PHENOMENON NOVEL TAKING THE BEACHES BY STORM!! I'm so sick of foid nuttery.
>>222320109Except they don’t. There’s numerous studies that show that men consistently think women exaggerate their symptoms and feelings of pain and then give treatment based on what they falsely believe is a lower true level of pain. Same bias applies to treating black people, especially black males, where it’s widely thought by doctors that they don’t experience pain same way as white people.
>>222320191There's some amount of truth to it. Women are neurotic as fuck and almost every hypochondriac I've known was female
>>222318867First night in 1855
>>222320033No it's because bitches be lyin' or they are extremely ignorant about their own biology. 9/10 they go running to a doctor complaining about pain it is just their period. Just wasting everyone's time and energy because they weren't paying attention in middle school health class.
>>222320191>There’s numerous studiesgood morning
>>222320015>There’s numerous movies where the female character in the movie is either a villain, a total bitch boss, someone who doesn’t care about anything except climbing the corporate ladderThat's not what I asked for. I didn't ask for movies with female villains. I asked for movies that demonize the boss babe lifestyle. I'll make it broader and say the archetypal feminist lifestyle. The "sex in the city" one. Hollywood productions hat show how the narrative about that lifestyle is based on lies, and if you too choose to pursue it, young innocent girl, you will be severely hurt. Movies with explicitly evil characters doesn't satisfy that purpose. I want movies that show the audience how perfectly normal women are mislead and lied to to pursue something that's bad.>They’re currently openly talking about the need to dismantle women’s sports because that’s not what women should be doing.The only faction talking about it is on left, because they want to let trans women compete in women's sports, which would completely destroy any chances of any biological women of ever competing in sports at the highest level and enjoying the benefits of those positions. But even that is an extremely fringe faction of the left that simply captured the media narrative, which blew the impression of their presence out of proportion. I don't see any analogously poisonous policy positions on the right. Show me examples of them. Go ahead.>It doesn’t have to be written down when the right’s religious leaders are openly advocating for thatOn some level you have to accept that you live in a pluralist society. There will be loonies on the right. There will be loonies on the left. Sometimes these loonies will be used as consultants. But what matters is that their loony beliefs don't make it into policy, because that policy is extremely unpopular. If we want to use your metric consistently, then I guess the left is racist, sexist, and even genocidal against white men, right?
>I GOT A MOVIE FOR YA, IT'S CALLED NO-WIFE
>>222317307Will she try the famous 19th century BBC?
>>222320191woman and joggers lie about and exaggerate everything, the white male doctors do know better
>>222317361this
can't wait for this movie to come out in two years and make zero dollars
>>222317307Leftist meme comics became so long and wordy they just straight up wrote a novel adaptation and now they're making a movie adaptation of a book adaptation of a leftist memeWhat's your favorite scene going to be? For me, it'll be how they punish the White sexist racist man who will be very mean to her without giving her a win since she's also the bad guy for promoting family values.Probably something like a mob of black guys beat him to death. And then she'll do something that goes against her family values like abandon a kid or choose her own life over saving one to show her being selfish.The final leftist argument against having strong morals or family values is >you don't actually feel like that, you're just being performitiveIt's probably because they don't actually have any principles and think no one else really does either
>>222320363Do you really still call us joggers? You realize that was like 10 years ago right unc?
>>222317307>>222317354>book published 4 months ago>movie rights were bought by anne hathaway 4 months ago>this is the author's first novelSmells inorganic as fuck.Also there's no such thing as a tradwife influencer, its an oxymoron.
Everything is about “The Message”. This shit is fucking sad.>My Body, My Choice!“I choose to be a stay-at-home wife/mom”>Noooooo! Not like that!Plus, the “tradwife” trend is much more 1955 than 1855. That’s the fucking Civil War. Leftists pretending not to understand things, again!
>women were oppressed in the pas-
>>222320527You're forgetting the part where they all had to have sex when they didn't feel like it sometimes. Only in the year 2000 did women gain the ability to say no.
>>222320441Keep on jogging in the free world
>>222317307>The tradwife trend has exploded online over the past few years, with creators building massive followings around a return to "traditional" domestic roles.Sounds like a job.
>>222317361>I see, very concerning, but more importantly, can you spare me some money?t. Marx probably
>>222317307The twist is exactly the same as the one from The Village. There you go I saved you some time
>>222317872But middle age women without children are in fact miserable.
>>222317361I'd really like to ask him his personal opinion on Stirner and watch him seethe for 2 hours.>>222317325fpbp
>>222318549So people should get skin cancer and tuberculosis from drinking milk because you're a miserable boomer who can't stop malding about Obama?
>>222319260>Whores and shrews gettifn beaten is acceptable. >Everyone is drunk and having fun. That sounds like paradise.
>>222319382Killing your unborn child is not a right.
>>222320252>periods can’t be painful Spoken like a stupid man
>>222321219That's not what was being said at all.
>you like traditions huh>well 100 years ago YOU WOULD HAVE NO A/C >checkmate, chud now you understand that tradition is meaningless
>>222320191So how does a practitioner of medicine treat pain with no physical source that exists only in your mind?
>>222317361>$150000 college courses.Tell him education up to university is free or virtually free in the first world. That might cheer him up a bit.
Women lie about pain to get xanax.
>>222317431she give off legit psychopath vibes, 100% bunny boiler
>>222321301>50% tax is "free"Socialist delusions lol
> oh no i have to make sure the house is clean and make one meal a day. also i have to be sure to not jump on every cock in a 15 mile radius>woe is me
>>222317421To be fair what you described is 95% of hallmark movies
>>222321343>libertarian retard doesnt understand spillover benefitsImagine my shock
>>222317307Tradwives don't idealize 1855, they idealize 1955. Are women retarded?
>>222319260>can't slap your wife around anymore>society disintegratescoincidence?
>>222321545taxation is theft and you're gay
>>222321576thisThe tradwife thing is about going back to before the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s, not to the fucking pre Civil War era
>>222321331Hathaway is a true believer in all the social justice identity politics garbage. I will never understand how so many here overlook that because they have a mommy fetish. She's exceptionally annoying.>>222321576>>222321651It's because the author wanted to shorehorn slavery into the story for more grievance points.
I find the idea hilarious. Going back to the 19th century and your concern is le tradwife? There's a shit ton of adjustment you need to make compared to your coddled life of modern comfort. But this is the focus?Why didn't she make it about going back to the 50s which is what the tradwife stuff is riffing on anyway? A little less jarring and she will still moan that there's no air con before moping about making dinner
>>222320975>Obama worship out of nowhere this is your brain on science
>one description of the endless laundry causing her fingers to “crack and bleed">the night she loses her virginity to her new husband, she says: “I felt like I needed to throw a dish towel over his penis and wait an hour to let it rise”this is what scares women more than anything in the world
>>222321749>Why didn't she make it about going back to the 50sThey have to go back even further in time because the 50s is too alluring now, as it preceded the forced-by-gunpoint diversity and immigration initiatives. They can't wring anymore lies and distortions out of that period, due to the overall raise in white racial consciousness, and a longing for those before-times.
>>222320286You're fucking retarded if you don't think those right-wing, religious nutjobs have sway in the government.
>>222321880If by religious you mean jewish, absolutely.
>>222321196Its not a child. The fetus isn't a lifeform unless late into the gestation period.
Will she be whipping Zendaya for being her husband's lustful fieldhand?
>>222321946Single-celled organisms are "lifeforms".
>>222317307You mean 1955 right? A 100 years is kind of a lot in women rights time. Also i doubt that´s the time conservative women idolize when they talk about going back, they probably mean something like 1985 or 1995. Whoever is making this is probably kind of biased.
>>222321282Believe. All. Women.Chud.
Sounds like a flick for forward young Men
>>222317307There is no lazier writing than "X wakes up in Y year".>>222317392Literally the meme
>>222317307Who will they cast for the white husband? How would you feel if it was Ellen Paige?
>>222317307Is this isekai?
>>222322026I've checked out some reviews online. Yo be honest it doesn't sound like a good book. Most women critics point out its lackluster and quite fairly point out the main character's battle with her own Christianity is basic and unresearched. Anne Hathaway supposedly bought rights while it was just a draft of a story so I expect the film to be a little different.The gist seems to be decent concept poorly executed, but frankly this is like if we had a film about a woman choosing a bear over a man come out back when that was a meme. Cringe reactionary stuff
>>222317535lel, this>Oh my science, did someone dare suggest that society was good in some respects before fags could get married and trillion-dollar tech conglomerates more powerful than most governments started tracking your every waking moment?! Ready the counter-propaganda!!!
>>222319601Shes going to shred the shit out of his application when she gets back to the office.
>>222320441Jogger, please
>hey, white women, specifically>raising a family is.. le bad!why is the propaganda so overt tho
>>222317450>you can do it as long as you do it in private and never talk about itHmm who’s oppressing women now chudlet
>>222321831>racist fall for 50s advertising LOLLMAO
Anne is HOT even now so I will watch.
>>222317327looks like a picture you could find on Google Images in 2 seconds and a copy-pasted block of textjust bc OP isn’t being purposefully retarded for (You)s doesn’t mean it’s high-effort
>>222317307>1855That's literally a century too early.Every tradwife is roleplaying as a 1950's US houswife.
>>222317307I have never heard a single "conservative influencer" that thinks we should go back to 1855. Regressives act like we are still in 1855, whether it comes to race or sex. A fresher, less contrived movie would be a spoiled modern liberal women ending up in 1855 and realizing how good she actually has it. Actually, just have her trade places with a Muslim woman in another part of the world in the present day.
>>222322842The whole “erm akshually the 50s were le bad” schtick has been beaten to death and it becomes less and less believable the more modern life goes to hell. They need to reach back to a time before we had many of the modern conveniences that make life comfortable, almost all of which existed in the 1950s.
>>222322762>YOU NEVER HAD CRIME FREE STREETS>YOU WERE NEVER ABLE TO PAY OFF A HOME ON A SINGLE INCOME>SINGLE MOMS WERE ALWAYS THE NORM>PAKISTANI RAPE GANGS WERE ALWAYS A THING>WE'D STILL HAVE LEADED GAS, ASBESTOS AND DDT AND WE'D HAVE NO IPHONES AND MARVEL MOVIES IF WE MAINTAINED TRAD VALUES
>>222321394And making that meal means more than just taking something put of the freezer. Everything in the kitchen is more rudimentary, you’ve got less spice choices, less ingredients to choose from, you’re not going to eat meat every day. You have to wash all the dishes by hand because you ain’t going to be rich enough to own a dishwasher. You don’t have an electric fridge, you’ve got an ice box and you need someone to regularly come in to bring you more fresh ice. You can’t afford to buy new clothes cheaply so you have to mend and sow your own shit most of the time. Vacuum cleaners are a novelty and shitty, so you’re mopping the floors all the time. Etc. etc. etc.
>>222322906>muh richard scarry world
So it turns out the book is a hit piece against a specific female influencer, hannah of Ballerina Farms, that the author used to obsess over on TikTok before deleting her account. The MC is dumb and despicable and gets humiliation ritual after humiliation ritual to the point its more a weird book about a parasocial obsession over a woman than anything to do with knocking down the tradwife infleuncer grift. Interesting
>>222317307sounds dumb
Anne Hathaway sure is in a lot of these types of movies with a message lately
>romanticizing>1855
>>222322943You could have said Thomas Kinkade.
>>222317307>dude if you actually did that you'd hate ot because.... uhhhh.... the past was just... EVIL ok?!?! trust me
>>222320452this
>>222322956Lmao. I bet the tradthot is also prettier than her
>>222320567oh no how horrible
>>222317307I thought tradwives LARP the 1950s, not 1850s
>>222322943high trust communities are real, anon
>>222323053She is forced to live real tradwife life and not the rich woman fantasy tradwife influencers sell, you moron
>>222319260>And men could rape and beat their wives and that was okayLet me guess - a leftard who defends foreign rape gangs everyday told you that.
>>222317325Yes
>>222323081So wtf is the point of it? It doesn't prove her wrong about the 1950's.
>>222323113I think the hate for tradwives is pure unfettered jealousy
>>222323081so the tradwife life before indoor plumbing and electric lights, not really a fair comparison
>>222319382>The reason most feminist media tends to revolve around certain topics is becausethey are socialist subversives who wants to destroy society. Simple as. Your gaslighting does nothing.
>>222323113If you go back to the 1950s you have no meat. The woman would get to wear 50s pin up fashion, the houses could be pretty nice, there is a lot of romanticisation of that time and the main bad thing you can represent is the husband coming home and beating her which frankly a lot of women fetishise anyway. The author knows this, that's why she went further back
>>222321731Still waiting on Hathaway's response to Iryna Zarutska.
What a weird twist ending, I bet they'll change it.>/tv/ preemptively offended by the movie
>>222317588Because they are pushing a subversive agenda that puts you under their thumb. >You WILL be a godless slave to the state>You WILL mindlessly consume our vitriolic propaganda>If you are white you WILL give up everything for easily manipulated, 3d world, shit eaters
>>222321946I agree that leftists are just clumps of cells.
>>222323106Marital rape wasn’t made illegal until 1970s. And it wasn’t nationwide until the 90s. And yeah, men beat their wives all the time back in the day and social norms made people not talk about it unless they saw it happen in real time. Cops couldn’t do shit about it because even today it’s tricky due to the victims being too scared to ask for help or report it. That’s why only fairly recently there’s stuff like the spouse being mandatorily arrested in domestic violence calls.
>>222323304>Marital rapeIllogical contradiction in terms that says more about the “society” that outlawed it than the practice itself
>>222323266Those would all apply to the 50s when there was the draft, propaganda was everywhere, including preaching against racism
>>222323304>Marital rape wasn’t made illegal until 1970s. And it wasn’t nationwide until the 90s. And yeah, men beat their wives all the time back in the dayThis, in islamic world.
>>222321946>Unless late into the gestation periodAt which point you arbitrarily consider the developing baby to be alive based on qualities that it possessed weeks before. You people are morally bankrupt clowns.
>>222323331So you think a wife should be allowed to tie you up when you sleep and molest your asshole with dildos and you would just accept it because that’s how marriage works, you get raped and like it
>>222323365What you described is wrong because it’s sodomy, not because it’s “rape.”
>>222323304Okay so the issue is, women find domestic abuse hot and that's what half of smut books entail
>>222323355Why don’t you prosecute every single woman for murder when they miscarry?
>>222323384Fantasies are fantasies. I kinda doubt you approve of your daughter being raped just because men have rape fantasies
>>222323383You committed sodomy on yourself, sissyboy. Women couldn’t do something like that
>>222318641The issue isn't whether or not the past would have better living conditions than the present; it is the idea that an ideological way of life is what is making the past 'bad'.>A bunch of modern day 'pagans' get to live in the 1200s in a nature cult in some random European village unknown to Christianity. >Some 'no kings' activists, frustrated with the tyrannical reign of Ronald Grump (a president that instated himself as king after creating work camps for all liberals and immigrants) are surprised when they wake up one morning and find they have been transported to France during the French Revolution>An oppressed but brilliant African scholar gets to live in Ancient Egypt.>A /tv/ poster upsets a fortune teller and wakes up wearing a mask with a black bag over it while being driven to an unknown location in a jeep.
>>222317307>tradwife influencerAnne Hathaway is WAY too fucking old for this role. It should have been Sydney Sweeney.
>>222317307>>222317325She's a jewess by the way. The jews are starting in with the "WHITE MAN BAD!" propaganda again.
>>222323365No, I am not a leftist, so my wife will not tie me and shove dildos up my ass and I won't rape her, because we love each other. I know this is foreign concept for you, because you don't have friends, you have allies, you don't have loved ones, you have state, and you don't have children, you have clumps of cells.
>>222323402Idk what your last part is about, my point is the author didn't set it in the 50s because it wasn't enough culture-shock value, the era reomanticisation is too powerful and domestic abuse wasn't gonna cut it so you have to take the bathroom away
>>222323420What?
>>222323389Do you really not know what a miscarriage is or are you pretending to be retarded? A miscarriage isn't a choice, going to a clinic to have your developing baby ripped out of your womb is a choice. How do you people not know how your own reproductive systems work?
>>222323148The writer knows that. Because on some level she agrees and seethes that there is no way in hell she will ever live that 1950's tradwife lifestyle or find a man willing to give it to her and put her in her place.
>propagandaYall niggas can't even read a summary. It's just a dumb scifi thriller where the woman is the bad guy.
>>222317307So we will get a scene of Anne shitting in a chamberpot, right?
>>222317876post forearms, brandon
>>222323304funny, thats exactly when western civilization stalled out
>>222323389Because in civilized non-brown countries, a person is found guilty of a crime if they have both the actus rea (criminal act) and mens rea (intent to commit the criminal act). A miscarriage is not a murder in the same way that having a seizure behind the wheel of a car and hitting someone isn't murder.
>>222323501it's grifter shit tho so propaganda fits
>>222323501>where the woman is the bad guy.the woman is the "bad guy" until je goes back to the past and encounters an even bigger "bad guy" where she is a slave, gets raped by a gang and killed!... oh wait that is just the modern UK
>>222323304>And yeah, men beat their wives all the time back in the day and social norms made people not talk about it unless they saw it happen in real time.Prove it, prove that there was an epidemic of spousal abuse.
The one thing women hate more than anything else is seeing other women genuinely happy
>>222323463>How do you people not know how your own reproductive systems work?We're seeng a dispute on what women are and have people unironically advocating to change the terminology to "chest feeders", like they're from AVP.The retardation is expected and predictable.
>>222323501>>222322956>>222323038Looks like a hit piece against some literal youtube channel anon.>prettier than herPosted without comment. Most recent group shot photo on my first page of results
>In this thriller's conclusion, it is revealed that the protagonist's "1855 pioneer life" is a delusion following a mental breakdown, as she is actually living on a retrofitted, isolated ranch. Her husband Caleb, who knew the truth, was living a double life while their children were raised in squalor, leading to a dramatic rescue by her older daughter. The story ends with Natalie serving a 30-year prison sentence for child endangerment, where she receives a memoir written by her youngest daughterthis is the book endingso there is no time travel
>>222323655Yeah but biological women are still taught how their reproductive systems work. I find it very hard to believe that young women are totally in the dark about the difference between miscarriages and abortions.
>>222317421Andrew Klavan at Daily Wire talked about how there should be movies like the one you described where the women chooses family over career. The problem is "alternative" media sources that have the resources to make those films make schlocky action movies instead that they do not have the budgets to pull off.
There is nothing wrong with tradition, but the Victorians were massive prudes who hated seeing wrist or ankle.Not only did the British have the worst food, they also had the worst sex. In fact they typically kept their clothes on.
bitch is 43 years old, she should be making how to cope with menopause videos
>>222323947>bitch is 43 years old, she should be making how to cope with menopause videosThis is the intended consequence of #MeToo - hags gatekeep female roles under the guise of protecting young actresses from 'exploitation' and so you get 40 years old fat Scarlett Johanssen in Jurassic World playing a mercenary, 43 years old Helen of Troy, 43 year old Hataway with dead face in fucking everything, and other assortment of 40 years old hags starring in action movies.
>>222318016>you can't be a stay at home mom because we have modern technologies so you're a grifterWhat?
>>222317307cant wait for the>A WHITE WOMANthreads start popping off with the trailerits gonna be pro leftists bullshitshell probably run into some nigger in 1855 get blacked and then want to stay there with him and be a tradwife for him, therefore undoing their propaganda because they just dont get it
>>222317307Robert pattinson stars as a 18th century larper / youtuber who is transported to 1778 to witness the birth of a nation, when it really was great again, coming this summer>ORANGE FOOL
>>222317307>The tradwife trend has exploded online over the past few years, with creators building massive followings around a return to "traditional" domestic rolesLol what I've never heard of this
BUT would you sex current Anne Hathaway
>>222324340>uses his knowledge to win the war earlier>gets a qt colonial gf>tells Jefferson to write the 2A where there are no debate about gun ownership>becomes a heroWould be kino
>>222317325yup you dont want a tradwife life you want to be a whore and not have kids female goy
>>222323304>and social norms made people not talk about it unless they saw it happen in real timeSeems pretty fair to me
>>222320777really?
welcome back to /tv/, the political arguments board
>>222317307I've got a better movie for youhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9kBohmnmWM
>>222317307wow the tradwife meme triggered hollyhomo THAT badly?
>>222321196>>222321977>>222323302>>222323355Will never EVER understand why chuds want more single moms.This abortion LARP, which I presume you do out of spite, is going to be the doom of us all. I don't care if its infanticide, fuck having more criminals.
>>222325306>which I presume you do out of spiteself-report
>>222319198what's this expression trying to convey?
>>222317307>*Dies of Dysentery*Imagine the smell.
>>222324779Yeah, it’s even better when we beat small boys
>>222323655>people unironically advocating to change the terminology to "chest feedersYeah but let me ask you. (Who) and how many? Cause you go Outside and ask a regular woman that and she'll be like wtf. This is part of the problem, you are putting a few deranged minority on a pedestal. I know we live in the social media age and everyone has a voice, but you don't have to listen to them
These feminist movies are non stop now.
>>222323839Not really no. As a matter of fact they are honestly retarded when it comes to the actual act of reproduction taking care of children and how birth control and abortions fuck up their bodies,
>>222324375The trad wife influencer the book is (not subtly) ripping on has 10m+ followers on Instagram. While it's clearly a grift and their real life is run by paid staff, a lot of women take the bait and obsess over hating it - i won't comment, I read redditors dumb opinions to rage when I'd be better off not consuming it so hey. However a consensus I've seen is the book goes too much into abusing its mc that it fails to discuss anything of weight with the premise. To me it sounds rather reactionary and the film will take liberties, it was bought by Hollywood while just a draft. I should read myself to really form an opinion but I don't know enough of what it's ripping on; a few women readers and critics have pointed it out though
>>222324279>shell probably run into some nigger in 1855 get blacked
>>222323463>A miscarriage isn't a choiceExcept it can be. You can’t be certain. Maybe you threw yourself down the stairs or otherwise purposely suffered blunt force trauma that caused a miscarriage. Maybe you took drugs. And it doesn’t really even matter whether or not conscious choice is involved because the state can still want to prosecute you for manslaughter because they just felt like it because the fundamentalists in charge are whacko like that. The second you start giving the fetus special rights and ban abortions you have to start treating all miscarriages are potential murder. That’s how the law works. You can’t just pick and choose whenever you feel like investigating a termination of pregnancy, every miscarriage has to be cleared, otherwise you’re willingly letting potential murderers walk.
>>222317307my mom read that book, said it was total dogshit
>>222325666The idea of a woman being authentically happy, even if it’s an illusion, is enough to send other women into a seething tailspin of hatred and envy.
>>222326061We already charge people for double homicide for killing pregnant women you fucking idiot.
>>222326160Yes and I think the author & other feminists with strong views on it ate missing the point. I don't think anyone who consumes trad wife content is unaware that this rich couple with 9 kids don't do all the work. I don't think they are unaware that actually, living in the past rearing cows would be "glamourous:". The product being sold is Stability. Its a stable life with meaning in a world that is chaotic, unpredictable and superficial. That's the 'feeling' it gives women who like that content but the author misses that point entirely, and can only put the main character in harmful situation after harmful situation & have her just be overall despicable and not a nice person herself, even when being abused.
>>222323890But why the fuck do they make shitty action movies?
>>222325539I work in academic in california. This is not theoretical for me. I am required to take annual training on the latest newspeak. However, followup on the topic needs to stay the fuck out of /tv/, so I'm dropping it here.>>222325666Even satan knows better than to touch it. >>222326284No. They are not missing the point. They don't give a fuck about the point. The message comes first. They see a rival media structure without them and seek to subvert it, and maybe make a few bucks along the way.
>>222326471Because their existing audience is primarily men and when you have limited funds, chasing audiences you don't have is a questionable choice. Most Hallmark movies are produced by independent companies. If they wanted to, they could probably license those for their platforms first.
>>222325306>leftists automatically produce criminals Based and agreepilled.
>>222323763brutal lmao
Would Anne Hathaway have become a respectable woman with a non-whorish vocation if she were caned as a child?
