These are objectivly hoorrible actors. The mass psychosis of them being redeemable in anyway is the quintessence of modern cultural decay. On top of that all the movies they are in have horrible directing and editing so if they are good its impossible to tell whos fault it is. Robert Patterson on the other hand is horrible all around. He has 0 range or style. Everything is monotone and monotemotion. Zoomers literally have brainrot, excess grey matter in their brain from being glued to screen. Its impossible to expline to them why their taste is objectively awful by every single metric.
Go watch The Rover.Funny how shitlennials will always blanket statement anything outside their own tastes as being "zoomers" or "boomers" and that these other generations lack nuance, while they completely lack self-reflection.
>>222328187>too stupid to form a paragraphYour opinions aren't worthwhile.
>>222328291Why would I need a paragraph?
>>222328131Don't watch them, simple as. Your life will be improved and your wallet will be fatter.
>>222328131Pattinson is OBJECTIVELY a good actor. He is a different character in every role. He doesn't just play himself like others do.
LMAO lumping those two with Tom Shitlland
>>222328291Weak b8>>222328187But yes, The Rover was fantastic.
>>222328131Spider kino bros....
>>222328131Robert Pattinson is a kinoisseur of the highest order and will be remembered as such in years to come. You are mentally stunted if you cannot look beyond him as "twilight guy"
>>222328131Pattinson is objectively a kino machine you fucking retard, regardless of him making easy money off of twilight.
