>This was consitered utter bottom tier slop by comic book fans in the early 2000s
>>222334627The first two are universally loved. Maybe some utterly repulsive fringe minority of hyperautist comictard subhumans hate them, idk. 3 gets more shit but it’s overhated and still way better than any capeshit released in the last decade
>>222334627>capeslopGrow up
>>222334668>still way better than any capeshit released in the last decadeIt isn't better than logan. You have shit taste.
>>222334672>still posting on /tv/Grow up
nigger nobody ever disliked the first two films. I doubt you were even alive in the early 2000s.
>>222334688Logan was pure reddit bait and you're a confirmed faggot if you like it.
>>222334627I wasn't as into comic books back then as I am now but I don't remember those movies being hated (except for the third).I probably bitched about Spider-Man's webs not being comic-accurate wrist-mounted devices but I still liked them anyway.
>>222334627>liked 1 and 3 but didnt care for 2what does that say about me
>>222334692Imagine being a grown man and simping for capeshit
>>222334712You like camp and are probably gay
>>222334697All capeslop is reddit bait you moron but logan was clearly better than fucking spiderman 3
>>222334688>It isn't better than logan
>>222334627I swear I'm the only one who thought 2 was boring and overrated as shit
>>222334742Mine was better
Nah, 1 and 2 were beloved. 3 is where it all fell apart.
>>222334802Pretty much, yeah.
>>222334802Yeah, you are the only one, you should probably work on that shit taste
>>222334802nah I rewatched 1 and 3 like a dozen times but only rewatched 2 a few timesthis was as a kid too so there was no irony poisoning or contrarianism or trying to fit in going on either
>>222334627I know you're lying because comic books were literally dying and shipping the IPs out to cinema was what saved superheroes.
>>222334627And it still is.
first two were beloved and 2 in particular was immediately recognized as a high watermark in capeshit
>>222334874>yes now that you mention it anon always was the out one out...
>>222334627Completely untrue, only Spider-Man 3 was panned. And rightfully so, because it's a bad movie.Spider-Man 2 is, to this day, the greatest superhero movie of all time.
>>222334627you weren't alive in the early 2000s and have no clue what you're talking about.
>>222334688>It isn't better than logan.wrong
>>222334688logan is modern audience bilge
>>222334742nobody can define "simp". it's a completely meaningless insult.
>>222334627Nobody has ever cared what comic book fans thing
>>222335592That sounds like something a simp would say
>>222334627only the third was considered bottom tier
>>222334627No they weren't. Only 3.
>>222334688
I don't understand how Raimi's movies are so universally loved, while at the same time many will admit that Tobey's Peter Parker/Spider-Man is too maudlin, and Kristen Dunst is not only miscast as MJ, but also the scripts do a disservice to the character presenting her as a insufferable and reprehensible bitch.
