Why did nobody, not a single human in the 1970s complain about this movie being too woke? This movie is 50 years old.
>>222339384The 70s were the 2nd wokest and most degenerate era of cinema(only behind the current one). People didnt complain about it because most movies were like this and because they were good(while most movies today are bad).
>>222339384>holding people hostage over your mentally ill boyfriend who wants to be a woman
>>222339492Sounds based to me. ATTICA! ATTICA! ATTICA!
>>222339384one well made movie with a woke thing happening>weird. good film otherwiseconstant woke literally fucking everywhere all the time in modern media>FUCK OFFFFFFF
>>222339384>Why did nobody, not a single human in the 1970s complain about this movie being too woke?John Wojtowicz was openly gay, involved with the Gay Activists Alliance, publicly held a wedding ceremony with Elizabeth Eden, and openly discussed their relationship during the real 14-hour robbery standoff. Accounts of his life describe him as far more outrageous, sexually explicit, contradictory, and attention-seeking than Pacino’s relatively restrained and sympathetic version. The film effectively “sanded the edges off” the real story.>This movie is 50 years old.And the robbery happened three years before that. Gay and trans people did not suddenly appear when conservatives learned the word woke. As always, OP is a stupid faggot.
jews control the world
>>222339384Imagine if every bank, police station, church and business in the country had a furfag flag on it.
>>222339650gays and trannies confirmed 50 years ago for being fucked in the head
According to wokeoids the guy wasn't even "gay", since his "girlfriend" was a tranny. Wokeoids think (and insist) that trannies are actual, real "women" so therefore consider the main character to be 100% "straight" and and in a heterosexual relationship.
Why did nobody, not a single human in the 1920s complain about this movie being too woke? This movie is 100 years old.
>>222339384I'm going to tell you something. Al Pacino was not a hero, he was presented as a bum who abandoned his family to become a faggot. The boyfriend is shown as a mentally ill basketcase. It's not a celebration it's a warning
The word "woke" back then only existed as part of sentences like "It sure is nice I woke up in a world where I don't have to subject myself to inane rightist baby talk".A lot of classic movies would be considered "woke if they came out today. But, believe it or not, up until about ten years ago, people assessed them in terms of "good" and "bad" not "wole" and "trad".
>>222339384It's a true story and I'm not sure the story is overly positive towards woke shit. The main character is an unstable man on the edge of breaking point who robs a bank to pay for the sex change of his jewish trannie partner. It makes them look like a curiosity more than people and woke shit generally tries (and fails) to do the opposite.
>>222339384A 1970s sex change operation. Imagine the horror.
>>222339384Why haven't you killed yourself yet? Everyone who knows you wishes you would hurry up.
>>222341325Considering the results we see from modern procedures I'm skeptical there's been any significant developments in the field. It's all godless Frankenstein-tier butchery shit.
Then: Socially transgressive, good movieNow: Socially conformative, bad movieKnow the difference.
>>222340924faar faar faar before that
it used to be "woke" to be against gays and "chud" to be for them
>>222339491/thread
>>222341052A certain subset of tv thinks like this btw
>>222341411you are a person of profoundly limited intelligence
>>222342352Worldview shattered?
>>222339384It was a movie about a peculiar situation, not one in a constant years long line of ramming a message down people's throats. Also the movie was bad.
>>222339384Framing and messaging. It was a story about an eccentric weirdo, and there was never an underlying message about how the medical system is oppressive to trans folks or something gay like that
>>222341411There is something to be said about the intrinsic homoeroticism in fascism. But while fascism tends to be always at least slightly gay, being gay doesn't make you more likely to be a fascist.
that's funny, I was just listening to these guys discussing it I should have figured if Kermode likes it, it's woke
>>222342740>being gay doesn't make you more likely to be a fascistgo look at gay voting trends in Europe
>>222339384The trans storyline wasn’t shoehorned in for brownie points, it’s what literally happened in real life. Not even just that, it was even wilder and a much bigger part of everything going on in real life than depicted in the movie.
idc about OP's stupid question, but man that movie's good. All time top 10 as far as I'm concerned.
>>222339384People in the 70s understood that their failure to succeed in life was their own fault for not pursuing education that led to better careers and adaptability to changing trends. Today, white trash blame larger trends for their personal problems instead of adapting to an evolving world. Their entire worldview is dependent upon the world never changing, which is beyond idiotic if you look at history over a period longer than ~15 years.
