[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


why do MCU jews hate hulk so much? Mark Ruffalo may be a fag with gay ideas but he actually pitched solo hulk movie multiple times, but we got 3 fucking ant man movies instead.
Is it because he's not jewish and came out against israel?
Is that's how holyeood works now? You're jewish? You get 3 movies.
>>
>>222339503
His character would be CGI. Remember Ang Lee's Hulk? That movie was a disaster.
>>
>>222339503
The Hulk is a dogshit hero. They tried to give him some depth in Eric Bana's version and it was stupid. You can't make a movie-length story about some guy who just gets angry
>>
>>222339503
Probably because Hulk still partially belongs to Universal (theatrical distribution rights, something like that)
>>
>>222339503
Isn't this the scene right before the hulk shreks a girl?
>>
File: 1738749683842287.jpg (6 KB, 250x250)
6 KB JPG
>>222339503
>4chan in 2026: muh joos muh trannies muh jeets
>>
>>222339597
Jews are responsible for everything wrong in my life, including my virginity
>>
>>222339503
Hulk sucks as a movie hero. His best comic book shit is narrated and he's too silly to be carried by score.
>>
>>222339503
>an actor pitching movies

i thought that was for directors/screen writers/producers

actor need to keep quiet untill there is a casting call or something
>>
>>222339503
Hulk is cooler than all superheros except superman
>>
>>222339584
Yet they did and made kino you fat jew
>>
>>222339503
Because ruffalos hulk sucks compared to Edward Nolan's, no point
>>
>>222339503
Universal has the distribution rights for a solo Hulk movie. If Disney made one they would get nothing out of it.
>>
>>222339503
the distribution rights belongs to Universal so if they do something with Hulk it will be a direct-to-video shit or a tv show.
>>
>>222339698
That shit was fucking terrible dawg, I rewatched it in March after the surprise revelation that Brave New World wasn't even a Captain America movie, but a Hulk sequel. I mean Hulk himself was fine, but Edward Norton sucked donkey balls, and the movie is just fucking hard to watch it's so generic.
Ragnarok Hulk, specifically during the gladiator and post-gladiator sequences, is still the only really great portayal. Honorable mention to The Avengers, but only when he's Savage. He's a cockmongler in the climax against the aliums.
>>
>>222339921
The Edward Norton hulk movie is easily the best marvel movie after the first ironman, after these two movies the quality of marvel movies took a nose dive off a cliff
>>
>>222339863
this excuse stopped making sense when disney started burning 200m on shows nobody watched. if they actually wanted hulk kino they'd make "world war hulk" as an avengers movie and dodge the solo rights bullshit. they just don't want a main character who solves every problem by being stronger than the script.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.