[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: apocalypse now.jpg (1.17 MB, 2160x2880)
1.17 MB JPG
why don't they make good movie posters anymore? Which was the last one you consider iconic?
>>
File: goodtime.jpg (83 KB, 676x1000)
83 KB JPG
>>222349625
A24 usually has some great posters for their flicks
>>
File: starwars.jpg (627 KB, 1536x864)
627 KB JPG
Star Wars
>>
File: afieldinengland.jpg (396 KB, 900x1333)
396 KB JPG
>advent of PhotoShop means any intern can slap shit together
>studio films are made under increased corporate meddling and indecision so posters are made to be as inoffensive as possible
>social media means infinitely more exposure so less work needed + pivot to video as main advertiser

To name a few reasons. All the good posters are in indie cinema and Blu-Ray/UHD cover art now



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.