>>222352947
I liked it a lot, not as good as the 70s version but better than the original movie from the 50s imo.
8/10

>>222352947
It's low-budget made for TV slop but I really really loved it. Also it's full of nudity so yeah.

>>222353004
>made for tv slop
You're thinking of the Night of the Living Dead remake. Body Snatchers premiered at Cannes

>>222353043
It did? Ok well it has that vibe, still I said it was good so whatev

File: gabrielle-anwar-in-a-stun(...).jpg (99 KB, 1210x1870)

99 KB JPG

>>222353004
this it's based because she gets naked

>>222352947
kino. its nowhere near slop. underrated really, overlooked among the series. several hot babes. highly atmospheric. so much of it is atmosphere driven. the one with Nicole Kidman however, was borin shit. i barely remember it.

>>222354431
S T I C C

File: 78545.jpg (40 KB, 616x497)

40 KB JPG

>>222352947
50s original versión is one of the greatest b-films ever made, much better than Shuterland's one. That final scene is also epic. Didnt know a third versión existed