>be me >rewatching the Prequel Trilogy >aka revisiting that era everyone has very normal, very calm opinions about >critics back then: >“bold expansion of Jedi lore” >“interesting political themes” >“execution… varies” >translation: cool ideas, sometimes delivered like a group project finished at 3AM >fans back then: >half the crowd: “finally, deeper Jedi worldbuilding” >other half: “why are these characters making choices like they’re speed‑running bad decisions” >entire fandom: “this contradicts canon unless I do mental gymnastics that qualify as Olympic sport” >over time >people start saying the trilogy was actually ahead of its time >“misunderstood on release” >“ambitious exploration of institutional failure” >“the Jedi kinda sucked and that’s the point” >slowly becomes a cult classic for lore nerds and people who enjoy yelling about the Council >modern discourse >critics: “fascinating themes, uneven tone” >fans: “love the ideas, confused by the choices” >everyone: “explains too much and not enough simultaneously, amazing lightsaber duels” >somehow both over‑explains the Jedi and under‑explains the plot >final vibe >the series is either brilliant, terrible, or both depending on who you ask >divisive, ambitious, lore‑heavy, occasionally baffling >aka exactly how I remember it >even though I’m definitely talking about the prequels >definitely >totally >no reason to suspect otherwise
>>222361114just let it go man
>>222361114You're an idiot. It was critically panned at the time. You can still use an internet archive and see all the reviews.
I'm a Last Jedi apologist but I don't think anyone would ever claim the sequel trilogy is brilliant.
>>222361114watch the RLM reviews