>Jarvis, invent time travel
>Jarvis, explain to me why there is only the now>yes, sir. Time is an illusion. When you believe you're remembering the past, you're actually accessing a parallel reality where other beings are living right now something similar to what you lived in the past. and when you imagine something, you're actually visualizing a parallel reality where what is happening has a probability to happen in your reality next
>>222407877Name 10 reasons why this wouldn't work.
>>222408037>I'll ask him to name one thousand reasons why that wouldn't work. this will keep him busy, hehe
>>222407877>Jarvis, undress this Scarlet Johansson picture
>Jarvis, print sexbots of my harem, two of each. Then kill my family, then delete everything and then delete yourself.
>Jarvis, invent digits
>>222408079They're doing this on >>>/gif/ now. Soon Hiroshima Nagasaki will shut that board down also.
>>222408099You have bad tastes holy jesus
>>222408099Your taste is fine.
>>222408015Time being an illusion was an attempt to explain relativity which is lost on midwits with low non-verbal IQ. It means that time is like space and in relativity things aren't happening, they are in positions in time like they are in space.
>>222408141
>>222408037>Jarvis, give me 10 reasons why it wouldn't work
>>222408276>science tells the truthNah. Science gives you scientific facts. Scientific facts changes every 10 years, more or less.Truth never changes.
>>222407877>Jarvis, load up the buttplug, the fleshlight, the sissy hyno pronto.
>Jarvis, make my movie earn one billion at the box office>Casting Zendaya now sir
>>222408424That's how I know you are a midwit. My whole post was about the internal conceptual mechanics of relativity, not what is really true. I personally do not favor the block model. My claim was about the statement "time is meaningless" and how it originates and what it actually means. I thought /tv/ posters would at least have the verbal iq to understand this but alas.
>>222408543>I thought /tv/ posters would at least have the verbal iq
>>222408099your taste is bad but not unbearably bad, like 3 or 4 out of 10. You should learn more about some older actresses that utterly mogged current ones at their peak
>Jarvis, age of ultron is better than the other films right
>>222407877>Brain, invent Jarvis. Jarvis, invent time travel. Time travel, take me back to my high school years
>>222409938>at their peakWhat's the point, dumbass? What's matters is how they look now. Nigger.
Jarvis legalize assisted suicide.
>>222410833Its fantasy nigger they can look however you want. That post is about creating artificial sexbots, you can't create a sexbot of how an actress looked 40 years ago?
>>222410833Why? You’re not going to fuck them now or ever. Just fap to their pictures and maybe imagine yourself fucking them. Who cares if they’re young now or peaked in the 80s?
>>222410928This fucking kike troll is nowhere near as good looking as this retarded board thinks. Look at her potato horseface. A 5/10 at best. Looks like a fucking peasant next to Emma Watson.
