If you only knew how bad things really are
>>222487246
>>222487246Why are critics incapable of creating their own works? Look at Obsession and Backrooms. No critique. They speak through art, not words.
>>222487734those movies are crappy though
>Was the literal go-to YT channel from 2016-2021>Massive popularity, every new video was its own event, constantly quoted everywhere>Now they're despised by almost everybodyWhat changed? How do you go from being on top, to having nearly the whole Internet hate you?
report eceleb threads as off topic
>>222487981>2016What's it like missing the best years?
IT'S UP
>>222487246https://youtu.be/zja3pcPMszc
>>222488029Those were their best years though. 2017 was their peak.
>>222488059Anything after BOTW was the start of the decline
>>222487734>They speak through art, not words.That's it actually.Once they become adults, people either become men of action or of words, as in, when they have to get "important" (relative to them) shit done they'll default to one or the other route, with the other one only as a last resort.If something can be done through action rather than words, men of action will always choose action, and vice versa.For example, once these "men of action" fail when an action is taken, they will still keep themselves on that path until failure becomes too dangerous (usually meaning: expensive) to sustain, at which point they'll switch to the other or simply give up. Sometimes though they will dip their toes into the other route just to see how it goes, but if the "water's too cold" they'll go back to their preferred one asap. People who like talking will keep talking in the end and people who like walking will keep walking. Change isn't impossible but very unlikely, and action isn't necessarily always the preferred course either; sometimes diplomacy is for the best.But to get back on topic, people like the RLM guys decided to be "men of words" in a field that primarly rewards action, and this is the result: fame and success, yes, but at the expense of actually making anything worthwhile in the field they're in. When they "dipped their toes" with that dumb gorilla movie or Space Cops and they unsurpisingly failed, they went back to their preferred route (talking about movies rather than making them), and they will do so again the next time they try to "dip their toes". That's what a lack of convinction and effort in the path you're trying does. Of course, the problem with them and people like them is that they don't like playing second fiddle to men in the other route, so they'll gladly talk about how those men are actually retards who know nothing of the craft and that they would've done it MUCH BETTER of course... only to fall short themselves once they actually try it.
>>222487981QRD?
>>222488183Dumb kid thinks the years when he was a dumb teen where actually the PEAK of everything and now everything sucks, unrelated to his lfe sucking of course.
>>222487782RIP Nadine
>>222487835the unwarranted self-importance is stored in the chins
>>222487981>What changed? How do you go from being on top, to having nearly the whole Internet hate you?Tons of competition on the field, and not enough Plinkett.
Their Brand New Day video didn't even break a million views. It's ogre.
>>222488309It's been time to retire Half in the Bag for a while now
>>222488163and yet rlm has created more hours of entertaining video recording than most shithead film "directors" and it's not even close
>>222488269>and not enough Plinkett.It's not like the last Plinkett videos were good anyway.
>>222488419Yeah, but another problem is their format is outdated. Everyone wants to hear youtubers screaming and calling everything woke shit, which it is, but that's what brings in the views. Nobody wants low-energy alcoholics and Jay's weird takes. To be fair, I like their star trek videos.
>>222488309if theyre not going to have spicy takes or shit on the movie its not worth watching>movie was goodok who cares lol. i only care about >that movie was good videos if its an old movie i havent seen and i might watch it
>>222488410Perhaps, but most shithead film directors have a much higher chance of being remembered through their work than RLM does. After they post their last video, it won't be even 5 years before their "body of work" is forgotten as a whole, with MAYBE the Plinkett videos being the only exception (and even then, the prequel ones, no one will fondly remember his TFA or Avatar reviews).And keep in mind that this is clearly a problem to them, they themselves are not fine and happy with the way their "artistic" paths turned out, even in spite of the money and e-fame.
>>222487981They didn't review The Batman (2022).
>>222488519FACT!
>>222488513Lucas is definitely not who I meant by the way. >wont even be 5 years, etc same for the backrooms and obsession guys and countless others >plinkett the prequel reviews were legitimately somewhat revolutionary, they were some of the first and still by far the best of youtube video essays (which suck and are gay) and if you take all 3 of them as comedy films they're very good >they themselves, artistic paths meh, i dunno, they're pretty well-off and don't have to work. All this being said I have serious issues with all three of them but I used to watch their shit all the time and don't regret it. It was good shit.
>>222487835onlyusemeblade?
>>222488163What website are you on right now?
It's time to embrace the listical and trivia formats
>>222488488>Nobody wants low-energy alcoholicsThat's exactly what the Critical Drinker is.>Jay's weird takesEvery other reviewer - ops, I meant "essayist" spews a really dumb opinion under the guise of a weird/hot take nowadays.The new Plinkett videos suck because Plinkett/Mike had no actual insight on the new movies/series. The prequels videos were at least entertaining because they were the result of decades of reflection on the movies and the pop-culture avalanche they spawned, the ST videos where made after a few years the movies came out and apparently that wasn't enough time for Mike to form an interesting opinion about.I also got the impression that, despite their attitude, they found the prequels interesting enought to actually analyze, while the sequels for them were just boring and thus they got over them without much interest.
>>222488631they did shit the bed hard on the force awakens review, especially when Jay (who has legitimately some of the worst opinions on film and probably everything on earth) said it was a better star wars sequel than Return of the Jedi... such a crazy thing to say I like rlm though lol
>>222487981Fence sitting. Afraid to call woke movies woke. Refusing to review Star Trek like pussies while having made their bones tearing Star Wars to shreds.Being directly responsible for the Sequel Trilogy and the end of entertainment.
>>222488539Can't believe Mike made Jay wear a child's bathrobe on camera.
>>222488677>Being directly responsible for the Sequel Trilogy and the end of entertainment.they were probably responsible for lucas selling star wars (which was bad) but they have nothing to do with neo disney and its shitty movies filled with ugly brownoids in every role
Mike likes WWE more than movies these days
>>222488677>>222488631>>222488490So basically it turns out chuds don't care about movies or art at all and just want to hear their own opinions share back at them while they eat their microwave heated poison "food" while they rot inside their rat holes.
daily reminder that mike fucked jays oneitis within minutes of meeting her and then called jay a failed date rapist when he was upset about it >jays plan was to have her come over and get drunk dunno how jay can live with that and rlm won't address it and will ban you for remembering
>>222488757>so basically you go reddit
>>222488592I know you were referring to small-time directors.>same for the backrooms and obsession guys and countless othersAbsolutely not.Yes, they're obviously a "flash in the pan" movies, but they will still be remembered even in some minor, much more irrelevant way, and a few faggots down the line will still go and watch them for the first time years after their release. This will not happen with any BOTW video or Space Cop, and to be fair that's a problem also tied with how such videos were distributed: YT/internet videos in general are much more susceptible to oblivion, no one nowadays knows who the fuck Fred is nor will they go and watch his movie.>the prequel reviews were legitimately somewhat revolutionarySo was Heather Feather for another youtube format that now brings in the millions, it's still a "one and done" interest that matters jackshit in the long scheme of culture, even internet culture.>they're pretty well-off and don't have to work.Yes, I said that multiple times. It stil doesn't make them happy or satisfied.
>>22248773499% of people are incapable of "producing works" because of the high resource barrier of entry, and the personal risk. The fact you need to collaborate with multiple checkpoints to distribute/publish against a culture that almost certainly hates you makes the climb impossible for anyone but the richest and most connected.
>>222488801>I'm a failure because I'm poorthanks for the blogpost and the midwit take I guess
Why did he do it?
>>222488606Dunno about you, but 4chan is not important to me.
>>222487271>>222487981>>222488723>>222488851this guy looks like someone who looked good that one time in that one photo when he was skinny
>>222488790rlm will be remembered for the original prequel reviews over quite a few directors who made shitty fotm movies, and for quite awhile. They're also sort of gaining notoriety for the likely true theory that they caused Lucas to sell Star Wars to Disney. They were completely correct back then and no one could have put it better. Mike might not be a good director or even capable of writing anything funny that isn't a review but he has that and it can't be taken away. >no one nowadays knows who the fuck Fred is I do, and I think many movies that were actually made have been completely forgotten by everyone.
>>2224888824chan is very important
>>222487981They've been boring for years now, they clearly don't give a shit. The difference between early-mid Half in the Bag and Best of the Worst and those released over the past 5 years or so is night and day.
>>222489001>rlm will be remembered for the original prequel reviews over quite a few directors who made shitty fotm movies, and for quite awhile.What's your basis for this?>I doIt was hyperbole, but even then, have you watched one of his videos in these last 5 years, if you ever did? As in, from start to finish?>I think many movies that were actually made have been completely forgotten by everyone.Obviously, which is why I brought in relativity to quantity and chance as factors. But I still stand that any Z-list movie director is much more likely to be remembered than youtubers like RLM.
>>222489044They should just let Jay autistically list minutiae about some random horror movies from the 1980s if Mike gets to take 40 minutes describing a Star Trek episode fan script that only exists in his head.
>>222489233>what's your basis they're memorable and good, extremely popular, and broke George Lucas's brain >but i still stand that any z list director and you are wrong
>>222489313>they're memorable and good, extremely popular, and broke George Lucas's brainSo your very subjective opinion, a fact that by itself doesn't guarantee anything, and your headcanon.Okay, I hope you are capable of realizing why I'm not taking that seriously.>and you are wrongThe essence of Jay's persona revolves around remembering and proselytizing for such directors, so no, RLM itself proves I'm not wrong.
>>222489447>So your very subjective opinion, a fact that by itself doesn't guarantee anything, and your headcanon.>Okay, I hope you are capable of realizing why I'm not taking that seriously.Compared to your objective knowledge of the future as a time traveller? >rlm itself proves I'm wrong That's like saying that botw bringing attention to unknown directors like lens kabasinski or whatever his name is proves all of them are more memorable than rlm as well
>>222489488>Compared to your objective knowledge of the future as a time traveller?No, compared to the pattern I brought up with comparable examples from the same platform in the same format. I know there's a good chance I might be completely wrong, but at the very least my reason for thinking I'm right doesn't just amount to "because I don't like them".>proves all of them are more memorable than rlm as wellYes? Do you really think someone 10 years down the line will do a retrospective on Gorilla Interrupted and Space Cop? Or they BotW videos? And why would they?
>>222489694>No, compared to the pattern I brought up with comparable examples from the same platform in the same format.old youtube when Fred was on top was a very different and nascent form of media. I think more people are going to remember Pewdiepie than most irrelevant film directors as well. The internet itself is many decades younger than the obscure shitty movies Jay likes to obsess over so we're both going to have to wait and see how the field of internet history is going to develop. Also, your example of a Youtuber who is no longer relevant doesn't mean much when many thousands of film directors are also no longer relevant. And, I do think Fred will be consistently remarked on whenever early youtube is discussed, which will be sometimes. >yes? Yes Lens Kabasinski is more memorable than rlm because one youtube channel that happens to be rlm became interested in his movies? You're not even trying to reach the truth now, you just made an incorrect point and are flat contradicting facts that refute it. >will people do retrospectives on space cop and botw and gorilla interrupted 10 years from now possibly, but that's not their most memorable or popular stuff. You don't mention Plinkett who will be brought up as long as Star Wars is still a thing.
>>222488163>They speak through att, not words>autism dumps an enormous load of nonsense no one will ever read
>>222489694Yes, because people do it for other critic channels as well.
>>222487246this has been driving me crazy for years now. can anyone figure out the Jamaican/Caribbean song used in this rlm video?https://youtu.be/gQu_LCo8J-E
>>222489823>I think more people are going to remember Pewdiepie than most irrelevant film directors as wellHold it, I didn't say every single youtubers out there is more likely to be forgotten than even the shittiest movie director, reread my posts. My comparison was specifically towards RLM and youtubers of their ilk (read: shitty internet critics that still manage to be popular), the Fred comparison was brought up as an aside on how you're more easily forgotten if your only output is on the internet - in general, not compared to directors. It didn't mean that any e-celeb that ever existed was going to be forgotten faster than any random giallo director.Of course people like Pewdiepie are gonna be remembered in some way or the other more than any of Jay's FOTM fagcrush.And no, "early YT" is already discussed enough and Fred is barely cited, and when he is it's in the light of "thing that was really popular that nobody cares about now". People like Smosh or that Favorite Martian guy are usually brought up more than he is, despite being less popular back then.>is more memorableWill, not "is", with the point (specified in one of my earlier posts) that the decline of RLM will happen the moment they stop putting out videos. It's easy to see contradicting facts if you're unable to understand what's being said.> You don't mention Plinkett who will be brought up as long as Star Wars is still a thing.I did, in a previous post that you obviously did not read (a recurring pattern in your reading comprehension it seems), I also specificed that that would be the case for his prequels videos only, despite the fact that those amount to not even half of his character's total output.>>222489962>>autism dumps an enormous load of nonsense no one will ever readTwo other guys did. You should make sure to actually see if your retarded strawman isn't contradicted right out of the gate. Not that that will completely hide the fact that you're an idiot, but it'd help a little.
>>222489979The premise was for "inactive critic channels", meaning a critic channel inactive for 10 years. So no, the videos autists make about the Nostalgia Critic don't factor in this.
>rlm thread>seething prequeltard with walls of textevery time
>>222487734Because appreciating art and actually making it are 2 completely different things. Making art is incredibly difficult and laborious, and comes with the risk that people will take the piss out of the things your poured your heart and soul in, and that it might just be complete shit. Being a critic allows you to engage deeply with the art in question without having to create.
>rlm thread>seething friendlesstard simping for fat men in their 40severy time
>>222488309It was a Nerd Crew video but sincere>It was bloated, it had all these useless characters, but it worked for me>Yeah it was bland and generic, but it had a great sense of adventure >It was funFuck you two faggots. No wonder Rich didn't review it, he has a tiny mustard seed bit of decency still
>>222487246>a woman actor person is naked or in their underwear or bikini or just exposing cleavage>OH MY GAAAAAAAAAAAAWDDDDD
>>222487981they peaked with nerd crew then proceeded to fellate disney
>>222490444You have to be autistic or psychotic to actually care about the prequels thats why this always happens
>>222490503AIDSmoby literally said "big naturals" last time he was on, what are you kvetching about
Why doesn't Jay just come out already? It's beyond painfully obvious to everyone on earth that he's gay as fuck.
>>222487734I feel like curators of content are just going to become more important, the amoutn of available entertainment grows exponentially as the barriers of entry drop due to technology, someone who can criticize media properly will be worth more than the actual creators.
>>222489962I read it though.
Why did offtheirmedders pick rlm as their enemy simulator?
>>222490547Jack is surprisingly one of the more normal dudes there, Jay is the woke fag.
>>222487981Eventually at some point most people watching not just RLM but reviewers as a whole will have a lightbulb go off and realize that these two are literally just two guys rambling for 50 minutes nearly unscripted. There's nothing that sets them apart from you and their opinions aren't inherently stronger just because of who they are. And the longer they go, the more chances they have of clashing with (you)r opinion in such a way that betrays their alleged expertise like they weren't paying attention to basic structure or shots.
>>222488410I went back to some of their older videos and I was wondering how I ever liked them.
>>222487981A lot of their best stuff was pre 2016.And they shit the bed long before 2021.
>>222488631Critical Drinker rides on calling woke shit, shit, which is entertaining and gets tons of views.
>>222490578Jay is obviously a chud who hides behind fake laughter and a nice guy personality. He's made literal nigger jokes on camera and watches movies where women get horrifically mutilated, do you really think he's woke
>>222488029>>222490632their old weird xillenial humor feels embarassing to watch now, I say that as a xillenial, it's like remembering an old embarassing teenage memory
>>222488631>The new Plinkett videos suckOld Plinkett videos suck too, redditor.
>>22249063490% of his audience are bots or Indians
>>222488631>they found the prequels interesting enought to actually analyzeSo why didn't they do it? Instead they just nitpicked and grifted for clicks.
>>222488757Movies are not art.
>>222489001>rlm will be remembered for the original prequel reviewsRLM will be remembered for sucking Disney dick.
They completely gave up after the Plinkett marries Jay and a volcano god gets mad about it episode of Half in the Bag. That was the last time they earnestly tried. That being said, the food fight they did in Nu Trek costumes in the most recent episode was the most I've laughed at something in quite some time.
>>222490692Sounds exactly like RLM audience considering they damage control and suck off everything Disney shits out.
>>222490778Ok saar
>>222490767the skit thing was getting old, I kind get where they are now, they had a good style for a while, but suddenly the current changed and it feels outdated, I can't explain exactly why, but they have good senses for entertainment, so I know they must feel it as well
>>222487981>What changed?Bob Iger quit and Disney checks dried up.
>>222490522And what do you have to be to care about virtual people that care about the prequels?
>>222488592>the prequel reviews were legitimately somewhat revolutionaryBro the fucking Reddit infection is insane.
>>222490795Back to watching Tron 3, Mickey Mouse Stoklasa loved it!
>>222490835>trying to do revisionismyou are a newfag
>>222490800The skits fit their sense of humor. Feels soulless without them.>Sorry Mike, corporate said the 18-24 demo thinks the skits are "cringe" so we're axing them.>Yes more time for shilling but no actual criticism. Don't want to upset any future celebrity guests, do we Jay?>Nope! Just hand waiving and dick sucking from now on! End my life!>Thats right Jay!
>>222490559You've failed to acknowledge the fact that the barriers of entry for being a reviewer/ content curator have also significantly dropped. Look at modern RLM reviews or at most reviews you can find on letterboxd
>>222490825>>222490835>>222490849Is this a discord raid?
>>222490878I'm older and I felt like the skits were getting boring.>Yes more time for shilling but no actual criticism. Don't want to upset any future celebrity guests, do we Jay?>Nope! Just hand waiving and dick sucking from now on! End my life!This is the actual problem with them now, it genuinely feels like they are just getting paid to do some organic marketing now and your brain perceives it, they don't feel genuine anymore.
rlm will be remembered as that podcast William Shatner didn't want any part of
>>222488592>the prequel reviews were legitimately somewhat revolutionary,Standardizing hour+ long reviews has been a net negative to culture as a whole.
>>222490912Remember when Mike use to call actors and directors retards and hacks? Remember when Jay seemed genuinely exasperated at what dumb choices contemporary movies were making? Remember when they edited out the awkward moments of genuine hate between themselves? Good times
A strange overlap Ive noticed is a lot of prequel fans/apologists are also brownoids who LARP as catholics or orthodox. So weird at what psyops teenagers fall for
>>222488723Can you really blame him?
>>222491004I've also noticed a strange overlap between people that disagree with me and trannies/browns/retards.
>>222491058I've noticed a strange overlap between trannies/browns/retards and rlm apologistsare rlm apologists actually prequel fans?!?!
>>222490929You mean the fat cunt in charge of his X, the Everything App account, Bill doesn't even know them.
>>222490861>I was always an Indian homosexual with shit taste!I believe you.
>>222491087RLM watchers are white middle-aged neckbeards with obesity problems. Prequel fans are virginal maladjusted brownoid teenagers
>>222490896>Look at old RLM reviewsFTFY
>William Shatner is set to debut his heavy metal band "The *uckers" this September Huh.
>>222491004I have noticed 1:1 overlap of RLM dicksuckers, Reddit troons and Disney adults.
>>222491193The comment section of RLM videos gets more and more embarrassing. I miss when the first comment was someone calling Mike a retard for defending Jurassic World or whatever it was called
>>222490896we will need curators for curators
>ITT 2 prequekers mald at successful aging boomers. RLM basically makes money from patreon and the yt equivalent of residuals off their video catalog. Their newer videos are still 500k+ views, which is the norm since the yt algorithm fuckery in the last 2 years that is trying to bury long form vids in favor of shorts.
>>222492018>hacks grift off of their Indian reddit audienceVery saarccesful indeed.
Why do you retards hate Packard again? I can think of at least two regulars and about three or four special guests who are so much worse than him.
Rich Evans is reddit made manifest in the flesh.
Rich Evans looked like absolutely dogshit in the latest video. My grandpa looked healthier a week before dying in his sleepI wouldn’t be surprised if he is hospitalized before the end of the year
>>222491054Yes, pro wrestling is at its lowest of the lows, content wise, even worse than 94 WWF
>>222487981Mike got his ego shitter shattered when people stopped calling him to do work that he could turn down because another better offer was coming along.
>>222492138AIDSmoby was a damp blanket on RLM during their hottest period. Now he just blends in because they all suck now.
>>222492260But enough about Josh
They peaked around 2014 before they fell off bad in 2015 when they invited Max Landis and soifaced over The Force Awakens and COVID put it the final nail in the coffin a couple years later. Now they're oldtroons with nothing interesting to do.
Tim is fucking worthless. Stop bringing him on.
Rumour has it that they threw a lot of money on their adult swim pilot and that's why they had to sell out to Disney
>>222492337Tim serves a purpose of blocking Beardfat or AIDSmoby from eating a chair.
>>222487981Old and busted
>>222488183literal schizo
>>222490160>Favorite Martian guyyou mean ray william johnson? he came back and uploads AI slopped true stories. he still got it
Jack Quaid fucking sucks and he talks over everybody else like a typical millennial douchebag and I fucking hate him. Josh Robert Thompson was funny ONCE and is the ultimate one-trick pony.
>>222492052>prequel jeet trying to deflect Saar break time over scam calls waiting saar
>>222492775I disagree about Josh actually, although I didn't like him at first. He actually fits in with the group pretty well, and his comments are usually apt and amusing. But yeah at first I was thinking "is he just going to do these fucking impressions all the time".
>>222487734>creating their own works>backrooms - Shitpost by 4chan>obsession - The Monkey's Paw by W.W. Jacobs
>>222487981Botw used to be tightly edited in at most 45 minutes.Now they're a 1 hour and a half to 2 hour slog fest.
>>222492844>>222487981yeah I just kinda stopped watching their channel I think they went a long time without a best of the worst and I just didn't care about any serious movie reviews of modern sloppa.I watch for shitty old movies and Rich Evans.
>>222492775Blame his PR people for thinking RLM was a better choice than Podcast Slop #896
>>222488488Jack always cheers for tits
>>222492844Event tough BOTW is one of my favorite things ever I pretty much agree. They should have topped it at 1 hour mark.
>>222492775>Jack Quaid> typical millennial douchebagYou think everyone born in the 80's and 90's is literally james charles?
>>222488488Someone color this in and repost it.
>>222492899checkedI do like Jack the most out of all the minor characters in RLMverse
>>222487246Ive never watched thiswhy is this shit constantly shilled on tv
>>222488488What movie is on the bottom right? Zardoz?>>222492942thanks for posting
>>222492880Has Quaid not done Macs show? Gurrrrlllllllll spill the teeeee
>>222492928You're someone you useless faggot. Believe in yourself you fucking retard.
>>222492214What I meant to say was, 99% of films released nowadays are abhorrently bad and boring. I'd rather watch pro wrestling myself than subject myself to whatever generic nonsense is in theaters nowadays.
>>222488488Kek'd at this
>>222492942RLM threads are almost 20 years old
>>222492337Tim is good between his 3rd and 5th beer
>>222487246>alright nice Mike, now fuck her in the ass. She never lets me use that hole, it's for my bulls only
>>222487734>Obsession and BackroomsAre these the inly two filns that have come out in the past year or something?
>>222488163Dnr
>>222492942/tv/ is just reddit-lite and the fags ITT love their gen X libtard friend simulators
>>222493016Jay is gay. I doubted for a long time but that little Bryan Singer montage he so expertly made convinced me. He probably had a blast making it https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2Hi-iAZeNTQAt 12:55
>>222493070Arent you embarrassed about using the word libtard unironically
the prequels are still bad movies
>>222488723>he thinks video games are a waste of timeWhat a fucking fraud
>>222493199Unc you don't understand, they're actually complex narratives about politics and life in general, NOT toy commercials they're definitely NOT toy commercials
RLM has always been garbage you watched when there was nothing to watch
>>222493217Going out to see anything is 10,000% more valuable than playing video games alone like a fucking loser
It's just a pension fund for Rich Evans at this point. They need money to get him to a nursing home.
>>222487734this little gay nigga was so good in that walking movie, made me a fan for life.
Half in the Bag is boring now because they refuse to criticize anything that isn't already culturally popular to shit on. They just unenthusiastically mutter some variation of "it was alright" and "I liked it well enough", compliment the actors, and then go on 25 minute unrelated tangents about streaming or theaters or some other shit. They just seem like real pussies now.
>>222487981They dont discuss movies anymore, its either best of the worst or bitching about some bollshit, and even in half in the bag most of the episode is some boring bullshit instead of discussion. Woman carrying man replaced rlm for me, and the have similar reviewer archetypes
>>222493329>Woman carrying manWatched 3 seconds of that and closed the tab. Fuck you
>>222493329>Woman carrying man replaced rlm for me
>>222487486>>222487476what are these from. ucanny
whats the video where they do the soi wars mockup street interviews. i cant remember for the life of me. it was low light funny bits with rich and i think jay as 'fans'.
>>222493748https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2HaGe8XcMHA2:35This video is older than most prequel apologists
>>222487981>too pussy to make a nerd crew poking fun at anti woke grifters
>>222493098Are you embarrassed to feel called out and shit your diaper over it?
>>222493098Aren't you embarrassed by using "unironically" unironically?
>>222487246Could be worse, they could be the pic relates faggots. Specifically Rocco
At least when CinemaSnob made a movie we got to see his wife's fat tits
It's weird, to me it felt like they were making less half in the bag episodes, but upon checking that doesn't really seem to be the case.The ones they produce seem to be less analytical though. It's more "I liked it" or "it's missing something", without going into much detail, although the runtime of episodes is still the same.I stopped caring about best of the worst and other side projects they have since It's mostly just friendship simulator with people I really don't care about.Overall I just get the feeling like they don't really want to do this anymore.
>>222494195The sequel was a massive letdown. Didn't even get to see Woman #2's tits and she had a shower scene.
>>222494305I didn't even know there was a sequel, sad.
>>222492158I always wonder how come Rich, a teetotaler, still looks 10 years older than Mike, an alcoholic.
>>222494935shit childhood
>>222488723Woah he's still with that fine thicc girl Jessi
>>222488677>Being directly responsible for the Sequel Trilogy and the end of entertainment.Directly or not, I'm 100% sure they were part of a kike psyop. Shit on prequels while keeping the people interested in SW, clear the ground for Episode VII.Combine it with hardcore simping for JewJew Abrams and TFA and there you have it.Things got really awkward later.
>>222488851>my feet hurt>what does she wants from me>I wish I was at home watching shitty old movies
>>222490652L take, rape jokes are funny.
the anti-rlm redditors/prequelfags are the worst posters on this site
>>222490835you don't get much more newfag reddit than this, fucking stupid faggot
>>222490652The humor is fine, it's just you being a leftard
>>222494935Combination of Welsh and German genetics, paper thin epidermis, being pale in general all result in rapid skin aging.
>>222490001good luck with that. for me its:https://youtu.be/1bE9K4pqpu0?si=MkpCYu_Q5vcv8v08
>>222493945RLM is so pathetic today because they are cowards. Cowardice is what defines the generation of aging millennials. Too cowardly to have any strong opinions when they can meet resistance. Too cowardly to stand for themselves and openly attack things they don't like, too cowardly to become shills, looking for retreat in cheap irony that used to be so trendy in 00s.Basically this, fence sitting.>>222488677People don't like cowards and fence sitters.
>>222487981RE:View and similar formats (Black Void, Mike & Jay/Rich talk) still hold up really well, so do any Star Trek episodes because Mike and Rich just know a lot about the series' and are still evidently passionate for the older episodes.HITB is ok, not to fussed that they've cut out the 'storylines' they used to have in earlier episodes (as they were pretty cringe), but seeing as modern cinema is just devoid of anything then it reflects on HITB that they have fuck all to talk about. I used to like Jay's takes on HITB but now I just don't care.BOTW is pretty boring now, even when they just stick to the core cast and don't have random scrumblo blumbo guest stars showing up. I'd say there's usually only 1-2 BOTW a year now that are funny, and the Wheel of the Worst or Black Spine are much better because you get some schizo tier shit in those episodes rather than the same b-movie theye've been watching for 15 years. I still watch RLM, but it's not 'peak' as it once was. I still think their best work was around 2011-2014.
>>222490835summer-frogposting-faggot, many such cases!
>>222490177You have been memed into thinking that shitting on prequels makes you smart, just like spitting at the Orange Man or whatever else you retards do to feel better.The joke here is on you, since you spend your time on fight nobody cares anymore. Prequels were mediocre but acceptable. Want to see a really bad movie? Go see a sequel made in Disney.
>>222492138Nah, AIDS Moby is fun, I liked his show with Rich back in the day
>>222495724Really reminds me of phoenix Wright. But it's probably just some imovie stock music
>>222494195Wait really?!
>>222487835He looks like he's about to tell me why there's no such thing as Palestine.
>>222487734Eceleb fucking shits shouldn't be allowed to make movies and shits. No wonder these slops are endlessly shilled, because they want ecelebs to succeed and open the floodgate. Death to ecelebs and simps/
>>222487246>not particularly funny, insightful, creative, or talented in any way>pompous attitude as if they are above modern pop culture yet their film knowledge is exclusively pop culture from the 20th century>make garbage movies that even their fans don't watch>29k Patreon membersThis is para-social friendship slop for fat white "anti woke" millennials chuds. Notice how much of the conversation around them on here is speculating about their private lives and personality flaws
>>222496354Yes. It was in all the papers. It was the first wife, not the second, and she was still fat so don't get your hopes up.
>>222487981redditlettermedia was always reddit compared to /our guy/ with the glasses
>>222496716which one was big box girl? I want to see her big box
>>222496774I misjudged this guy for so long. I know he forgives me, but I still feel guilty about it.
>>222496693They loved Deadpool & Wolverine and didn't like Hardcore Henry.
as a flyover it is sad how these guys are proof of staying in your hometown dooms you for life. those wisconsin alcohol numbers are no joke. if these guys moved to a sunshine state in 2012 they would have had much better lives. mike and rich look like the embodiment of depression.
>>222496833Mike and Jay have always had awful taste and surface level criticisms. People don't come to them for recommendations or analysis.
>>222487835looks like a still from to catch a predator
>>222496774>>222496810Nah that faggot literally has one bit: to pick apart one specific tiny detail then start yelling until he starts shrieking. I hope Doug gets AIDS and dies
>>222493217mike is a wannabe normie but really isn't, he thinks he's above internet film nerds when he's the king of them. all of RLM do this thing where they snidely remark on "basement losers" or "incel" opinions but that's exactly what they are and they know it.
>>222496354Yeahhttps://youtu.be/2ltqKaLaD_g?si=0RyTkeuKXSBkZFSt&t=4881
>>222496866If anything their downfall started when they were courting d list celebrities if they stuck to making low budget horror movies and calling things gay, they would be in a much better place now
>>222496999>I hope Doug gets AIDS and diesAnon...
>>222497159I said AIDS not some fucking baby 'waa waa I'm tired' condition
>>222487246What kind of watch is Jay wearing? Any /fa/ggots here?
>>222488227Damn, that was fucked up.
>>222488539I'm theeking a great wawior, yoda
>>222488723LOOK AT MEIT'S MEWHAAAAAAAT?
>>222487246>If you only knew how bad things really are
>>222488677>Fence sitting. Afraid to call woke movies woke.They're normies with normie fans.>Refusing to review Star Trek like pussiesWhat are you talking about? They've reviewed most of the shows. They did a DS9 review just a few months ago. >Being directly responsible for the Sequel Trilogy and the end of entertainment.This is a funny idea, but I would be very surprised if someone in Hollywood got JJ Abrams to direct just because they heard Mike from RLM recommend it.
>>222497249Some sort of a smartwatch that isn't the Apple Watch
>>222495734>Cowardice is what defines the generation of aging millennialsStoklasa was born in 1978 and Evans in 1977. They are gen x not millenials.
>>222493018They're the only two films zoomers have watched in their entire lives therefore they'll compare everything to them
>>222490644Yeah, Jay is definitely not woke. He has a decent wardrobe.
>>222487981
Step aside and let the man go through
>>222497591they are all crypto chuds except rich
>>222498059Rich won the British lottery, yet he still lives in his mother's basement.
>>222498198>British lotteryOnly getting one STD from banging British slags?
>>222498239Click here to find out which one--->>
>>222492775this, one of the biggest reasons it feels fake as fuck now, like you can't keep pretending he just happened to like it so much, when they pulled that with kulkin so he could shill his gay site (how quickly he disappeared after it failed, uh?) people fell for it, but you can't pull the same trick twice
just be thankful RLM hasnt been taken over by ScreenWave
>>222498562i still don't get the bunny ears thing. what was even the concept? just a simple product? was it meant to be a culture thing?
>>222498792I think it was just a project for milwaukee culkin to dick around with, and maybe it would get big or whatever.Like when he was in that gimmick band
Who even was that weird little jew that accompanied Culkin on several of his RLM outings?
>>222498562Ohnononono.... Macaulaysisters...
>>222499135I thinks it's his handler, as in "handle me and make sure I don't go Downtown to buy heroin and go on a bender". Im not even joking
>>222493845thanks a lot mate! funny stuff
In hindsight, was their Money Plane video the first sign of them selling out? The intro skit feels like someone else directing Mike and Jay and the lame grubhub joke sounds like product placement. Am I just paranoid or anyone get the same impression
>>222498055>I turned myself into a cockroach, Mike
>>222499674MORTY IM ROCKROCH RICH!!!!!
The costumed food fight was genuinely funny.
>>222499722
>>222487981You either ragequit early or make YT videos long enough to see yourself become the villain
>>222487246Red Letter Media is gay and lame
>>222487734Mike Stoklasa into irony-poisoned to make anything genuine or good. Just looks at Space Cop
>>222488723When I saw this and Jesse next to him it unironically made me happy. Chuds will make fun of him and call her walled but long relationships with someone you care about is good for the soul.
>>222493070This
>>222499674Roach Evans
i struggle to finish any of their videos now, they're so fucking boring
>>222500756Don't care would Jessi from 15 years ago and still would now.
>>222488723Why has Mike still not addressed this stuff? Being caught at a WWE match is pretty embarrassing shit.
>>222501184The only videos I care about from them anymore are the Star Trek ones, but even this latest ST one was pointless and boring
>>222501184its not like you have anything better to do
I never watched any video of RLM. Every time they come up here the subject of what they thought of the star wars prequel comes up. What's the list of their videos I need to watch to be up to date on this?
>>222492138I hate his constant complaining about racism/sexism.He doesn't belong on the show, he doesn't fit in at all.
>>222492337Tim is one of the best members.
>>222493088jay gay af
>>222501815RLM reviewed the prequels 20 years ago and autists can't get over it. Their best stuff recently is their trivia videos (barring the music ones) and the Best of the Worst series.
>>222501815They did an hour long criticism of the prequels that was just summing up all the nerd complaints circulating around forums at the time (jar jar dumb, political story boring, dialogue bad) while doing a silly voice
Nobody gives a flying fuck about Mike nowadays. He's a fat faggot retard.
>>222487981they just got boring. I used to love them and think of their reviews as very insightful and funny. They really were pioneers in the youtube sphere and were like the only ones with technical knowledge of film making to make film reviews which was really refreshing. I think the culture war killed them. They made their name ripping the Star Wars prequels to shreds but they were giant pussies who took it easy on the sequels just because they were engulfed in the culture war at the time.
>>222499674
I don't understand why anons accuse the one channel that never got sucked into the BLM mass hysteria of being woke.
