Actually Thanos' plan was goodPopulation would never go back to 8 billion
>>222490518We have enough resources though
>>222490518if i were going to snap, i'd just snap away all the people who were a net detriment to society and/or their families. anyone whose still alive after at least has the potential to be productive. this also removes all lazy people from the gene pool, not just black people. although i doubt there'd be many black people left.
>>222490529No, we don't.
>>222490518The 8 billion number is fake. They are lying to you.
>>222490719fake in which direction? too high or too low?
>>222490743It's too high, the real number is much lower
>>222490719Yeah, it's fake. Notice how the more of a corrupt incompetent a shithole is, the more people they claim to have.Half the world population is supposed to be jeets, jeet adjacent and chinese. As if jeets are not scammers who would create fake people, not report deaths, wouldn't report more births to scam for more gibs.You look at Africa and it's mostly a barren shithole, but every African country claims to have 10 trillion ''people''Where are they? You think African countries report every single death? The 8 billion figure is inflated by unrecorded deaths, fake people, some probably having dozens of fake identitiesIndia claiming to have that many people helps them beg for support, helps them export their ''people,'' helps sell their market as this untapped big customer marketSooner or later people will start looking at the 8 billion figure and start asking why half of the world population is 150 years old
>>222490687Yes we do, we have resource distribution problems
>>222490930No, we have resource problems. That's why actual food is so expensive.
>>222490838Yep exactly and how is China supposed to have as many people as they claim when they had that whole one child policy and significantly less women than men? It doesn't add up.
>>222490518The Avengers completely falls apart for the (initial) target audience of American white people when half all life dying means browns and low iqs die and nobody, nobody at all, cares about those people. Stacy from the 'burbs of Sunnyvale doesn't care if Ranjeeshne dies, and would in fact prefer it. We only feel sympathy and empathy for people we like.
>>222490951why do we have high obesity rates?>>222491648stacy would be sad cause her mom died
>>222490589>>222491648 Why are you so hateful? You're so unjust. There's a lack of empathy and compassion for the most marginalized group of people. Don't you feel any love in your life? You are devoid of anything that is remotely kind or empathetic and it's sad.
>>222490589I would snap twice, just to be sure.
>>222490518when I travel what always blows my mind is that outside of a few hot spots the world is actually so empty.
>>222491612Chinese numbers are funny because everyone knows they are fake but different can't aggre on a single number. One study hinted that their salt consumption was sufficient for like 800 million people. A leaked secret police database had 1.1 billion entries, some for deceased people. They say officials make up census data on so many levels for scamming school budgets and whatnot not even communist party leaders trust them.
>>222490951Food is so expensive because over half of it goes to waste because people won't buy fruits or vegetables with minor blemishes, so the farmers literally just leave a good chunk of their yield on the ground to rot, then they put fake sell-by dates so the distributors have to throw away a bunch of food prematurely.
>>222492711Yup, you'd definitely be gone if that person's plan worked kek
>>222491612It's simple. No matter what socialist subhumans wanted, people just had more children, daughters included, they just didn't report them. You think a marxist dipshit can count or that he is aware of society around him.China is different in regards to human life, but even chinese will not just get rid of their own children.
>>222490930This, we need policies to redistribute leftist property to people in need.
>>222490518I have a feeling that growth rate will decline even steeper than projected. 8 billion is achievable by the end of the century.
>>222490930Thank fuck we got Anon McSpecialist over here who just solved world hunger.
>>222493161>I am a complete retard who has never once solved a problem, so I don't understand the difference between pointing out a problem versus solving a problem.
>>222493328Actually you did neither of those things. You pointed out the absence of problem, which is even sillier than claiming you solved it. A small subtelty that no doubt escaped your armchair-addled mind
>>222490687Sure we do, but the secret of cold fusion is classified since it requires a billion indian and jew souls to power up.
>>222490951Food is expensive exclusively because of a combination of problems acquiring fuel to transport the food, as well as government-orchestrated red tape driving up the cost for the food producers, and consequently the consumer.So both are distribution problems. And also problems specifically caused by insipid leftist meddling.
>>222490518we could stand to lose the brown people to be honnest
>>222493368>I am a complete retard, so I think pointing out the problem lies in distribution means I pointed out a complete absence of problems.
>>222493447Thanos should have done it selectively.total purge of dome species, and also remove all halfbreeds
>>222493414food is expensive because of middle-men. that's how all those chinese and other immigrant shops are able to sell theirs so cheaply; they bypass most of them.
>>222493530It's really not that deep lil bro, I'm making fun of your ass for being so adamant about a topic you know fuck all about, in a way only midwits know how to
>>222493925>I am completely retarded as a joke on you, get it.
>>222490518>We have enough resources thoughlol
>>222490770wrong answer
>>222490518It's hilarious that the globalists somehow convinced everyone that overpopulation is a good thing. In the 80s and 90s, overpopulation was (rightly) considered a threat but then the woke sociologists realized that it was largely a non western issue (Africa, India, Asia) and decided that those concerns were actually eurocentric and racist. This is when the concept of population replacement began to take off. Now, people genuinely believe that we're not even overpopulated and aren't stretched thin on resources. It's nuts.
>>222494400Might have something to do with realizing the population's overconsumption is much more of a resource drain than population.
As a vegan I would snap all omnivores which is like 99% of the universe instead of just a random 50%.
>>222494400they underreport world population to keep people donating to charity and taking 'refugees'
If humans are wiped out in 8000 years there's a 1% chance of being alive right now as oppsed to any other time in history. That's the same as saying there's a 1% chance that humans are wiped out in 8000 years. 2% chance humans are wiped out in 4000 years. 4% in 2000 years. 8% in 1000 years, 16% in 500, 32% in 250, 64% in 125...99.999999999% chance that we're wiped out within 60 years
>>222494400>globalists somehow convinced everyone that overpopulation is a good thingThey have been pushing the overpopulation meme for centuries, it was a lie then and is a lie now.
>>222490518There wouldn't be any of this talk if they didn't try to make him some sort of idealist and just had it as "he wants to kill a ton of people to impress Death"
>>222494469>99.999999999% chance that we're wiped out within 60 yearsHow would it even happen? Not even nuclear war could wipe out humanity.
>>222494469what are you talking about? that makes no sense whatsoever
>>222494469everyone born prior to the industrial revolution was a statistical anomoloy. you're more likely to win the lottery 1000 times than be born prior to the 1900s
>>222494532there have been philosophical phd papers written on this but i guess you know better working at walmart
>>222494565>jews wrote about it therefore it's true
>>222494565But your core issue is you are not stating what would wipe out humanity and just are assuming it will happen in 8000 years. By that time there would be humans in other solar systems.
>>222490518>>222490529>>222490687>>222494400I would love for FAVSTIAN civilization to continue outwards into the arctic, the deep sea, and eventually space. Looking at it objectively, this graph shows the productive parts of the earth all coming 'online' to produce 10 ish billion. Now we're headed into an era of reorganization, focused on delivering tech and resources efficiently rather than massive new resource development. It still feels like growth and change to the citizen anyway, look at the elonic future people buy into. Maybe someday they'll launch a few unfortunates toward Mars
>>222494437>the population's overconsumption is much more of a resource drain than populationNope.
>>222494471>it was a lie then and is a lie nowlol. Sure thing, Klaus.
>>222493391>Sure we do, but the secret of cold fusionWe don't need magic unicorn reactors. The Universe has gifted us with a self-perpetuating super-atomic furnace blazing along with a life-cycle of billions of years, just hanging there in space. It's so powerful and energetic that it's roughly a miracle it hasn't fried us all in the last billion years.And unlike Cold Fusion, we understand the principles of harnessing that power, we are just too lazy as a species to do it, so some eggheads exploit that for a lucrative career in developing magical reactors that don't work.
>>222494609>elonic futureI want to punch you in the throat.
>>222494643It is, its Klaus and co who want you to believe in it.
>>222494680Just try it bitch. I'm super far away
>>222494594you actually believe that nonsense? we're not going anywhere. everything's too far away and space is too dangerous
>>222494720>you actually believe that nonsense? we're not going anywhere. everything's too far away and the ocean is too dangerous
>>elonic future>I want to punch you in the throat.
>>222494690>>222494643If its white people then it's overpopulation, if not then there is no overpopulationThere you now understand how the left thinks
>>222494753Elon's future is competing with Dolan for the most ebin rugpull in human history, he's not taking us anywhere. Not Mars, not the Solar System, not even into exciting hyper tunnels.At most he might build some flaky automatons that run berserk on hallucinating AI and kill a bunch of people, but I have my doubts.
>>222494471>They have been pushing the overpopulation meme for centuriesNot really. People asked the question with less pushback and it wasn't until the 90s that the topic peaked. Then, as if by magic, the narrative pulled a 180 after a few people at the UN, the WEF and other reality construction firms changed their minds. Coincidentally, this was right when mass immigration began to be pushed as the solution to everyone's problems.
>>222490589You're an abstracf brainlet, there'd be no way to actually specify who's actually a net detriment for this to workThis is why all those fictional genie wishes never deal in anything subjective
>>222490518I don't like capeshit but my girlfriend does and I watched that Scarlet Witch show with her. I learned through that show that apparently half the world was erased, but then something like 5 years later they all just suddenly return like nothing happened. I could not stop thinking about FUCKED the world would be if something like that happened and I think all the show does to express that is to show nurses overworked at a hospital.
>>222494824>Not really.Yes, really.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malthusianism
>>222490518Unironically just let everyone in Africa starve to death. The fuck is that going to affect anyone? They aren’t doing shit.
>>222490518Nuke africa.
>>222494469Do I kill an person every time I jack off? Honest question.
