Why do Amerimutts refuse to make movies about their revolutionary war?
>>222496208because its boring
>>222496208because the founders were antisemitic
>>222496496Didn't they just make Young Washington?
>inspiring tales of American nationalism, patriotism, and self sufficiencyVery antisemitic of you anon
>>222496208We doYou’re just not allowed to watch them. >bbbut Im American and I never done did see it??Haha okay Sanjay Rameriez Goldstein you’re a real “American” hahaha
>>222496208Because as soon as the founding fathers start talking about rights and shit, MAGAtards would start screeching about woke and shitting their pants. Honestly, it’s not even worth the effort.
>>222496208Because in reality it was a proxy war by the french against the british. Simply won by it being too financially burdensome for the British to continue
Because the revolution wasn't particularly exciting. For the British it was more a continuation of the Seven Years War, the French being the true enemy. For the American middle classes especially the mercantile ones it was about certain taxes that only really affected them. For the average farmer and farm laborer it was a nothingburger. The John Adams series already depicted the build up in a educated and realistic way. There isn't much else to show. If you go for the almost mythological path where you present it as something more than that you get films like Young Washington which were awful films with no real story or meaningful message.
>>222496208It's honestly a pretty boring conflict but beyond that the USA is already a rather fractured country, reminding people of civil wars isn't going to help
It's too akward that all the leaders were White supremacists and half were slave owners.
>>222496570Americans had to hold out and be sufficiently annoying for a very long time thoughIt's ironic Mel did both Braveheart and the Patriot because the parallels are striking and right there, and the Scotch Irish were the heartbeat of the revolution lol
Because we don’t want to acknowledge how much we owe our independence to the French. Or rather how much the US owes its very existence to Louis XVI pissing on George III’s leg.
>>222496587America was founded by and built for white Christian nationalists, that was the source of its massive success, and you're right, no one else is really an American. Either you identify with the founding ethos or you are a permanent alien in this land looking to cause trouble, and should probably be deported.
>>222496208Because the peak will never be surpassed
>>222496599>how much we oweand when they asked to be repaid we told them to get fucked
>>222496570>>222496588Yeah well we fuckin won and built an entire empire, became a world super power and have a presence all around the entire world while France and Britain are an absolute fucking modern joke. Suck it, eurocucks. God bless the free world.
>>222496208I love the expression on the middle guy's face
>>222496208if they made one today it would be all about slavery and nothing about the war
1812 and even the Spanish American War is way more interesting than the revolution, at least in my opinion. Even the Confederacy Period when America still had a elementary idea of what it was. That would be interesting to see depicted in film by educated people because most people don't know shit about the political system and arguments that existed at that time.
>>222496599It was repaid in WW1 and WW2
>>222496662war of 1812 is too kino to be put on film, what a ridiculous series of events
The average American barely understands that they are essentially the gold standard for European conquest and extermination of a native population. Even the most patriotic white American is rarely comfortable with the fact that they are a product of Great Replacement Theory applied to Native Americans. As it is impossible to discuss colonial and early American history without the mention of various Indian Wars, the film industry would simply rather avoid the time period entirely, or otherwise gloss over the uncomfortable truths.
>>222496208Why do you care? Why can't poorfags that hate American stop thinking about her?
>>222496527how would I know, I have no interest in this
>>222496770I'm not uncomfortable about it at all. If you knew anything about how it actually shook out you'd know that the Indians were in fact brutal savages that spread nothing but ill will with settlers, happily slaughtering endless women, children, etc.They were illiterate roaming retards hardly a step above the deer and the wolves. They had no country. This wasn't claimed by anyone and they certainly didn't deserve it so who gives a fuck.
Remember the scene in The Patriot where Mel says the Patriots are losing because they're doing the same line infantry battling as the British? You can imagine how weird it was when I found out that the Revolutionary War was the war that essentially gave birth to skirmish rifle units that fought dispersed and from a distance. The Royalist Americans were some of the first to utilise green uniforms and rifled muskets and their experience gave rise to the riflemen of the Napoleonic Wars.
>>222496859Yep, Francis Marion the Swamp Fox was one of the first guerrilla war commandos, if not the first. Loved his story as a kid.This is why the fags ITT are ngmi. Every war is full of lots of interesting subplots that can be well utilized in movie form. They avoid this war because it inspires things in Americans that they simply don't want. This is why they make fun of American patriotism in the first place and try to exclusively associate it with trailer park retards, imagine an actually prideful and unified American majority, it would be toast for the craven sellouts that have been undermining us for decades.
>>222496599How is it not acknowledged? France has historically been the one to keep America at arm's length so as not to deepen ties too much.
Nobody cares about the English Civil War.
>>222496588>ironic Mel did both Braveheart and the Patriot??? He even mention the reason was Presbyterian flirting he did while thinking about leaving catholic church
>>222496208not enough niggers and poojeet leading characters. It would be exempted from any film award consideration, therefore they have no interest in making it
>>222496625you went to war with Iran on behalf of Israel and you're losing, no matter how many posts Trump makes wishcasting about how he destroyed their military and the strait is actually open
>>222496505The founders are freemason golems you muttoid lol
>>222496208There's a bunch of them, Google it.
>>222496770you have no idea what you are talking about. my people drive mobility scooters over the burial grounds of their enemies completely comfortable and assured of their superiority
>>222496208I don't know whats worse, the retards itt (probably europeans) thinking the revolutionary war was about "slavery", or the americans fellating The Patriot.
>>222497094>Tyler Durden pic>that postI know exactly what kind of person you are from two simple reference points already lmao
>>222496527If it's about YOUNG Washington, wouldn't it be before the Revolutionary War? He was in his 30's when the War happened.
>>222496599It’s taught in school you retard >noooo Im heckin red pilled on the RevolutionGrow up
>>222496984Brown coded post
We should co-op capeshit for our founders. Ben Franklin is the Tony Stark type
>>222496770There are more native indians now than at the time of the revolution
>>222496208Because it is boring and would be focused on France.
>>222496208>Why do the people who control Hollywood refuse to make movies about the American revolutionary war?Hmm seems like somebody needs to get reported to the ADL for a little antisemitism.
>>222497238sequel is coming
>>222496208Honest answer: because if they wanted to make it accurate, they would have to show that the bulk of the Southern whites were against rebelling and many even tried to actively help the crown. This would cause a whole culture war shitstorm that simply won’t be worth the effort for any studio.
It's the same reason we rarely see English Civil War movies because everyone wants to present historical conflicts through a modern political light. Look at Cromwell, that film depicts the English Civil War like it was a question of freedom and universal suffrage verses the tryanny and corruption of absolute monarchy. But it wasn't. It had very little to do with class or democracy or suffrage. It had everything to do with religion and the power of parliament, which wasn't really representative. The poorest parts of England stood with the King, not Parliament. The more agricultural regions of America, especially the south, fought for the Crown also for decades all the way up to the Treaty of Paris.
