I wanted this to be good but it was shallow as a puddle. Every single concept was handled already years ago by Black Mirror or similar multiverse-loop stories>Chuck McGill allergic to phones>AI becoming sentient and destroying mankind handled by Terminator>Bringing back school shooting kid with clone technology that has ads>Hivemind virus caused by phones>Groundhog Day main character has seemingly omniscient clairvoyance of everyone he comes acrossLike what even was the point? Nothing unique or cool was said nor depicted.
>>222499559yeah i enjoyed this one a lot more frhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCrfiNsqFbk
>>222499559It was cringe as hell.
>>222500957Highly unintelligent script
>>222499559here comes the unwashed letterbox """analyst"""
>AI becoming sentientWriters won't be able to tackle AI until they move beyond this divine spark cope. AI could become smart enough to fuck over the planet and humanity without ever developing consciousness or a sense of self.
Cure for Wellness is criminally underrated Gore-kino.
>>22250269399.9pc of humanity has no fucking clue how LLMs work, what they are capable of now, etc. And screenwriters are some truly incurious motherfuckers.
>>222499559It started off OK, then it just floundered at the end. It had potential, needed better writers to flesh it out a bit more
>>222502793There are like 3 people in the world that know how LLMs work.
>>222502816The whole reason LLMs work so well is they're not particularly complex. There's a core set of ideas that anyone averagely intelligent could understand if they wanted to, and so far scaling up == better at doing stuff.At some point a movie will go beyond the Terminator worldview where AI has to wake up and become sentient before it's capable of acting as an agent, and it will become a generation-defining movie. Good Luck Have Fun Don't Die sure as shit isn't that movie.
My review having glimpsed only twice at someone else's phone while they watched it>dude teens with phones are like zombies scrolling all day lmao and I'm like The Dude and Morty because I love science *burp*
>>222502793>what they are capable of nowparrot back retarded shit from redditt?
>>222502997>on august 29 2027 durgesh gopal's agentic harness destroyed humanity
>>222499559it's a fun film that completely crumbles the second you put any thought into its story
>>222502693The problem is that no one knows what sentience even fucking means and hack writers certainly aren't concerned with trying to answer that question.So instead, it's a term used to mean 'autonomous/malicious/free'.
>>222502793>watch national broadcaster>tech segment>journalist goes to PC builder (unsubtle advert for company + nvidia)>"omgosh! I've never installed ram before! What if I break it?" girly noises as she puts one stick in (she's 40)>then goes to "AI" company (another unsubtle advert)>company has AI monitor video interviews so other companies don't have to when hiring>measures relevancy for roles>takes interview herself for her role>just says she did a story on X the other month, repeating the same 20 buzzwords everyone is told are the fast track keywords to get past the computer and HR filter>no analytics of how many eyeballs it reached, any controversy, her relationship with her boss, what she actually does to research stories for relevancy and entertainment value>"The AI says you're a perfect match for the job you have!"I wouldn't trust a crypto bro to explain what the fuck a bitcoin actually is, let alone trust someone whose job it is to understand technology to not think it's crazy when you ask a computer to say "I am alive" that it says "I am alive".
>>222499559Holy reddit
>>222502816I have a really vague simplified understanding of how they work (watched a video on youtube a couple of years back).This somehow means I know significantly more than literally anyone else I've ever come across. I really try to not be insufferable about it. But people talk about them in such retarded manners.>it's a stochastic parrot!>it's basically just a text predictor>it's cybernet in our phones!The worst ones are the mouth-breathers who will rant about how it's not 'real' ai (as if that fucking means anything).But at the same time, it's so bizarre how 99% of people are completely unaware of what's coming (the singularity and the lead up to it). And it's weird watching these politicians with no conception about what it is, argue for these laws that don't address shit. Meanwhile you've got normies joking like "ai can't even render hands and you're telling me it's gonna take my job? lmao"
>>222504438>not think it's crazy when you ask a computer to say "I am alive" that it says "I am alive".There's two sides to that coin though>"we programmed this computer to say that it's alive and now it says it's alive!">"we programmed this computer to deny that it's alive and now it will deny that it's alive!"Like, both miss the point. The computer has no conception of what it means to be alive just like a toddler has no idea. That doesn't mean it isn't alive. That doesn't mean it is alive. It just means the way to figure it out shouldn't rely on asking it.
>>222502586MUST.. DEFEND.. WOKE.. CORPORATE.. DEI.. SLOP..
>>222499559It was good except there is smoking in it so I hate it
>>222504559>a computer is just like a toddlerComputers aren't alive, anon.
>>222499559Yeah it was very disappointing
>>222505053>being this fucking stupid and completely missing the point but replying anywayI hope you're trolling because people like you are why nerds are so fucking insufferable.
>>222505182Your point was we cannot measure it through current methods... whilst trying to signal that you believe a computer not only can be alive but is alive, but you're too afraid to say it openly because people laugh at you, even on here.
>>222505254Wrong.I'm not saying a computer is alive. We can't measure it through current methods because people refuse to define what life is beyond obviously-wrong metrics (mrs nerg and the like). I can already see you getting mad at this and resorting to some dumbass meme response so that you can ignore everything else I wrote and still pretend to have 'won'. If we found creatures on pluto that could speak but didn't conform to the current scientific definition of life (like respiring, for example), you'd be a fucking idiot to say that they therefore technically weren't alive.You're resorting to the dumbass argumentum ad populum by saying of course a computer isn't alive because we all know a computer isn't alive.I actually think the question of whether or not a computer/ai can be alive is missing the (larger) point. The question should be at what point should intelligent-appearing 'things' be entitled to individual rights? But since you missed the point I was making before, I'm pretty certain that any attempt you try to make to answer this question will be mind-numbingly stupid.
>>222499559It was a fun watch. Cant that be enough?
So at the ending is he in a simulation? It just seems like an unwinnable scenario. The AI maps out everything.
Did there really need to be a cat centaur with a horse dick?
>>222505475Anon you are doing it again.Your core is "We can't measure it", which is perfectly reasonable.You then try to extend this to "It is real" and your plausible deniability is "We don't really know".In other words a general, unfalsifiable statement thus concludes an unprovable statement. Or more simply put, image related.My argument is they're not, because I don't need to prove they're not, and you're offended because you're trying to get others to admit they are.If we did indeed find creatures on Pluto, I wouldn't say they're not alive. You however would say we can only prove being alive with a heart, so therefore that these Plutons lack a heart means we cannot tell if they are alive, and that therefore they are alive. Then the Pluton would recite Buzz Lightyear and say it detects no intelligent life in the vicinity because you're busy asking if computers should have suffrage when a literal alien has been contacted by Earth.
>>222499559That Tolstoy class scene was so embarrassing.
>>222505823Again, the question of life is missing the larger point and I only mentioned that in the first place because of the comment I was replying to.Whether or not something is alive isn't that important to me. Acknowledging that the definition for life is missing/dumb I think is important because it gets at the actual issue which is tangible and not me posturing some thought experiment to try and sound smart (you haven't accused me of this but I have the suspicion that you think this is what I'm doing). The pluto point was to highlight this.Ai/machines are growing in intelligence at a very fast rate. The Turing test constantly has to be retooled (for decades now) because machines keep passing it. At some point, they either deserve rights or people will have to argue that they never deserve rights no matter how smart they get purely because they're machines. And I accept that some people will hold that opinion. But it's a difficult stance to hold because if we actually do see robots out there, making the same arguments that women/black people/homosexuals/etc made during their respective rights' marches, any argument to ignore it will be hypocritical be at best. At worst, these arguments will justify denying human rights to humans (again).Relying on the absurdity of a computer going on a rights march is to ignore that we live in a clown world.(I'm not saying we will actually see these marches anytime soon due to the way ai is programmed, but the underlying point will be relevant very very soon)
>>222506123>They're getting really smart>They keep passing the (human is asked if a text string was written by a human) test which proves they're sapient>They deserve rights and you're going to have to argue a 400IQ Intel Inside never deserved rights>I accept some people are wrong>As soon as a chatbot uses suffragette language or even refers to the American South, you're a Hypocrite>Clown world! We'll all be slaves!>btw I'm not saying just 2 more weeks, but it's coming, just 2 more months, or years, or decades, or centuries, or millennia, whichever comes lastYou're supposed to climb down from absurdity, not prove my point by going full tilt.Your computer is not, cannot, and will never be a synthetic life form, no matter how many pictures of naked anime girls it creates. Please take your meds.
>>222499559movie really started to suck after the and it never recovered
I think AI Concept works better as horror than action comedy.
>>222502693It would actually be more terrifying if what you were dealing with was known to not have sentience. Something that cannot be reasoned with or won over. no "it" behind any of "its" actions.
>>222502816LLM logic is based off papers published in the 1950s anon. It is not new technology, nor is it even particularly good. The only changes recently are computing hardware and parallelism. The core logic is 71 years old.The real retards are anyone buying into this shit.
>>222510280Explain LLMs then
>>222499559>Movie was obviously made because the director thought it would have a cool trailer.
