>>222523165
They didn't use CGI. They used Front Screen Projection, a technology developed for Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey along side of NASA. It's all pretty clear cut at this point how it was done. We just have to get rid of our brainwashing.

>>222523503
why didn't the soviets debunk it then?

>>222523165
You seem to be having arguments with imaginary voices inside of your head, conspiratard.

space is fake

I dont know if they faked it and I dont care honestly but 90% of arguments I saw online are retarded. From both groups.

>>222523586
>why didn't the soviets debunk it then?
Because literally everyone in the world except you and OP are in on the grift, obviously!

>>222523815
Hey, I just pointed out the argument is retarded not that I believe or care that it was faked...

File: Apollo 11 final TV broadc(...).webm (2.95 MB, 1586x720)

2.95 MB WEBM

>>222523165
Faking the moon landing SIX times and keeping it a secret all this time would be more impressive than actually going.

There's never been any actual proof that the moon exists.

>>222523165
Multiple countries have photographed the landing sight and lander since then.