[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.jpg (119 KB, 1000x1326)
119 KB JPG
Pretty good movie
How are the sequels?
>>
>>222526434
they do their own thing so they're inoffensive
1st one is funny, 2nd's ok
>>
>>222526434
There are no sequels. Just movies that use the name because a studio owns an IP and cattle responds to brands.
>>
File: file.jpg (162 KB, 1000x1500)
162 KB JPG
>>222526501
>>222526497
forgetting someone?
>>
>>222526534
never seen it
>>
>>222526434
Terrible.
>>
>>222526434
Pretty ok.
>>
>>222526434
Do you think good movie with aged CGI deserve a remaster version? Not loke Starwars just update the CGI and nothing else.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.