DEHnyDEHng from DEH trolley DEHS?
>>222635832>harry potter..the boy who lived..come to DEH
Yes it's me. And yes I still think that spending time in money on a failed series about Noob Salamander and his faggot of beasts stories was retarded when they SHOULD have done a prequel series about Voldemorts youth and how he went from Tom Riddle (Anakin) to Voldemort (Vader) and how it wasnt as cut and dried as those with an interest in forgetting the facts would have you believe (Dumbledore). We forget that Riddle probably experienced the London blitz and probably started the "death eaters" as a anti- muggle fascist organization with help from more than just Slytherin.
>>222636516The one from August 14 was me. I'm a copycat poster
>>222635832A DEHring synthesis
>>222636516this isn't reddit you faggot
>>222636516that's based
Yet another insipid reference to the DEHest franchise in the history of teleDEHsion franchises. Seriously each episoDEH following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts AcaDEHmy as they fight assorDEHd villains has been inDEHnguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consisDEHncy has been its lack of exciDEHment and ineffecDEHve use of special effeDEHs all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.Perhaps the DEH was cast when Rowling veDEHd the idea of Spielberg DEHrecting the series; she made sure the series would never be misDEHken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just riDEHulously profiDEHble cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonDEHr, beauty and exciDEHment. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfulDEH, they no longer have to.>a-at least the books were DEH though"DEH!"The writing is DEHful; the book was terriDEH. As I read, I noticed that every time a charactDEH went for a walk, the author wrote instDEH that the character "streDEH his legs."I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeaDEH. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several DEHzen times. I was incrDEHulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and DEH meDEHphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effDEH of, "If these kids are reaDEHing Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to reaDEH Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you reaDEH "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to reaDEH Stephen King.
how did they not realize the trolley lady was actually voldemort, kind of on the cuff
>>222635832Kek
