[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1787477604557210.jpg (195 KB, 579x689)
195 KB JPG
In this movie analysis Wyatt Stagg says that the symbolic message that's hidden in The Matrix is that the white man's salvation is to embrace his descent into oblivion, and he then concludes by saying that the good way is to reject this notion and do the opposite, assert your existence in the physical realm.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFTmiAx7R48

I think it's possible the former is the right idea here. It's at least an idea that can be entertained. Most people seem to unquestioningly run with the latter idea.

>For whoever wants to save their life will lose it, but whoever loses their life for me will find it. What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul?
Matthew 16:25-26
>>
>>222733769
>Wyatt Stagg
>movie analysis
The guy is retarded, his takes are awful and extremely forced, essentially twisting any movie into whatever he wants it to be. Also got filtered by Gattaca lol
>>
>>222733835
Not an argument. And besides I wanted to discuss the ideas, rather than the movie, his analysis of it, or him. I was hoping the IQ would be higher here than on some other boards, but apparently not.
>>
ok so how do you wanna embrace this descent exactly. kill yourself?
>>
File: glass head.jpg (1.63 MB, 1200x1200)
1.63 MB JPG
>>222734072
Kill the delusion of a "self" possibly. What is the "self"? When observing another person, and I'm not talking about their body, but everything nonphysical that we think of as "a person", what is that exactly? It's a collection of various things; behavior, opinions, etc. Most of that is a product of something outside of that "person" in one way or another. It's a product of their environment, or it's a product of their genes, etc. When looking at a person you're never looking at "a person", you're always looking through them like a window into something outside them which produced that specific part of "that person". So where or what is "the person"? You're probably not going to find an answer. And this goes for yourself just as well.
>>
>>222734330
So the solution is to become a buddhist



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.