Why can't they get it right?
Supergirl just isn't an interesting character.
>make her sexy>make her slutty and flirtyit's that easy8 billy movie if they did that
They got it right with neckfu
>>222756674Alcock is like a tranny, she only looks """good""" with a lot of makeup and from certain angles.
Women are meant to be princesses, not superheroes. Any little girl will clarify unless brainwashed.
>>222756674Nobody likes the hero's family gimmick. Comics are already silly but the superhero having a superpowered family is a step too far
should've cast hunter schafer
>>222756968this
>>222756686F
>>222756674Even ignoring everything about the last movie I still can't understand how they thought anyone would watch Superman's after credit scene with SG and think "Yeah, I want to watch a whole movie about her."
They did though...
>>222756674They got it right the first 3 times.
>>222756674>look at DCCU>just copy thatIt's that easy but they keep on refusing to do the logical thing.
>>222759830That was good.
why does she need her own movie? So girls can say "ner ner we can be superheroes too" and then not see it? Just put her in Superman
I like sasha, she makes my pp feel funny
>>222759923she is not needed in supermanin fact she is not needed periodthe whole point of why someone made her is because dumbfucks went like, "oh we need a girl superhero that can do everything the guy can do too"which falls back on your point of why does this shit need to exist then ?it doesnt
>>222756674I like 1984 and 2015
>>222756674Why is the latest super girl hated again? Fill me in on it.
>>222759006
>>222756674only '84 and 2023 have sex appealthe rest are basic boring bitches
>>222756674>superman but woman>superman but evil>superman but robot>superman but stoic>superman but wizardall of them failed and not just on screen
>>222756674>>222756686This, it's derivative, and also it was subversive battle of the sexes crap, and now that doesn't go far enough. So it's not interesting an inoffensive enough for Superman fans, and it's not marxist and modern enough for misandry fans, it sits in the middle where no one will watch it.
>>222762436>superman but evilYou have already mentioned a woman.
>>222756674I actually liked 2015 in appearance. 2025 didn't look like that at all.
>>222759830BASED
>>222756674People don’t give a fuck about Superman anymore. People especially don’t give a fuck about Supergirl and never have
>>222756674Because Supergirl is just a dumb concept.
>>222756674They did it, four times. Only All-cock was a misfire
>>222763510It's because she's a goddamn sidekick, and nobody will ever watch that. Imagine, "Robin: The Boy Wonder!". Who's gonna watch this shit? We can barely tolerate him taking 2% of Batman's screentime.
>>222756674I still say Moist Benoist was the best but that's solely based on her neck. Seriously though, great for the part but it was the wrong part.
>>222764803>but that's solely based on her neckShe's the definition of thirsty trap isn't? God bless that neck.
>>222760319The best thing about it was Jason Mamoa.
>>222756674I prefer blondes but Sasha is the sexiest here. Supergirl should just not exist in the first place when Superman is already there. She's a shit character with no good comics made. In fact, you could dump every female version of superheroes and nothing of value would be lost.
Lame character
Nobody gives a fuck about this character literally at all
Whenever I see that 2015 Supergirl I can only think about how small her boyfriend's dick was
>>222760319Snyderjeets hate James Gunn, rightoids hate James Gunn because of a tweet joke he made 15 years ago, jews hate James Gunn because he wrote a movie including a scene where Superman helps Palestinians. He also wiped both the live action and animated DC series to restart. You are not allowed to like it because righties got him fired from marvel literally 10 years ago in revenge for cancelations of other people not related to him then dug up a joke tweet about kid diddling from 2010 as indisputable proof he rapes kids but they'll also tell you youre not supposed to care about diddling when their guys did it because that's all fake or taken out of context.
>>222756674Because she's a redundant character. We already have Superman. What's the point of Supergirl? Oh hey, you know how you're the only survivor of Krypton? Well actually your cousin, who used to babysit you, survived as well. But she got caught in a sort of time warp phantom zone thing and she didn't get out for years. Oh it also froze her in time so she didn't age. So now your cousin who is suppose to be older than you is actually still jailbait while you're an adultThat's the character. That's how ridiculous she is. That's how ridiculous her set up is. And we already have a character doing the same job
>>222760700Did he put some kryptonite in her mouth before she pulled the trigger?
>>222756674Helen Slater was pretty much perfect
>>222767364And yet she loved him anyway despite being a beautiful Hollywood actress, and that's why I love her.Well that and her kino neckting (neck acting)
>>222756674Supergirl 2015 should have been made in the late 90s/early 2000s. A comedic drama with sexy white girls being campy and leesing it out. I would have bought the dvd box set.
>>222756674Peaked with Superchica.
>>222756674"Female version of male superhero" simply is not interesting
>>222762486How come chuds are so desperate to redefine marxism from an economic theory to blue haired wokism?
>>222756674Neckslut.>>222764863Bleh!
>>222756674Because it's just like doing superman but harder. And because WB can't do anything right this second.Still possible. Timm's version was the best.>>222756694The only supergirls that have ever succeded in any medium were so hot they could make nerds start fapping on the spot.
>>222760319Was more generic and boring than hated.
>>222759997she was a great edgy Supergirl
>>222759830Yes. Sexy blonde teen in skimpy clothes punching. So fucking easy >>222759997>>222769759yes. I want tomboy supergirl
