did you watch the brand new 2026 4k restoration of audition (1999) by arrow video?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJ2Zl3IiMvU
>>222822303At this point you have to assume they're intentionally making everything worse.
of course it's going to be more blue. they're using blue rays to enhance it
>>222822303>femdom porn for japanese microdicks and pajeetsburn it with fire
Oh excellent another retard thread full of retards complaining about movies.>This doesnt match this DUPE 35mm print sent to who know what theater, so it's not accurate >Uh this doesn't match my already heavily tweaked dvd from 2002 which was edited because televisions were so fucking shit so this is BAD!>I dont care if it's open matte it's better. It just IS ok?>Who gives a fuck what the director/DP says the movie looks like, I dont like it simple as>Im a torrent watching faggot tranny, let me post about my remux being better than your home theater lmao good goy spend money>Cherrypicked screenshots>Heh fuckin owned>I cant tell the difference>Im not ready to upgrade all my vhs tapes... No difference anyway>Your eyes cant perceive past 720>Not enough 4k movies why would I waste mone- oh there's thousands and thousands? Well i cant tell the difference anyway I'm gay and poor and trannycoded>Faggot poorfag general step right up! Just delete the thread, I've already surmised the outcome of this waste of shit post of yours.
>>222823431Michael mann probably did it
>>222822303ahh *cheffs kiss* it has that bluray.... something, it's that bluray effect. the cheesy old school lighting becomes clean and modern, with subdued highlights and a flatter, grayer look. pure cinema. the experts always know what they're doing when they port these things to bluray.
>>222822303These filters are the equivalent to all the edge enhancement they slapped on DVDs back in the day. Gonna have to wait for all the directors to die before you get better transfers, but by then physical media won't exist.
>>222824655they do those filters even without directors approval
