>Nudity & Sex Scenes in American Movies
>>222874840Female nudity anyway. No shortage of man ass (or even cock) it seems
>>222874885
No do a graph of testosterone rates
>>222874840In the last year women writing in the Guardian have gone absolutely mad for sex scenes. As a long term reader I find absolutely baffling. With the one hand (as it were) trying to ban porn completely, including porn mags that no longer exist, and trying to ban everything they consider porn adjacent down to like lingerie companies making adverts and Sydney Sweeney.While simultaneously constantly demanding more sex scenes in films, oh this film is great for the sex scenes, watch this show aimed at women its got sex scenes in it, ooh I'm so horny, why aren't there more sex scenes? Bring back sex scenes!Its fucking bizarre. One woman wrote columns back in the day about how GoT should be cancelled and wiped because of the rape scene. Only recently she wrote about how much she loved a show I've never seen called Outlander, for the sex scenes. I looked it up, it has a rape every other episode and it ran for five seasons.I feel like the hive mind is panicking about something, it seems irrational and odd. There is a sense of "that thing I said I wanted, not like that, you're doing it wrong". I just can't figure out what is behind it.
>>222874957Yes, but which came first?
>>222874957Microplastics one shot us lol
>>222875023they're just femgooners that want to see more naked man ass on screen, they do NOT want you watching Sydney Sweeney bounce on a meatpole
>>222875092its confusing honestly.
>>222874840I'm not anti sex scene, but I hate a mandatory sex scene. I've watched too many movies where 2 characters have zero fucking chemistry and oh here's the naked back with no boobs, here's a hairy man ass to show you how in love these characters are because I can't write dialogue that communicates it
Has the cuck fetish gone up?
>>222875023>>222875107they want safe horny porn for women and faggots see>>222874885 and >>222874955and not the type of stuff you can jerk off to
>>222874840>100 of the top 100 in 1985 had nudityholy based
>>222875023I've noticed the same thing. Maybe it depends on which part of their cycle they're on?
>>222875125>I wonder what Kino could have come out in 1985
>>222875023
>>222875195>that faceIs he..?
>>222875125It's just a really bad graph
Could bringing back sex scenes save Hollywood?
>>222875195Really? We're just back to "Whatever I like is erotica, whatever you like is porn"?
>>222874840fuck this is so bleak, man
>>222874885Jewish men (ie Big Harv) couldn't stop raping so Jewish women took over and this is what we get. It's also why nobody wants sex scenes anymore, nice tits or a woman's ass and hips are aesthetically appealing. Cock and man ass isn't, even to women, qs evidenced by women not constantly asking men to show their dicks.
>>222875023Women aren't rational. They find sexy women bodies appealing, though not as much as men generally. However they also view those women as competition so why they like it for themselves they hate seeing men view it. The result is this inconsistent garbage where they want sex scenes but "not like that"
>>222875248Is he what?
>>222874885Male frontal nudity without prosthetics is still uncommon
>>222875124Not true. Gay men complain all the time about how clear views of titillating male nudity isn't common enough
>>222874840Wow, right as internet usage rates started increasing exponentially with the introduction of the smart phone.What a crazy coincidence.
>>222875512it's too common
>>222875195Is the -1000 ESG why transformers got 12 sequels?Is the +1000 ESG why Taika Waititi's career was killed?
>>222875323The bottom is showing off the female form, fully clothed btw.The top is just a naked dude. Sex scenes used to use soft lighting and shadows because the purpose was to show the appeal of the human form with varying degrees of explicit nudity because the nudity was incidental to the purpose. Modern nudity is just "here's an ass or dick, maybe a tit once" with no purpose but the nudity. The group that gave us Brutalism unsurprisingly doesn't get it.
>>222875512They are oversexed weirdos as the spread of AIDS and Monkeypox shows. They wouldn't be happy until they could drive to a middle school and pick a boy to fuck as public policy
>>222874840does this include queer faggots
>>222875612They'd probably rather pick up the dads lol
>>222875546Concerned you might like what you see?
>>222875731nah, gays pray on underaged boys. it's they culture. California didn't pass an anti child rape bill because it would have affected male homos>>222875612>>222875731>chud you can't go to church, have a wedding or buy a gun due to coof, we have to stop the spread>you can't just ban homosexuals from having anonymous unprotected piss orgies with 30 people for 60 day for us to produce more monkeypox vaccines, that violates their constitutional rights, chud >>222875744Like all normal men, I find faggots disgusting and hope they all die
>>222875906HIV had a near 100% IFR and only spread through gay sex and even in the 80s they refused to shut down bath houses
>>222875906Lol gays give weird looks if a guy is exclusively into very young looking guys, especially if they're older than 30.
>>222875945HIV spreads through a bunch of ways actually
>>222876013lol no, all faggots are child molesters
>>222876050nta and nope, only gay sex
>>222876050>needle sharingYes fags and junkies are protected classes and have been since at least the 80s
>>222876093Lolno you're a schizo.
>>222876145Its disproportionate, multiple studies and mounds of evidence have shown this. Do fags cover up in shame when they see a child at a pride parade or do they twerk at them?
>>222876178>multiple studies and mounds of evidence have shown this.provide it then
>>222874840This graph just shows the accessibility to the internet. People today get their fill of sex and nudity on-demand in their own homes instead of having to enter some back-alley adult store or rent regular movies with soft-core scenes. The demand to see nudity and sex in movies just isn't there anymore. It's not some grand conspiracy.>>222875906Focus on learning proper English instead of projecting your thoughts about underage people through the proxy of gays.
This is the weirdest twitter shit that has been spammed here in recent years. No man gives a shit about sex scenes in movies and movies men like don't have sex scenes in them. That's woman shit.
>>222876144go look up the CDC's stats. basically every drug user with hiv also has sex with men>>222876145lol yes you faggotall homos are child molesters and should be deported
>>222876221it's not my fault that you are bad at reading, homosexual
>>222876285It's amazing how terrible you people are at speaking your own language.
>>222876363it's amazing how gay and retarded you yurothirdies are
>>222875906>>222875612Funnily enough there's been no explosion of naked or nearly naked 18yos onscreen in American movies and TV.
Cant trust a woman having my baby
>>222874840This image sends Indians into a nuclear meltdown
>>222876649If some American corrected me on my native language then I'd feel embarrassed and quiet down. But American fentanyl-babies like you lack the minimum amount of intelligence required to possess the self-awareness to feel embarrassment when someone points out that you shat yourself, BIX NOOD.
>>222874840Besides the Baby Boom, the US fertility rate has been steadily decreasing for 200 years. The little blip from the 80s and 90s that graph blows up into a mountain was called the echo of the baby boom back then.
>>222874840absolutely REDDIT fucking pos graph with quantitatively illiterate manipulations. Fucking calling something a percentage and then >scaling it so zero is its lowest reported value ... insane. So if the percent of women having a baby each year dropped from 10% to 9% this reddit faggot would show that dropping to '0% of women have a baby each year'
>>222875023how is this confusing? they want to see sex but they want it in legitimate mainstream movies because its shameful to watch porn. women are very concerned about social shame. also because porn is 99% male preference/viewpoint and movies often do more of what a woman would like to see
>>222876694yeah cause men would actually like that>>222876798because I write english just fine. the problem here is that you are an illiterate retard in every language since yurop doesn't have good schools on account of it's a third world country.
>>222876972>because I write english just fine.You clearly don't since you can't even recognize the blatant faults in your first post I quoted. You doubled down on your illiteracy instead. We used to mock Americans for being mono-lingual but you're not even that anymore.
>>222877147no, you're just bad at reading because you're an ESL. the reason we don't care about what you say or take you seriously is because you're a subhuman living in a third world country. you probably have an outhouse instead of an indoor toilet. you're probably seething about something retarded like capitalization when you third worlders confuse on and in all the time
>>222877240It's sad that the trauma from your genital mutilation left you with permanent brain damage. So sad.
>>222877416it's sad that you think your third world country is somehow remotely relevant while posting on an American website, on a board about American tv, in a thread about American films, on the American internet in the American language, because you're a third worlder and you have no culture
>>222875370All of that is wrong anon. You've been fed a line by women and fags who want to complete the total denigration of male sexuality and bodily autonomy by brainwashing you into thinking you have no sexual attractiveness to women.Or you are part of the fag and anti natalist thing.
>>222875124this
>>222874840while interesting correlation, the causation is much more likely the advent of smartphones and the proliferation of internet porn.Sex scenes used to add a bit of spice, but over time it became totally pointless.
>>222875023fortunately they do have an occasional full frontal on tale from the crypt. The episode in which Tim Curry plays 3 roles has a pretty hot scene to begin with
>>222874840But profanity is rising. I'd much rather have more sex and less profanity than vice versa.
>>222874885Floppy dicks, not even hard erected ones. Hardly erotic
>>222874840The West has to reach fertility rate zero and this is what it takes. Turning normalgolem men into ashamed, timid blobs who jerk off to extreme pornography alone in the dark to avoid objectifying women in public while collecting their information through draconic laws that force every website where you can look at women to require you to hand your ID over.
>>222874840cuckservatives celebrate no sex in modern cinema without looking at the whole picture
>>222876972Men would like seeing 18yo naked twinks?
>>222875023Women get off to story and context, which is why they absolutely dominate the erotic novel space, they don't get off on purely visuals like men tend to do. They goon to stuff like "the tall doctor who fell in love with me is secretly a rapist werewolf". Its literally just women wanting their porn to be accepted and normal while banning porn for men
>>222874840booba
>>222880094And often prosthetic or in context that's meant to be disgusting or shocking, like an old or ugly man with a cartoonishly large unit. Or they use lighting or angles to hide as much as they can.
>>222876271Dilate
>>222875727No, just the straight ones.
>>222880834Dudes are into that too, that's why there's so much porn of every character you can think of from a video game or tv show or whatever and why every porno now is a stepbro helping his sister out. They just can *also* get off purely to pictures of tits and pussies.
>>222875023>women make no sensewell ain't that baffling
>>222876208Go back
>>222881094this is exactly what i witnessed in my life. sluts in high school fucking older men, and those same sluts saying no man should ever get to experience what they gave for cheap to countless men. as a teen i watched my prospects ignore me to fuck adults so i fucking expected to ignore women my age and have sex with teenage girls when i became an adult. and so i shall.
>>222874840Sex scenes only ever existed so the actress could get topless
>>222881132Dilate
>>222881184>n-no you!
>>222881333Ok troon
>>222875906In that case surely wouldn't TV and film be filled with naked twinks?
>>222875195I wouldn't mind more CFNM
>>222881973HE probably knows.
>>222875023It's not irrational at all. They simply see entertainment as having only two legitimate target audiences: exclusively women/girls and "everyone". And they believe media aimed at this latter group should be created solely to academic feminist and female sensibilities/preferences. The male equivalent, the factor your missing, should be erased completely. When it comes to the mainstream they've been incredibly successful too. Outside of maybe Taylor Sheridan there's no authentically male (non-academic feminist) entertainment left without having to go to the margins of culture where micro-budgets limit the possibilities.
>>222875023Lmfao, what a cringe retard.Look at this faggot trying to figure women out.Congratulations, you just witnessed a story as old as time. Women are not meant to make decisions.Now kill yourself for reading the Guardian. Fucking fag.
>>222874840What are the top 10 nude scenes from last 10 years from well known actresses? I feel like Sydney Sweeney, Jennifer Lawrence and Kate Mara prob had the most internet hype.
>>222877529not that anon but it's hilarious that you think anyone's country matters at all in this discussion.Is that really all you got man? You were born in America is your go-to reason for pride in yourself?That's sad, maybe build something meaningful to those around you and you'll find some measure of self-worth.
>>222874957Here's a graph of your testosterone.
>>222874885Are you imagining about penises again?
>>222883863>male entertainment can only be either boomer slop or muh dick fanservice
>>222884477Don't be a coward. Name the specific examples you believe prove me wrong.
Good. Sex is evil
>>222879187This is a popular delusion, but while the proliferation of internet porn has gone up, porn existed (in actually very large amounts, maybe even larger amounts than is available online with many old videos never uploaded anywhere) and all the advent of smartphones did is allow more thirdies onto the internet.The actual reason is to do with a shift towards streaming services and the way content is provided and how these services make money off of them combined with increasing needs for intimacy coordinators and various legalities around avoiding exploitation of women.More slop is produced now with less care for content because streaming services want quantity over quality and adding sex scenes adds to cost and risk of uncontrolled marketing backlash or an age-restriction on potential viewership (the cattle they milk with a monthly sub).
>>222874840based zoomers