When I watch old films I'm shocked by how bright outdoor scenes are.
This is incredibly racist.
>>222877315That’s because old films used to go crazy with colorization and technicolor to get people in seats to see the color picture. It was in the marketing even.
>>222877315People used to go outside so it was harder to sell the idea that the world is a mess of dark dimmed blue shades (unless it's Mexico/Arabland where it's dimmed orange shades).
>>222877315oh sorry guess we need to put fifty shades of blue and grey on here i guess right retard?
>>222877315boomchuds couldn't make natural color. all their shit looks like someone fucked up the saturation slider in post. boomers couldnt see natural colors because their shitty film ink chemicals biased yellow and green. kek boomers
>>222877799Do you check under your bed for """boomers""" before you go to sleep at night?
>>222877315Where are all the POCs? Fuck this nazi shit
>>222878493>>222877406This is the direction they'll go as they're very predictable, almost like AI programs. >The White Nationalist Dog Whistle behind the belief old movies looked better>Despite all the progress made in the last decade, mcuh more work needs to be done for diversity, and representation of minority groups. But online white nationalists, blinded by bigotry and misogyny, wishes that movies should look like they did in their grand parents days. Blinded by contrarianism for an idealized fake world that never existed, they wish to erase marginalized voices.
>>222878661>Oh no he's hot
>>222877315i thought hollywood made things brighter with time so we can see blacks better?
>>222878651>they wish to erase marginalized voices.Marginalized voices aren't worth hearing, for they have nothing of value to say, else they wouldn't have been marginalized.
>>222878694You gotta play their game, and then double down on it and do a better job. Their "marginalized voices" are themselves and their buddies: they're rich middle class kids with student debt they need paid off. Their #1 priority is to get jobs for themselves, not to help any underprivledged class.
>>222877315Jewish demoralisation tactics took this from you
>>222878850Jews were mostly the businessmen in charge of Old Hollywood though (for good and for bad - for instance they liked to grope and rape women).
Satellites block the sunlight nowadays.
>>222877315move to digital plus the matrix brainwashing the whole industry that movies need to have a le color filter
>>222879001Traffic and Fincher is the one who really solidified the tints though.
>>222877406Is this more your speed?
>>222877315Nevermind the color. Why can't this woman run normally?Look at those arms! It's like she's doing crawl.
motion picture film stocks which are not made anymore, these days the only motion picture film producer is kodak, and there are only two stocks that are produced
>>222877315Old films look beautiful except the day for night shots always distract the shit out of me
>>222879362still better than digital.
>>222877315>normal colors>I'M SHOCKED I'M LITERALLY SHAKING RIGHT NOW HOW IS IT EVEN ALLOWED WHERE IS GREEN TINTFucking zoomers
>>222879280She's running on an uneven ground. This is not your jogging track, can't you see she's in the mountains?
>>222877315yeah movies used to look nicego figure
>>222877315less non-white colors everywhere
I watch all my movies on my pc.75hz monitor, i could change it to 72 to reduce stuttering but i don't.Blue light filter is set to strong at all times.Monitor is at like 10 on the brightness (out of 100).Normal normalization is on, system wide.
The skies in old movies are actually blueLook at any movie made in the last few years and the sky will almost always be grey, even if it's supposed to be a bright cloudless day
>>222880709It is, and i call it the overcast sky problem. It's because of the desaturation, dimming, and tinting, all in the name of "cinematic" look.
>>222880709Happy Gilmore original vs.
>>222880943
>>222880953
>>222880953>>222880965So are they actually shooting this on a cloudy day? It can't just be them fucking around with the levels and stuff.You look at the old movie >>222880943 and every object has a bright yellowish highlight on the top and hard shadows on the ground, both of which are absent in the new movie.
>>222881002>So are they actually shooting this on a cloudy day? It can't just be them fucking around with the levels and stuff.No, these are bright sunny days. They have a whole color grading process and intentionally make the films like this.
>lost technology
>>222880943>>222880953notice how everyone is in focus in the original movie, and how the second movie uses depth of field to blur everything but Sandler? That's why movies look like shit now, it's not the fault of digital, it's the excessive use of DoF. Colorgrading is also terrible but that can at least be fixed with a remaster. Everything being blurred making it look like a commercial is harder to fix
>>222877444OP's example basically has zero colour correction.
>>222881118'person in focus with blurred activity behind them' always makes me think of shows like Hoarders and Trading Spaces and all those 'reality' TV shows where people do their little testimonials to the camera as things happen
>>222880709The sky in the most of movies since 2011 is closer to gray- teal- green than blue.And occasionally you get a fucking green sky.
>>222881207Tried fixing it. The sky is still too overexposed but oh well.Besides color grading framing and blocking are also a lost art. I'm gonna presume that the camera is tracking the guy on the horse, but it is for some reason at roof level, too high to be from the POV of a guy on a horseback. It makes the scene completely intangible, more like a cutscene than a real movie. It's why imo helicopter shots look better than drone shots.
>>222881471It's impossible to fix shitty color grading, no matter how much you will tinker with sliders and histograms. You deal with lost information. It's the same as trying to fix a wrong exposure in a photo.
Sunlight used to be much more yellow, now it's starting to become almost white. Ask any scientist, they'll tell you that our sun is changing colors rapidly in the last 200 years.
>>222881976Why would I ask a scientist when I have /tv/ schizos to tell me the real truth?
>>222881516Yeah i know that. It's a damn shame though.
>>222877315color has always been a post production effort. they have lost some skills over the years but the modern movies are dark and shitty because thats what they want them to look like, not because they cant make it bright and happy. >Technicolor works by using a specialized camera with a prism to split incoming light into separate red, green, and blue color channels, recording them onto individual black-and-white film strips that are later dyed and combined
>>222881111movies both men and women can understand
>>222882131Yes, LOST technology.Every single time there's a "don't worry, here's a modern film that has nice colors!" and you check the specs, it's always shot on 35mm film. Every god damn time. yes, there's a few times there will be a throwback film, but they can't do it with digital. It's all lost tech.
>>222882160I mean you can go on youtube right now and watch a vibrant video with blue skies that was shot on digital. It's not lost tech, it's just for whatever reason uniformity has become a massive meme in hollywood, probably largely thanks to David Fincher, every shot has to be "balanced" you can't have too wide of a color gamut, you can't have intense contrast ratios, it needs to look "filmic" aka uniform.
>>222881976I made an experiment with my old 2003 digital camera I still have at home (in 2003 the sun was yellow, everything was better, etc). The same place as 20 years ago, noon, afternoon, sunset. There IS a slight shift in the sun color. Probably less particles in the air, like dust, pollutants, pollen, etc. Either way, schizos are right about this one.
>>222882582Not only is it washed out, but all the colors are gone. Everyoen wears black like they're nuns, or brown because it's leather? Why would they assume that people of the apst wouldn't have as much color as people of today would have? Why would there be an obsession with browns and blacks? Why? It's only a few choice colors, like purple, because they needed to find special dyes made from snails or some shit, but that's the exception rather than the norm. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrian_purple
Sorry incels, that your life didn't work out the way you hoped. I can only imagine the amount of knee jerk contrarianism needed to justify wanting all media to look like the candyland cartoons you grew up with. Hint: He-Man and Transformers are for kids. Touch grass, and watch A24.
>>222882585>1997wut
>>222882626That also applies to modern stuff. You won't see a character in modern movies wearing bright clothes unless there's a wacky reason. Marty McFly's red vest would be too distracting for modern film makers.
>>222879248Kek
>>222882637>Noooo incels aren't allowed to even have fantasy escapism!!!How fucking evil can you get, seriously? What did we ever even do to you? We're just minding our own business and you hate us because we've never had sex. Wtf?
Thing that really grinds my gears is when it's supposedly very cold but the weather never looks right.When it gets very cold (around -30c) the sky is usually extremely blue to the point where it looks unreal, and as the temperature keeps going down you get this cold mist as the last remnants of humidity turns to ice.
>>222882976yeah the air is crystal fucking clear when its cold out.
>>222879248Is that Mad Heidi?I don't remember that scene.
>>222877315It's so weird when you're cooped up indoors for a few days watching films then you go outside and it's 100x more vibrant and beautiful
>>222882976What's conspicuous is they don't cover their head when it's cold. In this scene their hair in covered in snow but they don't put their hood on. It makes no sense.
>>222882637I just did it. The grass is green, the sky is blue and your kiked movies look like shit.
>>222882637>create propaganda for goyim>make it over the top ugly and off- puttingKick the Schlomo Retardberg out of Hollywood and replace him with somebody competent.
we can go back and fix these crusty boomer flicks
>>222877315I don't remember this part from The Sound of Music
>>222882626Not to mention the historical accuracy and fashion>ancient and medieval times: colors are a sign of status, everybody wants to look like a peacock pimp>XVII century Europe: everybody wants to look like a peacock pimp AND wears stockings, laces, ribbons and whatever faggy shit he can get, because textile industry is now a thing
>>222877315I'm so sick of gray movies.
>>222883498I think there's some weird misunderstanding that people in the medieval times dressed like monks, and they just have conflated monks with everyone else. Like they think they prayed all the time, dressed in dull colors, lived meek and humble lives. Monks are probably the best known medieval image that they can conquor up, so they just go with that.
>>222880484Correct.
>>222881976Sunlight has been white the whole time, but there is a small difference if you live in a dense urban environment because the air is cleaner in most first world cities today than in 2000 (there is no industry in the middle of cities anymore, polluting heating systems are banned, less car travel and with six millions filters on exhaust).
>>222882160its digital. they can make the colors anything they want. they can replace all the blue with yellow if they want. there are no limitations at all. they dont want it to be colorful. it is a creative decision.
>>222882364I saw this on youtube years ago and was shocked by the accurate colors. Everything is so dull that normalcy stands out.
air pollution is the problem
>>222883857>when the "making of" looks better than the show
>>222880953Jesus, did Snyder shoot this with his cracked soviet camera?
>>222882567Oh, we have one example straight from Scott, the same scene. Look at this shit. No, nobody fucked with the top one, that's how it looks like in the movie.
too bad argento movies are boring
>>222884175*bottom one
>>222883682>>222884175see
>>222881118Also what I saw. honestly the sky - what tiny bit you can see - is more blue in the newer film, just a lighter shade. Older film is warmer, more pink in the sky. It also has a lot more color contrast and variety. Pinks and reds and yellows in the shirts and the brown gator contrasting with all the green and Sandler's lighter clothes.The newer one is just white and green, with a blue Sandler and blue scoreboard centered.
you are imagining things, chud
>>222880574Based anon won't let the jews mess up his kino with their subversive vision.
>>222880953why the fuck is everything so teal
Are colors just not allowed anymore? Even 2d or 3d animated movies are going the same direction.
>>222879375Night scenes were a mixed bagged between actually pitch black except for foreground objects and clearly shot during the day but then had the exposure fucked with.Modern night scene are all blue and I hate it.
IMO it's similar to how high framerates are viewed as cheap soap opera slop; natural colors became seen as amateurish and color grading became associated with cinematic techniques, visual storytelling, blah blah blah.
>>222879248kek OP BTFO
