>burn the wealth, kill the rich aristocracyDangerously based film.
>>223185642Just make a film where the heroes kill tech ceos at this point. Monarchs seem like sweaty pies in comparison
>>223185680The censorship in film industry makes it to where we have to make it about monarchs instead of tech oligarchs. I just imagine the king and advisors are facebook, twitter, youtube ceos
In b4 some guy who thinks he's John Galt because he's making 90K/year as a plumber or something shows up to defend crapitalism and medieval social hierarchies he'd be at the bottom of.
>>223185703Tech oligarchs wouldn't be so powerful, if they weren't linked up with a govt that can print endless money which all other currencies are pegged to. Who believes Amazon went from hosting cloud services, to suddenly building data centers (sucking up local resources of water/electricity + real estate) for AI? All on billions' worth of govt contract? Obamacare was written by an ex-Anthem insurance/Wellpoint woman (elizabeth fowler who "counseled" a dem senator), now Bernie Sander's AI bill is written by an Athropic-linked lobby group too. Same grift of regulatory capture to leech off the common person.
>>223185680This. A medieval lord wasn't trying to replace his subjects with Somalis and Indians to make the merchant class 5% richer.
>>223185754Even All of a Sudden reviews blame "capitalism", as if they're too ignorant or afraid to simply point out companies don't have to please the customer best to survive the competition, if they RIG the industry with GOVT HELP. Hurdles in lawsuits fees/time, non-transparency (esp if media/stocks are manipulated), and same ol' regulatory capture (theater of giving a stern talking to, but policies are written WITH corporate lobbies.)
>>223185819to be fair, the medieval lord didn’t have the ability or technology to even outsource jobs like that.
>>223185642Why do people tolerate any kind of social hierarchy at all?Imagine if you washed up on an island in the middle of nowhere. You're building a shelter and enjoying a delicious coconut and some old guy comes running up and says that he owns the island because he washed up there first. But he'll let you have one coconut a day if you work for him for 40 hours a week. You'd tell him to fuck off, right?
>>223185879Yeah, the problem is the old guy would pull up strapped to the teeth with weapons you dont have
>>223185642>aristocracyDumb OP.>>223185703>oligarchsSPBP.
>>223185879what if he had 7 sons who could murder you outright?what if he developed a social structure with every other denizen of the island against you?what if you were the asshole?
>>223185819a medieval lord had far more control in the lives of his subjects than a modern CEO.serfdom has existed in europe for centuries, the people were literally tied to the land with zero social mobility.and the lord absolutely brought in some fresh people from elsewhere during farming season, construction projects, famine or drought to keep the land worked and his own pockets filled.you keep forgetting that your notion of "white" is a 19th century invention. if the medieval lord of brunswick brought in some slavs, sudetengermans, bavarians, alsacians, frisians and walloons to work in the region, the local saxon would sperg out even more about these strangers than you do about indians and somalis. they came from a different cultural tradition and spoke a different dialect/language and often followed a different branch of christianity, there was no common feeling of solidarity, the fact that they all had the same skin color was inconsequential.your laughable notion of race has warped your brain so far that you sympathize with the absolute feudal lord who can literally order you who to marry, instead of the billionaire ceo who doesnt give a fuck about you. you don't even realize how free you really are
>>223185879>Why do people tolerate any kind of social hierarchy at all?Because men are different, retard - and only baby anarchist/dumb lefties like you are afraid of hierarchy in ANY LEVEL.Your whole shitty coconut example was viced and wrong from the core.
Why do we have to kill people?Can't we talk out our differences?
>>223185819Medieval lords and XVIII century aristocrats were absolute assholes detached from reality, just like the current fuckers from Brussels.The sheer number of peasant uprisings and eventually the Spring of People should tell you enough why your ancestors decided to board the ship to America.
>>223186116>>223185977based and realitypilled
>>223185977>if the medieval lord of brunswick brought in some slavs, sudetengermans, bavarians, alsacians, frisians and walloons to work in the region, the local saxon would sperg out even more about these strangers than you do about indians and somalis. they came from a different cultural tradition and spoke a different dialect/language and often followed a different branch of christianity, there was no common feeling of solidarity, the fact that they all had the same skin color was inconsequential.It kinda worked in Polish- Lithuanian Commonwealth. The territory was so vast and underpopulated, that a village of complete strangers appearing here and there hardly affected the social order.And the nobles were still assholes. Correspondence unearthed from Church archives led to a surprising conclusion that an average peasant spend the most of his time not on drinking and beating his wife (commie version) but on writing lawsuits against the local lord.
>>223185642He was originally carrying a hammer as well, but then they decided it's too on the nose.
>>223185680And at the end the camera pulls back to show the movie set and the wealthy actors smile and wave to the middle class factory workers sitting in the audience.
>>223185642>Number of peasant rebellions that were successful throughout history: 0
>>223185977>>223186611>>223186860You're all retards. Unemployment is an invention of the modern world. Back then you ALWAYS wanted more labourers.
