Why did Disney kill one of the few original movie ideas that held any promise of being good?
>>223190614>I smell the blood of a Pakistani englishmenDidn't work with mermaid
>>223190614Gigantic is going to come out under Skydance. Obviously, not the same movie, but come on. Skydance has poached a few big Disney names and their upcoming schedule looks interesting.
Somehow in their entire corporate mega globalist galactic empire they had not one guy on that production chain that alerted people that giantess would bring out people en masses well beyond mere tangled and frozen fans. Id have watched it and I missed all of those
>>223190614Every decision at Disney is based on weird internal politics and different factions of executives all trying to pull the rug out from under each other. RARELY do they ever get together and decide to just make money, and that's why they've been hemorrhaging cash year on year for several decades. They're just snakes all biting each other, nobody has any vision or desire to create art, they would rather scuttle each other's projects than come up with their own.
>>223190614Because I want to worship a giant MILFs feet
>>223190773Why do people with inane niche fetishes always try to tell themselves/others that everyone has said fetish?
>>223190753They gave it a stupid name though, "Eddie in the Beastalk" doesn't inspire confidence
>>223190977Better than Gigantic in my opinion. Though, any title for this movie is probably gonna sound corny on some level.
>>223191008Fair. But yeah, we'll see how good it is. Hopefully it's good.
>>223190940This isnt like feet or something weirder. Liking giant girls isnt something people hide or even have to fetishize to enjoy, I dont masturbate to giant women or desire tall women (I like short girls) THAT SAID i love the cartoony image of a goofy giant girl leading around the male protagonist who will likely be resourceful despite being ant sized. Its adorable sounding, fun for kids, women, men who have humor and childlike wonder. And fetishists. But like I said it doesnt have to be something that gives you a stiffy to find it a desirable design. Its a fun spin on the romance template, and it feels more fantasy aswell.
>>223191008With the prior titles being tangled and frozen gigantic absolutely sounds like the right title, huge mistake dropping it but this movies entire time line is the execs not knowing what theyre doing. Could use pixies song for one of the trailers and bam you have a huge amount of gen x and redditors getting stoked, not to mention every girl who liked frozen will probably show up
>>223191223Yeah, but they were all changed to those titles after Princess and the Frog flopped. So to me, it just sounds like corporate meddling for marketing.
>>223190614Because the bunny makes 2 billion per movie easy.
>>223190614Disney doesn't want fetish appeal, it's a bad look, that's why they released Zootopia instead.
