now that the dust has settled, was this movie actually kino? i'm inclined to say that in fact, it was
You have to have worked in a theatre to fully get it. When you do, eevry characetr is someone you know.
The meta commentary on his career alone is brilliant. Especially when he did Batman again in The Flash, lol.
yes but only because I love theater backstage areas and this film has plenty of those
>critic is critical>haha fuck you i'll just kill myself dumbassdid keaton win this exchange?
>>223204347I just rewatched it in preparation for Digger. I felt now what I felt when I first watched it, it is good not great. The only scene that was outright bad was the one where Keaton and Stone fight about the flaws of the other generation. It is way too showy in a movie that is already too showy, and it is just pure jejune dialogue.
>dude what if capeshit but uhhhhhhhhhh>a film by random no name mexican or something>worst emma
little known fact is that every one of them played themselves
it made me annoyed that Edward Norton is good but so much of an asshole nobody will put him in movies anymore
I think it's kino for sure. But I agree with some of the other anons that the fact that I'm a theaterfag may be giving me a large bias.
>>223204974He's one of those actors that isn't actually a good actor but simply delivers unremarkable performances. A true B lister and there is nothing wrong with that.
>>223204347yes>>223204505yes
>>223204974doesn't he ALSO play an annoying prick that nobody wants to hire in this film as well? The meta never ends
>>223204347Hey, remember when Johnny Depp saw the "I am Crow" artwork by Kirby Sattler, which was a depiction of a Crow Indian warrior with a crow flying behind his head, but Johnny Depp didn't understand depth and angles and thought the Indian was wearing a crow hat on his head, and insisted that Tonto in the Lone Ranger have a crow perched atop his head the entire film, much to the production crew's chagrin?Birdman came out the next year with artwork depicting the birdman character perched atop Michael Keaton's head. Clearly this is to indicate the psychological grip the Birdman character had on his mind, but part of me has always believed they were also making a joke out of Johnny Depp being a retarded movie star who wore a bird on his head for an entire film that flopped really really hard, since that concept would also tie in to the themes of that movie. Just something I've always pondered, like the quarterback and halfbacks of Notre Dame thing.
it was ok, Inarritu will never top Amores Perros
>>223204347I loved it but Good Lord if Iñarritu isn't a huge faggot
>>223204347Yes, because it's on the /tv/ patrician list
>>223204749Yeah, that's my only real complaint too, but I still love this movie
>>223205435>autistic man doesn't understand humorwell said, retard
>>223204347Yes, it masterfully defines and reveals real art from commercial 'art'. If I had 10 actors with Nortons characters mindset I would change the world through film and theater.
>>223204749>The only scene that was outright bad was the one where Keaton and Stone fight about the flaws of the other generationThat's a great scene with maybe the best quote in the movie
>>223205402Nigger what. American History X, Kingdom of Heaven, Fight Club, etc none of those are unremarkable performances
