Why aren't there cool heroines in action movies anymore?
>>223377000because they're all girl bosses now
Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga bombed
>>223377069Anya Taylor-Joy isn't an action star, that's why.
Because seeing a woman for more than five seconds is woke, apparently.
>>223377000Fuck, kill, marry
>>223377000First Underworld had such a cool atmosphere. I tolerated the sequels for she. I really did like the prequel movie though.
hot, young-ish women were deemed problematic
>>223377000>why aren't there woke garbage while Chad is presidentgee i wonder faggot kamala voter
>>223377000because watching women pretending to be men is almost as bad as watching men pretending to be women
>>223377000woke happened
>>223377000Because it makes ugly spinsters mad, and they're apparently the only audience worth chasing despite the fact that they never watch anything beyond self-insert romance slop.
>>223377257you'd seriously marry Jolie? Look at her fucking adopted kids kek.
>>223377257>marrying JolieBrad made the same mistake and now he's back on the bottle circling the drain lol. Milla is obviously the right answer.>>223377069>>223377106I thought she was the main star for The Hunt for Gollum?
>>223377000theyre doing onlyfans now, oy vey!
They're popularity has fallen after we discovered what Harvey was doing with them all.
>>223377000Because directors (((wives))) got jealous.
>>223377257marry and fuck multiple times daily, kill, kill
Their daughters are beautiful
>>223377000because nothing is cool or heroic nowadays, let alone beautiful/sexy or fun. Hell, even the action part is...Fuck this inbred contrarian timeline
>>223377069It was shitThe female character was ugly as sinit's a prequelshit to a boring reboot about a character nobody cares about
>>223377222Only the shit women woketards make
>>223378752Please tell me this board's riddled with unc types old enough to remember the original V.
>>223377633The character, obviously. Not the irl cunt
>>223378771even for what is your virtue signaling sucks brah
>>223377000they're male gaze coded
>>223378752ofc we'll overlook the "resistance" being led by a girl rightfully usurping a MANLY MAN's masculine role of masculinity
>>223378799you're male gays coded
>>223378780Here I am. Seen it in syndacation though the 80s
>>223377000backlash by women, men loved it and it sold tickers and now hollywood is scared.
>>223378792Rephrase it in english, pelase>>223378799Yes, they are done right. Thanks for noticing
>>223378809>ofc we'll overlook the "resistance" being led by a girl rightfully usurping a MANLY MAN's masculine role of masculinity
>>223378825"Syndication", unc. I had to catch it on a streaming site that no longer exists and I'm convinced that if it were a contemporary release /tv/ types would make a point of whinging about every episode ("typical girlboss shit look at Mike Donovan and Ham Tyler taking orders from Julie and why is there only one black alien? it's because they're trying to demoralise us for being white that's why" etc).
>>223378851>"Jeets in the wifi, router is muttified by corn syrup hands!"/"wtf?"
>>223377000Because the women have to be ugly now. Weinstein is gone, thems the rules
>>223378842>in english, pelase
>>223378853No, you are just stupid and pretend you don't understand what being discussed.If at this point you really still don't understand what normal people complain about in modern shit then you should just kill yourself
>>223378872Yes, esl, It would be appreciated
>>223379001>pretend you don't understand what being discussedYou can't make this shit up.
Because they have to be ugly now
>>223378853Whats your life like? How many vaxxes did they pump into you?
>>223379052I'm fine. Uncle >>223378825's also fine for knowing the original series. You're just a stupid, whiny faggot trawling for virtue (You)s.
>>223379001>you really still don't understand what normal people complain about>normal peopleWHY CAN'T YOU BE NORMAL LIKE US ANON?
>>223377000>>223377257Mary, fuck, kill.>Selene is loyal, loving and devoted.>Alice is a generic hardass.>Movie Lara is an ex-military thot and a thief, I wouldn't trust her.
>>223379147>Mary (sic), fuck, killor you could just rape her on the train Sanjeev
Angie was the only one who survived.
>>223377069>cool heroines>cool>heroines
>>223377000Women, fags, and lunatic oligarchs are in charge now. So women suck in every role and all action or action adjacent movies are inorganic feminized faggotry.
>>223377000woke
>>223379095why are you here?if that's normal here why would you want to come to a place where you're the freak, freak
>>223379502you are stupid, and not in the fun way
>>223378752
>>223379536hopefully woke 2.0 is less gay
>>223379675These are from 22 years ago.
>>223379698yes. we understand how pictures work retard-kun
>>223379411>Women, fags, and lunatic oligarchs are in charge now.Trump is president. Your gas is now 6$
>>223377000Short answer? Because feminism.Longer, more convoluted answer? Because Marxism.
>>223379715why are you pretending then?
>>223377585It was crazy how bad they fucked up with Underworld: Evolution. Ruined the lore, way too much CGI, terrible action scenes, changed the hybrid design and made it look gay, and the whiny, annoying villain who is angry at daddy was a huge downgrade from Bill Nighy.
>>223377000There seems to be this matrix of "who the movie has in it" and "who the movie is for". It was accepted you made movies that appealed to different types of people, sometimes the people in it were the same as the people in it. For example war movies were "men are in it" x "men watch it" and action heroine movies were "woman is in it" x "men watch it". And likewise there were lots of tv series that were "woman are in it" x "women watch it" (Gilmore Girls) but also "men are in it" x "women watch it" (Supernatural)But then that changed. I think 4chan is generally too quick to jump to accusations of misandry, but it does seem that Hollywood decided they just didn't like men watching anything.>>223379675Somebody made this image expecting it to mean something or refer to a reality. Weird.
>Grok zoom in and make them lick a banana
>>223377000woke & cgi outsourcing to india
>>223377000Uff, where to begin? The short answer would be that women feel intimidated and pressured by the trope. The long answer would involve discussing contemporary society favoring instant gratification over long character transformation hero journeys that involve overcoming challenges and trials. Women in particular dislike the hero journey structure and regard it as one of the narrative tools of the patriarchy. I shit you not. Won´t discuss it in detail because nobody would read anyways. Long story short current audiences have no tolerance for building up and want to skip to the payoff. Women in particular feel that they shouldn´t have to earn the power through fire and blood. It´s a right and should belong to them simply because they deserve it and since it´s a sex empowerment thing, individuality has nothing to do with any of it. The character becomes simply a stand in for all women. Because of this mindset the leads end up being nothing more than powerful empty husks. They are unable to be cool characters because writers refuse to write characters at all. No flaws, no struggles, no individuality, no conflict other than tweeter tier social issues.
>>223379887Yeah but it still could have been salvaged. Awakening threw any chance for a future kino it had by revealing the monsters to the general populace. It's funny how Blood Wars just completely ignored that tidbit and went on its day.
>>223379692It will fail too, like anything non based on reality
>>223379675It's so cute to watch leftists try to explain their stances or making a meme only for them to automatically cast a light on the fact that reality don't agree with them