ITT: CGI that has aged like fine milk
>>223381693Still looks better than the glowing nigger face in Thor.
>>223381693I think Nintendo 64 jabba takes the cake
>>223381693
>>223382092what even was the point? they couldn't do an aerial shot with a few extras? don't even need the actors, just doubles
>>223381693unironically i think this looks good tho
>>223381766thisold mediocre CGI is always being compared to new shitty CGI in my mind. jurassic park / lost world look way better than shit like the dog in End of Oak st or that thor thing
should i watch this
>>223382092
>>223381693That's not what it looked like on the drive in or on VHS so the assertion is invalid. EVERYTHING looks bad on high res/blu ray.
>>223381693>>223382059These aren't that bad.>>223382273The scene is dynamic enough that it's unnoticeable unless you freeze frame.>>223382441Soul.
>>223382059the cg is not bad in this scene, it's an example of awful staging and direction
What about CGI that was already aged at time of release?
>>223382505all marvel movies besides the first iron man look as shit as this to me
>>223382488>The scene is dynamic enough that it's unnoticeable unless you freeze frame.copiumhttps://youtu.be/UvLQMMaVmzU?t=153
>>223382092Nothing DLSS 5 can't fix
>>223382579Okay, I might have remembered it more better than it actually is.
Looks much better than the zombies in I Am Legend.
>>223381693ok, you start
>>223382092Amazing that this made it to the final cut.
>>223381693It looks better than all CGI from the past ten years. Texture could use an upgrade and lighting could use an adjustment, but look at the weight of the movement, the realism of it. Jeet render farm slop can't compete.
>>223382579why aren't all the other agents helping smith ever mentioned?
>>223382059asians just don't work in live action.
>>223382059>I totally didn't notice the six dudes arranged in a triangle formation shouting and stomping, and I'm just going to stand there while they levitate a large rock in front of me.
>>223382273This was kino and I'm tired of pretending it wasn't
>>223381693This still looks incredible. The tree falling sells it
>>223382579Did the architect add in the bowling ball sound effect as a subtle nod to Neo?
>>223382692Seriously, why has there never been a dinotopia movie with a big enough budget to do it right?I'll never understand why every studio thinks you can't make a dinosaur movie without calling it Jurassic Park.
>>223382092I thought this was from a Hitman game for a second
Why are people posting still frames? post it moving or don't bother. No one is actually watching a movie and pausing just to see a single bad frame.
>>223382678This
>>223382703RAM got too expensive and controlling so much was causing too much strain. Notice how they all do not say>Inevitableat the same time.
>>223381693first 4 seconds are amazing, after that its just okay
>>223382273they are in a computer tho
>>223383080why are people that dont contribute anything opening their mouths like i give a fuck
>>223383080Yeah, zoomies don't understand cgi or what is bad about it. They think "durrr if I can analyze every frame of a movie under a microscope and detect any pixel that's not indistinguishable from real life, then it's le bad cgi!"
