[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: unnamed.jpg (90 KB, 356x512)
90 KB JPG
To this day I don't understand how the narrative about this movie on both sides landed on "subverting expectations!"
>People were angry because it did things we'd never seen before in Star Wars! It turned Luke into a grumpy hermit who didn't want to help. You know, like Yoda in Empire Strikes Back. But we're going to pretend you only hated it because it was "different."
And it'd be one thing if it was one side saying things like that and the other side going "what the fuck are you talking about" but people accepted the premise and argued based on that narrative.
Just feels like the whole thing was astroturfed because they already had a whole good vs. evil narrative planned out and forced it onto the movie regardless of how little sense it actually made. Which is why it's all the more fucked up that it actually worked. The only solace is it's been almost ten years and I've never seen the same thing happen again.
>>
Nu-wars is shit.
>>
Test
>>
>>223434850
>I pretend not to understand things so I can argue in bad faith
>>
>>223435070
I'd say that's what they did by concocting their narrative, but it doesn't excuse the people who bought into it. Unfortunately you seem to have a vested interest in avoiding that discussion.
Every thread on a 4chan is a race to see which side can spew the usual lines first, and if you beat them to it they just say "p-projecting!" It's funny how predictable it's gotten.
>>
Nobody real liked this movie
>>
I'm just glad nobody in Wake Up Dead Man actually said the words "Wake up, dead man!"
>>
shit flick but star tards are even worse. all this autistic screeching about muh luke was pure retardation
>>
>>223434850
i am coincidentally watching it right now. it's just a series of callbacks to empire that takes place in two rooms but it's the opposite of what you expect, even if the result is fucking stupid
>>
>>223435514
Daisy's ass was the real star of this trilogy. She also looks like an autistic Keira Knightley.
>>
the biggest problem with the movie is it had chances to do interesting things and actually subvert expectations, and it did none of them.
Pretty much everyone agrees Rey should have joined Kylo Ren, and that should have been the cliffhanger for the next movie.

I also don't strongly have a problem with grumpy Luke. I just think it's stupid that he concentrated himself to death.
Luke *not* dying actually would have subverted expectations. It would have been neat to actually see him get his shit together for the third movie.
>>
>>223434850
You mean like when Luke let's the sacred jedi texts burn but no they didn't!?
>>
>>223435476
Luke was the best part of the movie. He was actually fun, and the drama had some engagement factor.
I'm only mad that they killed him, and they killed him stupidly. Which in and of itself was not subverting expectations. What happens to Luke's teachers in the original trilogy? Oh yeah, they both die.

If the third movie was a team up with Luke and I guess Finn and Poe (because Rey would be fucking around with Kylo) wouldn't that have been better? They dragged out Lando to do that exact thing anyway.

Why does Luke need to die? Bilbo Baggins didn't die in Lord of the Rings.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.