>>223446727Yes.
>>223446727Yes?
>>223446727Only if you're a Trekkie already.
>>223446727No, it has nothing to do with Star Trek. It's instead some right-wing revenge fantasy inspired by 9/11 and its aftermath
>>223446727S4, omitting the first and last episodes. The rest is do not touch territory, unless you want to see an example of how bad the GWoT fucked up the TV landscape for a few years, then also s3.
>>223446727Maybe not in order but there are some good individual episodes.
>>223446727I like the season where there's a terrorist attack on Florida and Archer starts torturing people for informationNice to see Trek finally have some balls
>>223446727Yeah, Quantum Leap is a great show, lots of fun to be had.
>>223446727If you want to fall asleep fast, yes.
>>223446727I always get a good nap going when Scott Bakula shows up on tv
>>223447348>right-wing revenge fantasydoesn't archer realize the xindi people aren't responsible for the atrocities their leaders are doing?
>>223447358Carbon Creek is unironically the best trek after VOY
>>223450147yes, it was the duplicitous Joodzira all along
No. The only ep I ever rewatch is the one where they go to the Mirror universe. Show had too much wrong with it>show is a prequel so they can't do certain things, and the crazy shit they do do is met with "wait, how come that was never brought up">Scott Bakula was already on a big scifi show, so every ep looks like an ep of Quantum Leap>they tried to sex up the show too much>take place pre-TOS, but the tech looks better than TNG. I'm not saying go full TOS, but a hybrid design would have looked better>shitty theme song
I like the set designs but the writing sucks.
just watch it
>>223446727Its comfy. Personally recommend firefly and serenity if you haven’t seen them already. But I think enterprise comfortably beside battlestar galactica if you want something less depressing.
>>223446727No
Maybe
Depends on how you feel about the gwot era of media
Huh, the Xindi Arc was because of that 911 thing? It wasn't where they were going with the future war already?
>>223446727Yes, it is good. Only misstep is the intense serialization at times.
>>223452184No it's not "good". It's mediocre at best and only better than the crybaby Disco and SF Academy abortion. In fact, I would place SNW higher than ENT for production value alone. Both have shitty story lines.
>>223446727Mediocre.It has its moments.At least it's still Star Trek, unlike the shit that came out after that, I guess
