[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_7432.jpg (37 KB, 640x480)
37 KB JPG
I want to watch the odissey without nogs
>>
>There is no good and evil...only Balenciaga...and those too weak to seek it
>>
>>223447464
>Some fashions are better than other POwOta!
>>
>>223447464
There's a channel on yt with full length photorealistic AI movies that no one watches because the guy that made them is some blasian mutt creature and most of his movies feature nogs and other assorted 3rd worlders as main characters.
The channel is an ai video pipeline how-to channel that wants people to use its software service, it was featured on cnbc
>>
>>223447565
Share it with us :3
>>
>>223447552
Its already here
see
>>223447565

and the videos look even more real than yours.
>>
>>223447552
>6 million african children died in the making of this video
>>
>>223447577
>>223447579

I haven't watched either of the full length movies, just scrubbed around.
Apparently each one still cost 1 million dollars to make and had a staff of people behind them.
Nog British crime movie. All AI.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=h_qQ0aKyXEA

Mutt guy fantasy film all AI.
This premiered at canned out of competition I think.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=t33k2tn4GpA

Scifi/Fantasy short film all AI, that I did watch, that's ok, but nsfw
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aAg9iDh9_BQ
>>
>>223447464
https://youtu.be/hgt9Q2jQdiU
>>
>>223447600
That sounds high
>>
Evil cannot create OP
>>
>>223447464
It has meme value but not enough to make a whole movie with it
>>
>>223447749
higgsfield more like niggsfield lmao gottem
>>
>>223449365
Tru dat
>>
File: Burns.jpg (177 KB, 1080x808)
177 KB JPG
>>223447464
Kung fury 2 is jailed
>>
>>223447600
If only
>>
>>223448106
back to telegram little goblin
>>
bump
>>
File: 1781438339492.jpg (139 KB, 956x1380)
139 KB JPG
There are plenty of feature length AI animated movies on YouTube. You will probably not be surprised to learn that they are almost all dogshit. Got recommended this AI anime series a couple days ago, some dystopian Cyberpunk thing visually inspired by black American hood culture.

https://youtu.be/omq9HTfxY98

A neat idea, but the execution is dogshit. It uses AI for voice acting, which it sucks at, and I'd guess probably writing, which, at that point, what are you even doing? Plus, still a lot of illegible gibberish writing on background details, I thought AI had that figured out by now.

I'm kinda interested in AI animation in theory, but the people currently working with it neither understand the limitations of the medium, nor have a decent enough grasp on film making as an art form to produce anything impressive. Zack London/Gossip Goblin is probably the best of the bunch on the virtue of using real voice actors and actually writing his own scripts rather than outsourcing even that to AI, he's just not a very good writer.

Probably doesn't help that AI shills have made such an effort to antagonize actual artists and animators who actually know how to produce movies that most are apprehensive to ever working with the technology. Could have said "Hey, here's this interesting new technology you can experiment with, maybe you'll find it interesting" instead of "Hey, here's this magical new device that's gonna replace you, we don't need you gay nerds anymore, better write an application to McDonalds, loser!" Kinda poisoned the well, there.
>>
>>223447464
>he doesn't know
2027 is when the cat comes fully out of the bag
>>
saar give me credit card number now I will email movie
>>
>>223447577
I think he means Higgsfield AI
The video model and pipeline are good

But it just proves how even with all the tools handed to you, panjeets lack the creativity to use it

They don’t understand actual cinematography, writing a script, etc… so their stuff looks good on a glance but is bad entertainment/storytelling
>>
File: 1762100446966516.gif (918 KB, 320x240)
918 KB GIF
remember when Baalenciaga got caught human trafficking so they pushed these clips to distract everyone and it worked
>>
>>223452144
Watching it I realize why it’s shit

>everything is under 10 second scenes and clips
>everyone’s movements are synchronized and looks choreographed like they are backup dancers
>AI prose sounds like poetry and so sounds wierd and not how humans talk
>AI has no world model so sets keep changing from scene to scene

If they knew how to make movies, they’d make a pre-vis first and the finish the rest with the AI by running the pre-vis through it

AI can’t 1 shot everything, humans have to do like 90% of the work and let the AI do the part that would be rewatched expensive like the final CGI rendering after you wrote the storyboard/script/motion capture etc…
>>
>>223447464
Personally I want
>ability to substitute actresses for more attractive women
>ability to watch movies in VR, and jump on the fly from POV to directors camera
>generative AI so I can break the script

Only then will movies be worth paying for.
>>
>>223452423
It's just baffling to me that you'd use AI for writing at all. The actual animation, sure, it's a lot cheaper and easier than live action or traditional 3D or 2D animation. Music and voice acting, I don't think you should use it for that but I get it if you can't afford to hire people for it. But writing? If you finished high school, you can write, and no matter how bad you are at it, it'll be better than AI writing. There's no barrier of entry there.
>>
File: 6456546.gif (885 KB, 420x315)
885 KB GIF
>>223447600
>>
>>223452440
How long must we wait for the streaming site where we can watch all the classics except with enhanced women's bodies and also possible genderswaps (to woman only)?
>>
>>223447464
Watch the italian miniseries from 68 and ulysses from 54
no need to watch nolanshit
>>
>>223452144
This guys stuff is pretty good
https://youtu.be/XV_pnw5_TZM?is=FBIC5edH-RdOWbNJ
>>
This is just red herring from the satan worshipping stuff
>>
>>223453687
That's fair. Voice acting still sounds more monotone that it's supposed to be and I find AI animation imitating 2D animation somehow more awkward than I find it imitating life action, but it's well made, visually.
>>
I watched 2 star wars AI movies recently. Its decent. Not perfect, but decent. Heir to the Empire.
>>
>>223447464
The Vader vs Pinhead fan movie on YouTube is AI kino. There's a few different cut. The 1 hour one is the full thing.
>>
>>223447749
Alex kurtzman should be concerned, these works of art are at least as good as his slop
>>
>>223447464
Balenciaga? After all this time?
>>
>>223453687
He has a very good eye for coloring and lighting, but the editing is off, the lack of facial expressions endemic to all anime is there, but it's undeniable that it LOOKS good. Another year maybe he'll make a full show. Would watch it.
>>
>>223453687
Maybe Katsuhiro Otomo can actually finish that accurate AKIRA adaptation he talked about in 2020.
>>
>>223447749
The problem I'm seeing with ai generation content creation is yeah it can do this but if you don't have a likeable aesthetic or mapped out coherent vision you just end up making uninspired slop no one would want to watch, which is either the same we have right now or worse and, I thought this was going to free us, but now I worry it's going to chain us even more
>>
>>223454032
what's this "us" shit do it yourself m8 the tools are in your hands. and no this isn't me saying
>like you can do any better
i only watch old movies and i don't watch ai. but there are no chains. ai tools are for everyone if you have the money.
>>
>>223454032
That was always naive, man. If they keep getting easier to make, AI animation will be like fanfiction. Where the barrier of entry is so low every bored 14 year old can make one, and almost all of it is disposable trash no one cares about. This was always gonna go from "Hey, this is neat." to "I'm so over this shit" in a matter of years. Which isn't to say you can't make anything good within the medium, but good luck making it stick put amidst all the garbage.

My theory, the first widely acclaimed AI animated movie will either be made by an established film maker, be an adaptation of an established pre-AI property, or both.
>>
>>223452144
I wish I had AI to post furry art when my grandma died.
>>
>>223452403
qrd ?
>>
>>223452653
less than 1% of this board has seen a movie from before 1970
>>
>>223452653
>Watch the italian miniseries from 68
What's the name?
>>
>>223454096
The sad part is once AI trends out of the spotlight (likely for something that is more about living without technology so those in charge can more effectively horde the available tech)

People will genuinely forget AI exists and will essentially just belief whatever they see on a screen. It's already starting to happen now that the quality is starting to improve.
This is why music started to become basic pop with auto tune and Nolan is pushed hard to be the example of "sophistication"
It's all been about training the average person to become stupid.
>>
>>223454196
Odissea
>>
>>223447464
I remember this AI trend, we came a long way compared to now
>>
>>223455389
Tyty
>>
>>223455444
You're welcome
>>
>>223447464
Hollywood is COOKED! By 2025 everyone will be able to make their own full-feature movie with a single prompt.
>>
Had a few remixes I did visuals for which I enjoyed,
https://youtube.com/shorts/csk4ZOYnHak?is=hQS5xqTiOAfxT6oR
This one was based on the most beautiful suicide caught on camera picture of machines of loving grace album cover.

https://youtube.com/shorts/8CvvN37cH_I?is=Vp6q1BdQ_gEsa4kT
This one is my fav, its simple woman gets murdered in forest, but the overall look of this I storyboarded to get each frame how I wanted.

https://youtube.com/shorts/pKqCdpd8Pqc?is=edRGAkPQqQOlt9LE
A woman is in graveyard when she is visited by an angel.

https://youtube.com/shorts/6SEXNcD8t3w?is=sri6MqQQbvLjnouU
https://youtube.com/shorts/wHiSyObv02U?is=c96A_-8op5OHmnsx

These two are follow on couple are skipping time and a timelord comes to collect. Two parter.

I do all the backgrounds and character placements for each frame and then the ai animates it adds the blood etc. Its fun.
>>
>>223447464
As of now, it's really hard to not have A.I. character not make overly exaggerated facial expression when you prompt them to emote if you don't have a video footage of a human actor doing subtle emoting as reference input. Of course, having to hire a real actor and shoot is expensive, and once you have to involve actors, cost savings from A.I. are mostly gone for most types of movies.

I think animu poisoned the dataset. It probably will take a long time to resolve as engineers who make these A.I. video models are all on autism spectrum and can't tell subtle facial expressions apart themselves.
>>
>>223447464
Nice try balenciaga
We still haven't forgotten the baby bondage and sacrifice thing.
>>
>>223455832
It was extremely pathetic how they pushed this meme right after the scandal
>>
>>223447749
Every single shot is center framed lmao
>>
>>223447464
AI can't do video. It will be at least 100 years before AI movies exist.
>>
>>223452403
Based schizo providing no proof.
>>
>>223452403
All big name brands use Asian slave labor sweatshops to produce their tat.
>>
Watch Pomegranate
>>
>>223454172
balenciaga got caught human trafficking then they pushed those clips to distract everyone, it worked
>>
>>223456038
This. Google agrees there was nothing weird going on. End of story.
>>
AI movies are shitty not because theyre AI, theyre shitty because theyre made by "idea guys" , we have seen these guys, they dont even write the scripts, they dont even care about quality and they know nothing of the creative work
>>
>>223447464
I want more blacks and lesbian trannies
>>
>>223456728
To add to what you're saying, these "idea guys" want to just check the all the boxes on current buzz words to sell it to a sucker for big bucks. They don't give a single fuck about the quality of what they're churning out as long as it provides credible enough context on why their startup should be worth X million bucks to a gullible buyer who won't examine too hard before signing the purchase contract.
>>
>>223447464
>the odissey without nogs
I just watched it this weekend. There practically no nogs
>>
>>223452144
>Could have said "Hey, here's this interesting new technology you can experiment with, maybe you'll find it interesting" instead of "Hey, here's this magical new device that's gonna replace you, we don't need you gay nerds anymore, better write an application to McDonalds, loser!" Kinda poisoned the well, there.
"Artists" were the ones that started the fight, not "AI art shills". What happened is that all the LGBTQ+ fetish artists who made their money creating bad fan art felt threatened and so they organized a witch-hunt against AI. Actual artists have never had any reason to give a shit about AI, because AI doesn't work with physical mediums. It was always only internet grifters that felt threatened by AI.
>>
I'm still waiting for the deluge of great films that were just waiting to be made by people who couldn't afford to rent Panaflex cameras and buy filmstock that digital cinematography companies promised. Surely, we should be in a golden age of film by now thanks to all those auteurs being held down by Big Film.
>>
Hell yeah! You guys didnt say they do Sonic the Hedgehog T-Shirts!
>>
>>223447749
>"ai films"
>ugly drama-slop of people constantly talking instead of just stfu and doing something cool
Why is it ALL sooo lame??
>>
>>223458809
Yes, it's quite astounding how many AI animated movies are just people standing in place, talking. Bonus points for vertical aspect ratio.
>>
https://www.youtube.com/@Gossip.Goblin

There is supposed to be two full length ai films by this guy. There are so many shorts which looks cool.
>>
>>223447464
Dragon (2024)

https://watch.plex.tv/movie/dragon-2024
>>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8mNncnEQJk
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BY4A3UzY-7I
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=174AYD1cmdc
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxhWO-nJIKs

Naruto live action
>>
>>223460824
>live action
>>
>>223460871
it says live action on the title, just like the new Lion king was live action.
>>
File: 1760831575202795.png (812 KB, 634x635)
812 KB PNG
>>223456034
>>223455496
It can't even do hands, look at this shit.
>>
>>223460824
That's not what "live action" means.
>>
>>223460759
Unironically this is a slept on gem
Years from now people will be talking about how this was one of the first major AI feature film releases and it slipped through the cracks
>>
the chinese got thousand of chinese soap opera on yt
>>
>>223458078
It’s internet grifters that peddle AI now. I’d ask you to make something for me out of AI for free but I can feel your cortisol spike from my screen
>>
>>223456050
>>223460705
This stuff is showing that AI has potential, but some of the dialog/VA is still a bit stiff, and the stories are a bit stale IMO. The look of it is great however, think of how much time and money it'd take a normal VFX team to create all of that stuff. It does look pretty, even if it's all overly-ornate, and it's only a little ways from there until it's all good enough to replace the sort of stuff that's on daytime TV, or can fill up people's tiktok algorithms. Genuinely pretty impressive looking.
>>
>>223452403
I remember bringing it up back then because it was fucking crazy both happened within weeks of each other
>>
>>223447464
The only passable AI movie out there is Dragon (2024) which is on streaming,

https://fawesome.tv/movies/10649802/dragon

nothing else has been released that is cinematic and commercial
>>
>>223461096
I agree. Dragon seems to be the only AI movie worth a damn right now. I don't know what else feels like a real movie.
>>
>>223458078
did they really "start that fight" or is that the bizarre narrative you crafted in your head? my anecdotal evidence (my anecdotes > your anecdotes) tells me it was faggot journalists and bloggers that once championed AI and rubbed it in the face of blue collar workers, the subject used to be brought up with the 2020 elections. nigs like that andrew yang guy kept making a big stink about it



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.