>frankensteins monster was actually... le good!>the doctor was the bad guy all along!so let me get this straight. the doctor was a bad guy because he didn't want to create the monster a wife, which would have led to the creation of a race of possibly immortal super strong monsters who hate humanity? how was that evil?
>>223453027I don't like saying this unironically, but please have sex.
>>223453111kek and checked
>>223453027the monster wasn't good or bad
>>223453181the real monster was humanity all along
>>223453027I know Frankenstein's Monster lived but does that mean he could maintain a erection or reproduce viable seed? Would Ms. Frankenstein's monster be capable of having viable eggs?If anything Frankenstein should've relaxed and recognized these two were biological dead-ends who would not be able to sire a next generation
>>223453027>frankensteins monster's monster sweaty>frankensteins monster was the doctor
>>223453027no pussy no workno pussy no taxesno pussy no lifesimple as
>>223454621which is why the elites want to create as many feminists and incels as possibleTo destroy society
>>223453027>create a creature >reject it>let it wander into the world>refuse to take responsibility even if it means condemning an innocent woman to deathVictor Frankenstein is basically a woman.
he could have just made her without a uterus, it's not like he didn't know the anatomy
>>223453027He's evil because he encompasses the idea of enlightnment, playing god, defying laws of nature in life and death. Pursuit of progress like a freemason at the expense of the status quo. It's an allegory of Pandoras box. Just because you could does not mean you should.
>>223453181The monster didn't even want to exist, it saw itself as an abomination. Rightfully so, it recognized fundementals of nature real quick that he was not supposed to exist.
>>223453027The monsters weren't going to be able to multiply, I think.
