>>223460097
i bet they use the same or similar score as the movies. if so, they're fucking hacks
may as well use the same actors at that point.
the impact is that it is the best kids novel adaptation ever. better than hungry games, maze runner, twilight etc etc
the new series is gonna be cringe kino
it's gonna feel like watching the original series if they used the wrong/bad takes of scenes.
the delivery is gonna be off. the guy who plays harry is a homo apparently, yikes.
i bet they dont even give voldemort the red snake eyes

>>223460097
Very impactful it's a new classic like Treasure Island or The Hobbit or Lotr

>>223460097
>What is the actual impact of the Harry Potter Series today?
something that a lot of people have a passing awareness of, but don't generally think about outside of a few obsessives. Wo/manchildren on one side, trannies and people like our own pet schizo on the other.
>And how shit is the new HBO series gonna be?
Very. Even taking the casting and OC bullshit they're adding aside, the general aesthetics so far just reek of incompetence.

File: 1788463440471914.jpg (127 KB, 1024x984)

127 KB JPG

>What is the actual impact of the Harry Potter Series today?
it created an entire generation of leftist manchildren that would have made 70s spielberg blush. completely destroyed literature much like jaws destroyed film
>And how shit is the new HBO series gonna be?
Picture very related

>>223460215
>it created an entire generation of leftist manchildren that would have made 70s spielberg blush
If it wasn't Harry Potter, it would have been some other series. Harry Potter was just the most accessible for readers at the time.

Taught me to read.
It's comfy.
I'll watch the new series.

>>223460171
Kind of true but lets be honest, Harry potter is the weakest of the four.