>lolsorandom xD: the movieDid people back in 2005 really find this shit entertaining?
>>223465978YesAnything else?
>>223465978IDK how successful it was but I think a lot of people don't remember it or at least don't remember it fondly, in contrast to the other media bearing the name.
Not really.Co-worker bought me the entire book series for my birthday. Liked it.Kinda excited to see the film when it came out.Complete boring shit.
>>223465978Rewatching I did find it pretty disappointing. Except Bill Nighy’s 3 minute scene elevates the whole thing and makes you forget how bad the other two hours were.
Indeed.It was made by the most daft of life forms. How that council women from that Didney movie didn't "Gas the planet" when she had the chance after this post-Y2K rubbish was released would boggle even the highest of Magratheans..
>>223465978It's based on the first book of a series from the 70s. As with most everything the book is a much better time. I found the movie to be just kinda meh. Little rushed, but it had prime Deschanel in it so I was content just to look at her while she was on screen.
>>223465978It's a bad movie with tragically good casting.>>223466324The BBC miniseries is largely good with some problems like Trillian being a dumb bimbo.
>>223465978>Did people back in 2005 really find this shit entertaining?No, they all threw a shitfit that Ford Prefect was black, just like today.
2005?You know the story was written in 1979 or are you retarded. Rhetorical question.
>>223466842This is /tv/. That's a 2005 movie. Maybe you need to learn to read American before you post.
>>223465978>don't le heccin panickerino
>>223465978no, people like me who had been big fans of the book since the 80s were pretty disappointed in this movie
i liked it but objectively it was alright
