I don't care for this movie. It's too soft and mushy compared to other Pixar movies. Doesn't have any edge
>>223467441Toy Story 1’s subtext about sci-fi replacing westerns is incredibly dated for the 1990s
>>223467441>generic shitty sequel (which was planned to be direct to vhs) to a kids movie gets daily threads here every daydid ishowspeed stream this or something?
Soft and mushy? On what planet?
>>223467561Toy story 2 was the same way>evil stinky pete sees Buzz as the same thread to his future that sci fi shows did to Woody's Roundup
WB won that year. The Iron Giant is better
>>223467615Ironically the themes of 3-5 are all more relevant to when they were made but first 2 are still the best
>Tom Hanks, Tim Allen, Annie Potts, Don Rickles, Jim Varney, Wallace Shawn, John Ratzenberger, Laurie Metcalf, R. Lee Ermey, Penn Jillette>Joan Cusack, Kelsey Grammer, Wayne Knight, Estelle Harris1 has a better cast than 2
>"men" in their 40s are still getting into heated debates over disneyshitgrow the fuck upt. Your (disappointed) father
Yeah, and it took them too long to make a sequel where they properly develop Barbie as a character (if you grew up around girls you would understand), so by the time Toy Story 3 came out I cared fuck all by then..