[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>>
"Can we just talk about the bonus situation?"
>>
>>223564511
There no bonus situation, only a space rabid monke situation
>>
>suddenly moon pirates
Really?
>>
>>223566227
Would you prefer butt pirates?
>>
>>223564476
maybe they should have mitigated it
>>
>>223564476
the worst scifi movie i ever did see
>>
>>223564476
about to marathon the teaser trailer, what am I in for?
>>
>>223564476
Legit 10/10 sci fi kino, interstellar sisters still coping
>>
>>223566641
something that's better than the movie
>>
>>223564476
Pretentious flick with dumb action in regular intervals. Looks nice though
>>
>>223566227
yeah that was weird
also:
>be carefull there are pirates we cant protect you
>suddenly being attacked
>calling for help and out of nowhere thery have air strikes to bomb the pirates
>>
File: slingshot.png (294 KB, 356x512)
294 KB PNG
>>223564476
Now here's a real underrated scifi movie.
>>
>>223564476
the meeting with the dad is a disappointment. if the dad is misanthropic, he shouldn't care about finding aliens. rewrite this shit, and don't make them talk about their family problems, no one cares. also remove the forced good ending
>>
>>223564476
Unexpectedly good, kinda weird it's not talked about more
>>
File: 12 angry men.jpg (180 KB, 1536x1024)
180 KB JPG
>>
>>223566824
Damn right, it's a comfortable slow burn, which is why people hated it - they wanted marvel slop style action 24/7.
>>
>>223566682
>we can't protect you
They meant they're not going to send out the cavalry with them for an intimidating show of force.
>>
>>223566824
I love SF and it filtered me.

What did I miss? Should I give it another go?
>>
After watching that thing, I felt as if my IQ had dropped by 50 points from 140 to 90. Now I work at Walmart, and I’m very happy with my life.
Great movie.
>>
>>223566880
Was it the emotional sentiment of trying to reconnect with his father?
>>
>>223566880
It's an anti-space movie.
>>
>>223568037
kikes need space travel to be verbotten because then actual humans would try to escape this jewish earth
>>
>James Gray Says ‘Ad Astra’ Was ‘Taken Away’ From Him and Made Longer by 20th Century Fox: ‘It Would Have Been a Very Different Movie’
>“I control everything completely on this [‘Paper Tiger’] and, actually, I didn’t on ‘Ad Astra.’ That film was taken away from me. That’s not my cut of the movie,” he said. “You get into discussions and debates, there’s a studio, then the studio [20th Century Fox] got sold to Disney. You get caught in that stuff. The movie was $80 million, ‘Paper Tiger’ was $15 million.”
>When asked his how his version differed to the studio’s edit of “Ad Astra,” he said there were considerable changes.
>“It would have been a very different movie,” he said, adding: “It would be 12 minutes shorter. I’m the only director who makes a shorter director’s cut. I hope someday I’ll do it. I mean, it’s obviously not up to me, but I would love to do it — it would be thrilling for me.”
https://variety.com/2026/film/news/james-gray-ad-astra-taken-away-by-studio-1236758244/
>>
>>223568257
True
>>
>>223564476
awful film.
>>
>>223566227
The concept of parts of the moon being like international waters with pirates is a good one. The problem is the types of vehicles everyone drives there, how they don't seem to care about having extra protection against the vacuum
>>
File: TheLastPush.jpg (91 KB, 556x720)
91 KB JPG
>>223566736
This works, too.
>>
>>223568473
>they don't seem to care about having extra protection against the vacuum
Their portrayal was not incorrect, nor unrealistic. Airplanes fly tens of thousands of feet above the ground at hundreds of miles per hour and yet their protection is so flimsy that if they impact a building or the ground they disintegrate into atoms.
>>
>>223568620
so you're saying everything will be fine as long as nobody... accidentally makes the moon's atmosphere a vacuum? is this what i'm meant to draw from your comparison?
>>
>>223568620
planes are not meant to smash into things. space vehicles KINDA require the ability to protect against the lack of air from what i gather.
>>
>>223568667
Did you gather that from the film? Looks like the space vehicles, moon buggys, worked just fine in the vacuum. They kinda rely on you not having an accident, like your plane analogy.
>>
>>223568620
>>223568774
If you're expecting to be shot at, it would be better to at least be enclosed in the walls and windows of a car than be completely exposed like on those moon rovers.
And if you're a military or company that's high tech enough to have built a moon base, you should easily be able to provide your men with armored vehicles better than regular cars
>>
>>223568774
>Looks like the space vehicles, moon buggys, worked just fine in the vacuum
"looks like westeros has starbucks what's the problem?"
>>
>>223568774
no the film is what was being taken into question. i gathered my knowledge of vacuums and their power from many sources across my lifetime. Why is conversing productively such a struggle for you?
>>
>>223564476
Gave me apocalypse now vibes, I liked it.
>>
>>223568806
>>223568814
Being in a car while being shot at by militaries is a false sense of security. Plenty of YT vids demonstrate this. So no, it's not better to be in a car. High tech and high dollar aren't the same thing. You'd send a tank and APC convoy if you're high-dollar, not necessarily if you're high-tech. Obviously, they cheaped out on this guy. Bureaucracy is a thing, or didn't you notice the DIE hire that was supervising him while on the moon? Seems they had better things to spend their money on than armoured convoys to transport a single pilot.

>>223568814
>westeros
I don't know what that is. Should I have lurked more?

>>223568837
>losing argument = other guy cannot converse productively
Did you also gather from these sources that the moon buggys used in the actual supposed moon landings had zero bulletproof shields on them? They seemed to work just fine for their purpose of ferrying one guy around.
>>
>>223568906
>Obviously, they cheaped out on this guy
Except it goes both ways, both them and the pirates are making the retarded tactical decision to use that combo of armaments and no protection other than their space suits. Why is it such a symmetrical conflict, that way?
>>
>>223568620
Why don't they make airplanes out of Saudi passports?
>>
What a shitty boring movie
>>
>>223569020
That's not explained so I can only surmise that in a future where moon/Mars travel is so commonplace that literal pirates start to appear, they would be not unlike modern pirates such as you'd see in the Somali or Malacca straits. They're not particularly well-equipped, either. They couldn't take on an armoured convoy but they saw a simple, open buggy and thought it would be easy pickings.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.