Predict how fucking horrendous this is gonna be.
They all sound like they’re dying in the recording booth. It’s such a bad idea
>>223590165there's something really off about this picture
>>223590165very very very much so
Really can't imagine anyone desiring to see this.
>>223590211This.As for how bad it will be? It'll rake in the dough because of masses of dopes plus masses of the curious. Chances are, you will see it, but I won't. I won't see it ever unless it becomes free on TV or online and I catch a second or two before it utterly disgusts me and I turn it off repeatedly for the rest of its existence in media.
>>223590253>Chances are, you will see itWell no, those chances are miniscule
>>223590269You found the pic and took the time to make the thread, so out of the two of us, you stand a 100% more of chance of seeing than I.
>>223590165Generic safe uninteresting movie plot that happens to have Simpsons characters in it, just like the first movie was. Just following the template and assuming that brand recognition will bring in money.
Spider pig
>>223590350>Just following the template and assuming that brand recognition will bring in money.Yup. And will be pozzed and hailed as wisdom from God himself. This always happens with tired garbage that won't go away.
>simpsons had been shit for about a decade by the time of the first movie
>>223590414No? That would mean that they were shitty in 1989. OH I see. Da hurr phunney.
This is gonna flop. The core demographic for Simpsons is elder millenials and they've all moved on decades ago.Simpsons isn't even on tv anymore and no one under 30 knows what it is
>>223590474>Simpsons isn't even on tv anymoreThat's just untrue.
I remember when Family Guy and American Dad were widely disrespected as incredibly strained Simpsons knock offs but lately they've gradually but consistently started to replace itI think Simpsons II will desperately try to make up for that and squeeze another 10 years of life out of the show.
>>223590474>and no one under 30 knows what it isAI slop revived it.
>>223590438the movie was in 2007, a decade before that would be 1997.
>>223590211It'll really expose the remaining normie crowd to what the voices are like now, so it might actually lead to the end of the series since reviewers might pick up on how pained Julie Kavner sounds.>>223590517American Dad has been a strangely really good show. It had a rough first season but really pulled it together by season two and has ended up as being consistently pretty good overall. I think it's probably in part thanks to Seth MacFarlane only providing voices and not actually writing it, unlike Family Guy.
>>223590550This. Though the final golden era season is considered to be season 9 and that was in 1998 I think but it was considered still somewhat watchable until season 12.
First movie grossed 183 million domestically
>>223590550Weird Mandela Effect. The movie originally came out in 2000.Don't even try to argue with me.
>>223590688It still had popularity and the wow factor of it being a movie at the time, but that has long since faded in the last 20 years. It was also the time where every show was getting a movie for some reason, even Entourage had a movie.
>>223590165>blood on a Simpsons promo posteram I the only one weirded out by this? nothing new in the show I know but it has specific uses
>>223590726He was beaten to fuck in season two after falling into the gorge, so it's not as bad as it's been.
>>223590767holy fucking shit can you people get any more predictable
>>223590767>>223590923They're doing a meta plot where the enemies are their future selves from a "bad end" timeline. There's probably going to be a specific decision or event which leads to it and the "twist" will be reality collapses if it doesn't happen
>>223590253When was the last time a comedy movie was successful in theaters?
>>223590702i think you just have alzheimer's. better get a check up, friend.
>>223591080Was about the say no idea, but then I remembered that I saw the new MST3K Mike-era revival in theaters last month and it was packed, so I think they made some money.
>>223591097No, I have highly superior autobiographical memory. It is not I who is incorrect, it is CERN.I've proven this by restoring aspects of films that everyone else forgot and or lacks the knowledge to undertake.
>>223591110the lengths people go to just to refuse to admit they remembered something wrong is baffling. it's okay to be wrong sometimes, anon. you don't have to get schizo about it.
>>223590314Why are you randomly assuming some poster is the OP when you weren't even replying to the OP?
I'm an incel with pinworms. The female pinworms make me feel happier since that's technically contact with a girl. Is that wrong?
>>223591134Lick to the center of a Tootsie Pop and you'll find out.>>223591133It doesn't matter, anon. However for me, I think it's mildly entertaining that a movies release date can shift almost ten years and it doesn't affect reality as a whole at all, especially the hardcore fans of The Simpsons like you.Just know that I'm basically a human recording device.
>>223590165Bad enough to be mocked endlessly online. But no matter how bad it is the network suits will never pull the plug on the Simpsons and finally let it die. They're gonna be making new episodes in 2036 using AI voice acting, probably even having the animation and writing done by AI as well but they're still gonna need some brainrot to advertise term life insurance and pharmaceuticals during.
>>223590236It's probably generated by an AI
>>223590165>the boring Family Guy style storytelling of Zombie Simpsons>ugly (and strangely off-model) digital art>desiccated gravely voices of the dead in Dolby Atmos at 120dbI'm sure it'll be great!
>>22359043810 years before the movie would've been like 1996
>>223591175>Just know that I'm basically a human recording device.if you were, you'd know that the simpsons movie came out in 2007. before that, the only other attempt at a simpsons movie was 1992 with the kamp krusty episode. nothing about a simpsons movie was talked about in the late 90s/early 2000s except a rumor of a live action movie that never happened.
>>223591259>He wants to argueSorry, wrong board. It doesn't matter anyways; rarely things revert back like the Jaws line from Roy Scheider did.
>>223591271i'm not arguing, i'm telling you that you are wrong and your memory is not as good as you claim. you can cope with retardo timeline theories all you want, but you are wrong and should accept this.
>>223591293>says he's not arguing >proceeds to argueKinos on people who don't read?
r8 my Margehttps://vocaroo.com/1d85aCjek9eH
>>223591300so not only is your memory shit, your reading comprehension is also shit. good to know.
wonder if theyll show a 10 year olds dick again in this new one.filthy kike nonces
Trump bad within the first 20 minutesScreenshot this
>>223591344"Shitty"\Next time learn grammar instead of aping Australians on a Japanese cooking website if you want to lecture someone.
So which future are they in? Is it one of the ones they've used before, or (more likely) a bland composite of all of them?https://simpsons.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Episodes_set_in_the_futurehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czGhxl2JE3Qhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFYTt9kmAKc
>>223590211>>223590607>implying they won't use the film as the chance to switch the voices over to ai-enhanced and relaunch it for normiesnot saying it will actually rejuvenate the franchise...
Homer is put through a humiliation ritual for 2+ hours
>>223590253>It'll rake in the dough because of masses of dopes plus masses of the curiousWill it? Simpsons was already stretching its relevancy back in 2007 when the first movie came out, so where does that leave it almost 20 years later?
>>223591413They have to top that somehow, you just know it
>>223591668It'll make at least 500 million. I'd be surprised if it doesn't make more like 1.8 billion. There's a ton of stupid fuggers wandering around this fallen nation.
>>223591725The first movie made 500 million. There's no way it makes that now.
>>223591725People are getting dumber and dumber alright but it's a different kind of dumb. crap like the Shitsons are now not even remotely as interesting as crap from recent years/the current yearit will be a massive flop
>>223591748True, it'll make double probably.>>223591805I think you're underestimating how much Mexicans love cartoons. Now, don't get me wrong, I am not attacking Mexicans, but they are propping up NecroSimpsons.
Somehow Russ Cargill returned...
>>223592001Scorpio would make sense.
>For The Itchy & Scratchy Movie shown at the end of the episode, Mike Reiss felt that it should top all other Itchy & Scratchy cartoons in terms of violence, and John Swartzwelder wrote the "most disturbing, horrible sequence", none of which was used in the final cut.wonder if they'll use it this time?
>>223590165it'll be a massive success due to zoomers watching it ironically like they did with that awful minecraft movie last year
My Chinese Bootleg of the 1st movie says it all.
>>223592065In this episode, the phrase "Chief Justice of the Supreme Court" is erroneously used more than once to refer to the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. But in fact, this style is incorrect. The correct style for this individual is "Chief Justice of the United States".
>>223591413It's only fair they show Lisa naked this time.
>>223590165Mid and forgettable. Dying voice actors.Wiill bomb horribly.Officially cancel any plans for a Family Guy movie.
