I don't normally like watching new movies, but this was decent enough.
>>223590179Stay away from the sequel. Mysterious things lose their charm when they receive stupid explainations.
>1997>new
>>223590179watch the sequel immediately because it's called Cube 2: Hypercube
This needs a high budget remake, which is something I never say. The movie has a cool idea but is hampered by the "we can only assemble one room at a time" thing and the acting is fucking terrible, the black dude specifically being the worst and most hammy
>newwhat other new releases have you watched lately anon
>>223590407>>223590480I mean, something for which I haven't seen. I normally just watch the same things over and over again. I fear change.
>>223590453The limitations are exactly what make the movie so good. It feels claustrophobic and isolating and indifferent because it is.You know that if they had an unlimited visual effects budget the movie would end with some vomit-inducing green screen fight where Quentin and Worth are jumping around on the tops of cubes as they fly around
>>223590179I don't understand why people just rewatch movies and shows they've already seen.Looping shit until all the fun is gone is a direct path to depression
>>223590179Joan Leaven is so cute bros
>>223590568nice excuse you came up with, but I know you're a time travellerhere's a tip from the future: the sequel sucks. You may or may not like Cube: Zero, the prequel.
>>223590179It's not new and it's terrible.
>>223590568>I normally just watch the same things over and over again. I fear change.You're just really autistic, Anon, and that's okay. No need for rationalizing
>>223590374I think Cube 2 is a fascinating watch. Yeah it's bad, but I almost appreciate them going all the way on that concept anyway. It's also just generally entertaining, unlike the other other sequel.
>>223591512>>223590374i much prefer cube2 but yeah theyre both pretty terrible
