[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1742755927964817.jpg (160 KB, 960x540)
160 KB JPG
The LOTR trilogy are terribly overrated movies. It is pretty much just a capeshit spectacle. All the movies have awful dialogue and everything is so damn cheesy. I really do not understand how people can stomach this Hollywood trash. The acting is over the top, the CGI hasn't aged well and the tone is very corny. The production values are decent, but that doesn't make a movie good.

These movies are NOT good movies, let alone masterpieces. It is just pure entertainment sloppa for the masses to eat up.
>>
>close up shot on Gandalf as he tearfully emotes in slow motion and the corny music swells to a crescendo
>throw in some gay shit with the prancing hobbits
>have Aragorn catch Gandalf's eyes and return his wistful look
>aaand cut

MASTERPIECE!
>>
Alright well pretty much no one agrees with you.
>>
>>223592645
Yeah because you are all capeshitters
>>
>>223592530
yes, in glad I made you see that it is when I posted for over a year that LOTR is absolute bullshit. Contrived, emotionalism nonsense equivalent to capeshit where you know the ending before you even watch it. Only pretentious retarded faggots think this pretentious trash is actually good
>>
oh look, another "LOTR bad" thread
you're a third worlder
>>
>>223592910
>it's capeshit!
>it's pretentious!

Pick one, faggot.
>>
Go to sleep Christopher.
>>
>>223592530
meanwhile, in reality it is actually the pinnacle of the filmmaking medium
>>
>>223592929
kek
>>
>>223592530
They're fine as sloppy adventure movies sorta but they are objectively terrible lotr adaptations. They're a lot easier to prop up now that Amazon is pumping out garbage that's far worse, but still.
>>
>>223592910
To be fair, it was the first time high fantasy had been done some justice on the big screen. The Battle of Helm's Deep was something we hadn't seen before. It DOES look like capeshit now, because of associations we've built over time, but it was pretty cool when it was new.

The hobbits were always gay, though.
>>
>>223592530
the ppl who say that movies are good and call them "masterpieces" are pretentious morons who think they need to say that because they've been suckered into a feel good emotional frenzy bright on by legal marketing. tldr, they're braindead normies
>>
>>223592930
He was completely right about them and didn't go into enough detail about all the character assassinations
>>
File: jrr.png (882 KB, 1259x832)
882 KB PNG
>>223592961
>Sunset fount them nude, frolicking in the grass
>>
>>223592961
no it isn't. how old are you?
>>
>>223592961
what? speak for yourself pussy ass faggot. I've been saying this since they were released. which was specifically timed after 9/11.
>>
>>223592530
Yeah, kinda.
>>
File: 1670991293280727.jpg (41 KB, 500x500)
41 KB JPG
>>223592530
>>
invasive watching spiderman, Batman or any other superhero flick thinking you're gonna get something other than the the main protagonist and superhero not winning. this is the same with LOTR
>>
>>223592993
Give me one example of a good, big-budget medieval fantasy film before LOTR. Don't say Boorman's Excalibur because that's rooted in national mythology and pseudo-history. There was a time when some believed King Arthur was a real person, but no one ever believed Bilbo Baggins was real, so there's a clear distinction between the genres.
>>
>>223593057
That's not why the flicks are capeshit. They're capeshit because of the quips, some of the action, and the characters which have been twisted and simplified from their book counterparts beyond recognition (Aragorn, Theoden, Gimli and Denethor)
>>
>>223593028
Ah, yes. OP is brown for thinking Hollywoodized adaptations of Tolkien's work helmed by a goreslop VFX spectacle director aren't masterpieces. I too keep disavowing white mediocrity and people like you, the death knell to European heritage, keep calling me brown, trans, and Jewish for it. You could die tomorrow, anon, and the white race wouldn't be poorer for it.
>>
>>223593028
Liking the hackson trilogy is brown.
>>
>>223593072
>LOTR
>medieval fantasy film
>>
>>223593127
browns didnt even have a chance to see them in theaters so i dont think so
>>
>>223592530
2/10 ragebait
>>
>>223593072
>moved the goal post from "high fantasy" to "big budget"
kys you blithering fucking moron.
>>
>>223593057
imagine*
>>
>>223593137
Then what is it, Mongo, a futuristic fantasy film?
>>
>>223592530
True, I couldn't believe how bad that movie with the ghost army and the mouth of Sauron was (The Two Tower I guess?), yet the reviews were glowing lol, it was absolute ridiculous trash
>>
>>223592530
>>223592910
>>223592976
>>223593111
>>223593127
What an absolute shitshow of a thread lmao, i bet OP is a seething Marvel tranny angry that his slop movies will never be recognized as high art.
>>
>>223594676
>no argument
Concession accepted. Nobody calling the lotr flicks capeshit likes marvel you retard.
>>
>>223592530
We get it, you're brown. Don't you have a street to go shit in somewhere?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.